Assignment week 12
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of the Cumberlands *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
734
Subject
Finance
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
9
Uploaded by PrivateMask15464
Assignment 12
Ahmed Abdelhamed University of the Cumberlands
Corp Fin: Fiscal Mngmnt GloCul (BADM-734-M40) - Full Term
Dr. Adu Bonna
November 14
th
, 2023
Does Capital Structure Impact Firm Performance: An Empirical
Study of Three U.S. Sectors
Abstract
This research study investigates the relationship between capital structure and firm performance in three sectors in the United States: Industrial, Healthcare, and Energy. The study aims to determine whether capital structure negatively or positively impacts firm performance and to what extent. The research question being examined is whether there is a significant relationship between capital structure and firm performance.
The study utilizes a quantitative research method, collecting data from secondary sources such as annual reports and Yahoo Finance over a ten-year period (2004-2013). The sample consists of 30 randomly selected firms from each sector, resulting in a total of 300 observations per sector. Four dependent variables (market value per share, return on assets, operating return, and profit margin) and one independent variable (long-term liabilities to total assets ratio) are used to measure firm performance and capital structure, respectively.
The findings of the study reveal that the relationship between capital structure and firm performance varies depending on the sector and the specific performance measure used. In the Industrial Sector, capital structure has a negative relationship with return on assets and operating return, but a positive relationship with profit margin. In the Healthcare Sector, capital structure has a negative relationship with return on assets and operating return, but no relationship with profit margin or stock price. In the Energy Sector, capital structure has a negative relationship with return on assets, operating return, and profit margin. There is no relationship between capital structure and stock price in any sector.(Cole et al., n.d.)
The study supports Modigliani and Miller's theory that capital structure and stock price are independent of each other. The results suggest that firms in the Industrial and Healthcare Sectors should consider alternative financing options if they do not want to reduce their performance ratios, while firms in the Energy Sector should seek alternative financing to avoid negative impacts on performance. The study contributes to the limited research on the relationship between capital structure and firm performance in U.S. companies within specific sectors.
Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the relationship between capital structure and firm performance in different sectors, highlighting the importance of considering sector-specific factors and performance measures when analyzing this relationship.
Problem Statement
The problem statement of this article is to determine the relationship between capital structure and firm performance in the Industrial, Healthcare, and Energy sectors of U.S. firms. The study aims to investigate whether capital structure negatively or positively impacts firm performance and to what extent. The research question being examined is whether there is a significant relationship between capital structure and firm performance. The study seeks to provide insights for firms in these sectors on how to select financing options that will maximize performance and minimize risk.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Significance & Purpose of the study
The significance of the study is to determine the relationship between capital structure and firm performance in the Industrial, Healthcare, and Energy sectors of U.S. firms. The study aims to provide insights for firms in these sectors on how to select the financing options that will maximize performance and minimize risk. By analyzing the relationship between capital structure and firm performance, the study contributes to the existing literature in corporate finance and fills the gap in research on U.S. companies within specific sectors.
The study examines the relationship between capital structure and firm performance in the Industrial, Healthcare, and Energy sectors in the United States. The study finds that the relationship between capital structure and firm performance varies depending on the sector and the variable used to measure firm performance. In the Industrial Sector, capital structure has a negative relationship with return on assets and operating return, but a positive relationship with profit margin. There is no relationship between capital structure and stock price. In the Healthcare Sector, capital structure has a negative relationship with return on assets and operating return, but no relationship with profit margin or stock price. In the Energy Sector, capital structure has a negative relationship with return on assets, operating return, and profit margin. There is no relationship between capital structure and stock price. The study supports Modigliani and Miller's theory that capital structure and stock price are independent of each other. The findings suggest that firms in the Industrial and Healthcare Sectors should consider alternative financing options if they do not want to reduce their performance ratios, while firms in the Energy Sector should seek alternative financing to avoid negative impacts on performance.
The study highlights the importance of considering different measures of firm performance and
capital structure when analyzing their relationship. The study contributes to the limited research on the relationship between capital structure and firm performance in U.S. companies within specific sectors.
The purpose of the study is to investigate whether capital structure negatively or positively impacts firm performance and to what extent. The research question being examined is
whether there is a significant relationship between capital structure and firm performance. By utilizing quantitative methods and analyzing data from annual reports and secondary sources, the
study aims to provide empirical evidence on the relationship between capital structure and firm performance. The findings of the study can help firms make informed decisions regarding their financing choices and optimize their performance ratios.
