Good Vs Evil Essays

pdf

School

Hudson County Community College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

HESI

Subject

English

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

39

Uploaded by DeaconSalmonMaster921

Report
Good Vs. Evil, By Flannery O ' Connor In the short story "A good Man is Hard to Find" written by Flannery O'Connor in 1953 and set in the rural southern United States, there are many themes, such as the importance of family, good versus evil, and Christian theology. The theme of good versus evil is more prominent throughout the story. This analysis will attempt to prove the theme of good versus evil that is present throughout all aspects, as seen in its characters, motifs, and symbolism, of thus producing a compelling and adventurous piece of literature. In this tale a family takes a vacation to Florida where a murderer who calls himself the Misfit, who was well designed by O'Connor to represent the grotesque qualities of humanity, has just escaped from prison. During a brief lunch break in which the grandmother and store owner, Red Sammy, lament the ills of society and reminisce about how much better life used to be and how no one is good anymore; while ironically, they themselves are not the best people. Later, after a misinformed wrong turn, the grandmother's smuggled cat gets loose and causes a damaging wreck, this angers her son Bailey but he doesn't confront her immediately, he needs to attend to his wife who has suffered a broken shoulder. After a few minutes the Misfit and his henchmen find them and get out of their vehicle, they look like they might be about to offer help but the grandmother recognizes the Misfit and makes it obvious. Now that the stage and plot have been set for "A Good Man is hard to Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Good Vs. Evil In conclusion, humans are capable of both good and evil. Both of the novels show the protagonist caring about other people over themselves. Also,they are both hoping for the world to be a better place.Moretheless, evil is always found all around us, even when we do not know, which also result in goodness being around us, it is just that we would have to look harder for it.All of this comes down to it evil is much easier to find than goodness. Both of the authors gave us an idea of how evil can take control of your life and even take the things you love the most away. The authors also focus about how good can come at anytime in your life. Also, they focus on the evil of human nature which teaches us that even the people around us have evil Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Good vs. Evil Good Vs. Evil In Beowulf, the conflict between good and evil is the poem 's main and most important aspect. The poet makes it clear that good and evil doesn't exist as only opposites, but that both qualities are present in everyone. Beowulf represents the ability to do good or to perform acts selflessly and in help of others. Goodness is also showed throughout this epic as having the ability to cleanse evil. Even though evil is presented by Grendel , Grendel 's mother, and the dragon, who are filled with a desire to act against people and ultimately destroy them, even pride, a human quality, is presented in Beowulf as a sign that evil exists. This story might even be considered a classic because it mainly talks about the old fashion ...show more content... He often talked about his accomplishments saying, "They had seen me bolstered in the blood of enemies when I battled and bound five beasts, raided a troll–nest and in the night– sea slaughtered sea–brutes." (Beowulf 419–422), which shows how good can also be a bit proud. In the end, though, most of the time good will always defeat evil but good won't always stay alive. For example, in the end of Beowulf, although Grendel was killed by Beowulf as well as his mother, Beowulf still dies. In other words, just because evil is defeated doesn't mean good will always live. On a different but similar note, is Grendel 's mother, who is seen as vengeful. Different, because she isn 't the same type of evil that Grendel is, but similar because she is still an opponent to both men and the society of man at the time that Beowulf was written, or rather, spoken. Also, Grendel 's mother is tainted in the opposite way that Grendel is; while Grendel is given a humanistic point of view, people try to dehumanize Grendel 's mother. While she is indeed just as evil as Grendel was, she does not represent the utter evil that man must fight to achieve immortality. She is a symbol of defiance of man, but she can be seen as more of a neutral symbol. Grendel 's mother doesn 't attack Heorot because she doesn 't like it. She attacks it because Beowulf killed her only son, "But now his mother had sallied forth on a savage journey, grief–racked and Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Good Vs Evil In Beowulf Essay The battle between good and evil and the inevitable victory of the good is very evident in Beowulf. There is a power struggle between the divine and the sinister throughout the novel, and the divine come out on top, every time. No matter who Beowulf decides to fight, he always leaves victorious. It also shows how disgusting, cruel, and dehumanized all of his opponents are. This all ties together to show us this idea of a struggle between the good and the evil in Beowulf . The first beast that Beowulf battles is a hideous, demonic, blood–thirsty creature named Grendel. Grendel continuously attacks and eats humans for food, and to a degree for joy. In line 285 the epic says, "Out from the marsh, from the foot of misty hills and bogs, bearing God 's hatred, Grendel came.". The epic here is telling us how evil Grendel is, how he came from a filthy marsh, and how he is filled with hatred. This highlights the pure evil that Beowulf is battling. In line 366 it says, "That mighty protector of men meant to hold the monster till its life leaped out.". Here the epic is calling Beowulf the mighty protector, which is emphasizing his larger–than–life qualities and his kindness. It shows us how fearless, courageous, and kind Beowulf is to protect the Danes from such a terrifying monster. In line 359 it says, "Screams of the Almighty's enemy sang in the darkness.". Here the epic is describing Grendel's pathetic screams in his defeat, and calling Beowulf the, "Almighty". It portrays the idea Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Hamlet Good vs Evil Essay "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark" –William Shakespeare Good VS. Evil Why Does Hamlet delay so long in achieving his revenge– what is really stopping him? There is an inner battle inside Hamlet that no one knows about, good versus evil, stuck between both worlds. Hamlet is the only one who can decided which world to want to be apart of. Hamlet , the story, reveals that the individual can only find meaning by looking inward and living according to his or her own beliefs and including values. Being and thinking independently is the key to purpose and inner peace. Unfortunately most human beings fail to find this inner peace because of the need conform to the group and act according to the desire of others. Why does is ...show more content... So