Research Method
The authors use a quantitative study method to address the problem. They collect data from secondary sources, such as annual reports and Yahoo Finance, and analyze the relationship between capital structure and firm performance using regression analysis. They treat the performance variables as dependent variables and the capital structure variable as an independent
variable. The study aims to determine the extent of the relationships between capital structure and firm performance and whether these relationships are statistically significant.
Critical analysis
Strengths of the study are as follows, The study focuses on U.S. companies within the Industrial, Healthcare, and Energy sectors, providing sector-specific insights into the relationship
between capital structure and firm performance. The study utilizes a quantitative research method, collecting data from secondary sources over a ten-year period, which enhances the reliability and validity of the findings. The study considers multiple measures of firm performance, including market value per share, return on assets, operating return, and profit margin, providing a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between capital structure and different performance indicators. The study contributes to the existing literature by examining the relationship between capital structure and firm performance in U.S. companies, which has been relatively understudied in this specific area of corporate finance.
On the other hand, the Limitations of the study are The study relies on secondary data sources, such as annual reports and Yahoo Finance, which may have limitations in terms of accuracy and completeness. The study only considers a sample of 30 firms in each sector, which may not fully represent the entire population of firms in those sectors. The findings may not be generalizable to
all firms in the Industrial, Healthcare, and Energy sectors. The study focuses on a specific time (2004-2013), and the findings may not be applicable to different time periods or economic conditions. The study does not consider other factors that may influence firm performance, such as industry-specific factors, management quality, or macroeconomic conditions. These factors could potentially confound the relationship between capital structure and firm performance. The study does not explore the causality between capital structure and firm performance, as it only
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
examines the relationship between the two variables. Further research is needed to establish causality and understand the mechanisms through which capital structure affects firm performance.
Conclusion
The conclusion of the study is that the relationship between capital structure and firm performance varies depending on the sector and the variable used to measure firm performance. In the Industrial Sector, capital structure has a negative relationship with return on assets and operating return, but a positive relationship with profit margin. In the Healthcare Sector, capital structure has a negative relationship with return on assets and operating return, but no relationship with profit margin or stock price. In the Energy Sector, capital structure has a negative relationship with return on assets, operating return, and profit margin. There is no relationship between capital structure and stock price in any sector.
The findings of the study generally support the conclusion. The results show that capital structure has a significant impact on certain performance measures in each sector. However, it is important to note that the relationship between capital structure and firm performance can vary depending on the specific variable used to measure performance. Therefore, the conclusion suggests that firms in different sectors should consider alternative financing options based on the specific performance ratios they want to optimize. The study also supports Modigliani and Miller's theory that capital structure and stock price are independent of each other.
Future work A potential proposal for future research on the topic could be to investigate the impact of capital structure on firm performance in different countries or regions. The existing literature primarily focuses on U.S. firms or specific countries, such as Pakistan or Nigeria. Conducting a comparative analysis across different countries or regions would provide valuable insights into how cultural, legal, and economic factors influence the relationship between capital structure and
firm performance.
The research could involve selecting a sample of firms from various countries or regions and analyzing their capital structure and performance using similar variables and methodologies. By comparing the results across different countries or regions, researchers can identify any variations in the relationship between capital structure and firm performance. This would help in understanding the role of country-specific factors, such as financial regulations, tax systems, and market conditions, in shaping the relationship.
Additionally, future research could explore the impact of different industry characteristics
on the relationship between capital structure and firm performance. The current study focuses on the Industrial, Healthcare, and Energy sectors in the United States. However, other sectors, such as technology, consumer goods, or financial services, may have unique dynamics that influence the relationship between capital structure and firm performance. Investigating these industry-
specific factors would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.
Furthermore, it would be beneficial to examine the long-term effects of capital structure decisions on firm performance. The current study analyzes the relationship between capital
structure and firm performance over a ten-year period. However, understanding how capital structure decisions impact firm performance in the long run, beyond the scope of the study period, would provide valuable insights for firms and policymakers.
Overall, future research should aim to expand the geographical scope, consider industry-
specific factors, and investigate the long-term effects of capital structure on firm performance to further enhance our understanding of this important corporate finance topic.
References
Cole, C., Yan, Y., & Hemley, D. (n.d.). Does Capital Structure Impact Firm Performance: An Empirical Study of Three U.S. Sectors
.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Questions
Question 1
SUPERIOR Company Limited is a large conglomerate company in United Kingdom
and is considering the following projects for inclusion in its capital budget for year
2021. The projects have equal risks and the capital outlay required is as follows:
Project
Investment required
1
2
3
4
5
£'000
24,000
9,600
7.000
4,800
3,200
1,400
Return
£'000
5,520
3,072
980
864
640
392
As the Divisional Manager, you are to decide which of the projects to accept. The
company has a cost of capital of 15% with £60million available to the division for
investment purposes.
Required:
Compute the total investment, total return on capital invested and residual income on
each of the following assumptions, indicating the preferred project:
a. The Company has a rule that all projects promising at least 20% or more should
be accepted.
b. The divisional manager is evaluated on his ability to maximise his return on
capital investment.
c. The divisional manager is expected to maximise residual income as…
arrow_forward
Question 1
SUPERIOR Company Limited is a large conglomerate company in United Kingdom
and is considering the following projects for inclusion in its capital budget for year
2021. The projects have equal risks and the capital outlay required is as follows:
Investment required
Project
Return
£'000
5,520
3,072
980
864
640
392
1
2
3
4
5
6
£'000
24,000
9,600
7.000
4,800
3,200
1,400
As the Divisional Manager, you are to decide which of the projects to accept. The
company has a cost of capital of 15% with £60million available to the division for
investment purposes.
Required:
Compute the total investment, total return on capital invested and residual income on
each of the following assumptions, indicating the preferred project:
a. The Company has a rule that all projects promising at least 20% or more should
be accepted.
b. The divisional manager is evaluated on his ability to maximise his return on
capital investment.
c. The divisional manager is expected to maximise residual income as…
arrow_forward
Problem 23-1
An institutional investor is comparing management fees for two competing real estate investment funds. Both funds expect to begin
operations and are accepting capital commitments. When the funds begin acquiring properties, capital calls will be made for capital
contributions during the investment period. Fund A will charge a fee of 45 BP on capital committed and 60 BP on capital invested after
the investment period ends. Fund B will charge a fee of 50 BP on capital committed and 55 BP on capital invested after the investment
period ends. Both funds expect to have $500,000,000 in capital commitments when the fund commences operations and both project
a five-year cycle for startup and acquisitions. Capital flows are expected as follows:
Fund A
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Fund B
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Contributed
Capital
$ 200,000,000
300,000,000
Contributed
Capital
$ 300,000,000
200,000,000
Capital
Returned
$0
0
0
100,000,000
50,000,000
Capital
Returned
$0…
arrow_forward
Question Two
a) A company has $10 million available for investment. It is considering investing in three
individual investment projects.
Project One
Project Two
Project Three
Initial Investment
$4 million
$2 million
$7 million
Net present value
$9 million
$3 million
$11 million
What would be the opportunity cost of investing in Project One?
b) What is the strongest argument in favor of setting a common hurdle rate across a company
for all projects?
c) You have been asked to determine the internal rate of return (IRR) of a project that has an
initial cash outflow, followed by seven years of net cashflows. The project's net present
value was +$500,000 when determined at 11% and -$500,00 when determined at 16%.
arrow_forward
Question 16 of 30
View Policies
Current Attempt in Progress
-/0.35 ⠀
Crane Crafts Corp. management is evaluating two independent capital projects that will each cost the company $200,000. The two
projects will provide the following cash flows:
Year
Project A
Project B
1
$66,750
$26,450
2
93,450
66,125
3
34,235 143,250
4
151,655
98,110
(a1)
What is the payback period of both projects? (Round answers to 2 decimal places, e.g. 15.25.)
The Payback of Project A is
years and Project B is
eTextbook and Media
Save for Later
Using multiple attempts will impact your score.
20% score reduction after attempt 2
years.
Attempts: 0 of 3 used Submit Answer
(a2)
The parts of this question must be completed in order. This part will be available when you complete the part above.
Search
♡
arrow_forward
financial management ch 11 quiz
please show work, thank you.
arrow_forward
Part D: Investment Decisions
Now consider that Luxio has identified the following two mutually exclusive projects:
Year
0
1
2
3
4
Cash Flow (A)
-$34,000
$16,500
$14,000
$10,000
$6,000
Cash Flow (B)
-$34,000
$5,000
$10,000
$18,000
$19,000.
1. What is the IRR for each of these projects? Based on IRR decision rule, which
project should the company accept?
2. If the required return is 11%, what is the NPV for each of these projects?
Based on the NPV decision rule, which project should the company accept?
3. Over what range of discount rates would the company choose project A? At
what discount rate would the company be indifferent between these two
projects? Explain.
arrow_forward
Abhaliya
arrow_forward
kar
arrow_forward
Problem 4–1The Riverside Company is evaluating two mutually exclusive assets: Black and White, at the end of 2020. The firm’s weighted average cost of capital is 8%. Data for each project are as follows:
Data is enclosed in the picture.
Requirements:
Compute the net present value for each asset using Excel's NPV function.Determine which project the Riverside Company should invest in based on NPV.Compute the profitability index for each project.Determine which project the Riverside Company should invest in based on the profitability index.Should the firm invest in the Black or White project? What is the basis for your choice?
arrow_forward
Question 3
You are the treasurer of a mid-cap company and you are analyzing two equity
opportunities as potential investments for your working capital of US$100 million. You
are given the following information and can only choose one investment.
Investment A (cash flows in US$millions)
Year
Cashflow
Year
Cashflow
0
Investment B (cash flows in US$millions)
Market Return
-100
Market Variance
0
1
-100
54
1
67
11%
24%
2
28
76
31
2
89
3
98
3
You are also given the following information to aid with your investment decision:
Risk Free Rate
3.50%
98
Investment A (COV/Market)
Investment B (COV/Market)
Discuss and evaluate whether to pick Investment A or Investment B.
4
121
4
176
arrow_forward
arning X
+
tps://ng.cengage.com/static/nb/ui/evo/index.html?deploymentid=5933142288413647560152243&eISBN=97813379
CENGAGE | MINDTAP
11: Assignment - The Basics of Capital Budgeting
Blue Llama Mining Company is evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project (project Sigma) that will require an initial investment of
$800,000.
Blue Llama Mining Company has been basing capital budgeting decisions on a project's NPV; however, its new CFO wants to start using
the IRR method for capital budgeting decisions. The CFO says that the IRR is a better method because returns in percentage form are
easier to understand and compare to required returns. Blue Llama Mining Company's WACC is 8%, and project Sigma has the same risk
as the firm's average project.
The project is expected to generate the following net cash flows:
Year
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Cash Flow
$350,000
$475,000
$425,000
$500,000
Which of the following is the correct calculation of project Sigma's IRR?
34.38%
38.20%
42.02%
O 36.29%
arrow_forward
4-
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you

Accounting (Text Only)
Accounting
ISBN:9781285743615
Author:Carl Warren, James M. Reeve, Jonathan Duchac
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou...
Finance
ISBN:9781337395250
Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Related Questions
- Question 1 SUPERIOR Company Limited is a large conglomerate company in United Kingdom and is considering the following projects for inclusion in its capital budget for year 2021. The projects have equal risks and the capital outlay required is as follows: Project Investment required 1 2 3 4 5 £'000 24,000 9,600 7.000 4,800 3,200 1,400 Return £'000 5,520 3,072 980 864 640 392 As the Divisional Manager, you are to decide which of the projects to accept. The company has a cost of capital of 15% with £60million available to the division for investment purposes. Required: Compute the total investment, total return on capital invested and residual income on each of the following assumptions, indicating the preferred project: a. The Company has a rule that all projects promising at least 20% or more should be accepted. b. The divisional manager is evaluated on his ability to maximise his return on capital investment. c. The divisional manager is expected to maximise residual income as…arrow_forwardQuestion 1 SUPERIOR Company Limited is a large conglomerate company in United Kingdom and is considering the following projects for inclusion in its capital budget for year 2021. The projects have equal risks and the capital outlay required is as follows: Investment required Project Return £'000 5,520 3,072 980 864 640 392 1 2 3 4 5 6 £'000 24,000 9,600 7.000 4,800 3,200 1,400 As the Divisional Manager, you are to decide which of the projects to accept. The company has a cost of capital of 15% with £60million available to the division for investment purposes. Required: Compute the total investment, total return on capital invested and residual income on each of the following assumptions, indicating the preferred project: a. The Company has a rule that all projects promising at least 20% or more should be accepted. b. The divisional manager is evaluated on his ability to maximise his return on capital investment. c. The divisional manager is expected to maximise residual income as…arrow_forwardProblem 23-1 An institutional investor is comparing management fees for two competing real estate investment funds. Both funds expect to begin operations and are accepting capital commitments. When the funds begin acquiring properties, capital calls will be made for capital contributions during the investment period. Fund A will charge a fee of 45 BP on capital committed and 60 BP on capital invested after the investment period ends. Fund B will charge a fee of 50 BP on capital committed and 55 BP on capital invested after the investment period ends. Both funds expect to have $500,000,000 in capital commitments when the fund commences operations and both project a five-year cycle for startup and acquisitions. Capital flows are expected as follows: Fund A Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Fund B Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Contributed Capital $ 200,000,000 300,000,000 Contributed Capital $ 300,000,000 200,000,000 Capital Returned $0 0 0 100,000,000 50,000,000 Capital Returned $0…arrow_forward
- Question Two a) A company has $10 million available for investment. It is considering investing in three individual investment projects. Project One Project Two Project Three Initial Investment $4 million $2 million $7 million Net present value $9 million $3 million $11 million What would be the opportunity cost of investing in Project One? b) What is the strongest argument in favor of setting a common hurdle rate across a company for all projects? c) You have been asked to determine the internal rate of return (IRR) of a project that has an initial cash outflow, followed by seven years of net cashflows. The project's net present value was +$500,000 when determined at 11% and -$500,00 when determined at 16%.arrow_forwardQuestion 16 of 30 View Policies Current Attempt in Progress -/0.35 ⠀ Crane Crafts Corp. management is evaluating two independent capital projects that will each cost the company $200,000. The two projects will provide the following cash flows: Year Project A Project B 1 $66,750 $26,450 2 93,450 66,125 3 34,235 143,250 4 151,655 98,110 (a1) What is the payback period of both projects? (Round answers to 2 decimal places, e.g. 15.25.) The Payback of Project A is years and Project B is eTextbook and Media Save for Later Using multiple attempts will impact your score. 20% score reduction after attempt 2 years. Attempts: 0 of 3 used Submit Answer (a2) The parts of this question must be completed in order. This part will be available when you complete the part above. Search ♡arrow_forwardfinancial management ch 11 quiz please show work, thank you.arrow_forward
- Part D: Investment Decisions Now consider that Luxio has identified the following two mutually exclusive projects: Year 0 1 2 3 4 Cash Flow (A) -$34,000 $16,500 $14,000 $10,000 $6,000 Cash Flow (B) -$34,000 $5,000 $10,000 $18,000 $19,000. 1. What is the IRR for each of these projects? Based on IRR decision rule, which project should the company accept? 2. If the required return is 11%, what is the NPV for each of these projects? Based on the NPV decision rule, which project should the company accept? 3. Over what range of discount rates would the company choose project A? At what discount rate would the company be indifferent between these two projects? Explain.arrow_forwardAbhaliyaarrow_forwardkararrow_forward
- Problem 4–1The Riverside Company is evaluating two mutually exclusive assets: Black and White, at the end of 2020. The firm’s weighted average cost of capital is 8%. Data for each project are as follows: Data is enclosed in the picture. Requirements: Compute the net present value for each asset using Excel's NPV function.Determine which project the Riverside Company should invest in based on NPV.Compute the profitability index for each project.Determine which project the Riverside Company should invest in based on the profitability index.Should the firm invest in the Black or White project? What is the basis for your choice?arrow_forwardQuestion 3 You are the treasurer of a mid-cap company and you are analyzing two equity opportunities as potential investments for your working capital of US$100 million. You are given the following information and can only choose one investment. Investment A (cash flows in US$millions) Year Cashflow Year Cashflow 0 Investment B (cash flows in US$millions) Market Return -100 Market Variance 0 1 -100 54 1 67 11% 24% 2 28 76 31 2 89 3 98 3 You are also given the following information to aid with your investment decision: Risk Free Rate 3.50% 98 Investment A (COV/Market) Investment B (COV/Market) Discuss and evaluate whether to pick Investment A or Investment B. 4 121 4 176arrow_forwardarning X + tps://ng.cengage.com/static/nb/ui/evo/index.html?deploymentid=5933142288413647560152243&eISBN=97813379 CENGAGE | MINDTAP 11: Assignment - The Basics of Capital Budgeting Blue Llama Mining Company is evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project (project Sigma) that will require an initial investment of $800,000. Blue Llama Mining Company has been basing capital budgeting decisions on a project's NPV; however, its new CFO wants to start using the IRR method for capital budgeting decisions. The CFO says that the IRR is a better method because returns in percentage form are easier to understand and compare to required returns. Blue Llama Mining Company's WACC is 8%, and project Sigma has the same risk as the firm's average project. The project is expected to generate the following net cash flows: Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Cash Flow $350,000 $475,000 $425,000 $500,000 Which of the following is the correct calculation of project Sigma's IRR? 34.38% 38.20% 42.02% O 36.29%arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Accounting (Text Only)AccountingISBN:9781285743615Author:Carl Warren, James M. Reeve, Jonathan DuchacPublisher:Cengage LearningFundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou...FinanceISBN:9781337395250Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. HoustonPublisher:Cengage Learning

Accounting (Text Only)
Accounting
ISBN:9781285743615
Author:Carl Warren, James M. Reeve, Jonathan Duchac
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou...
Finance
ISBN:9781337395250
Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher:Cengage Learning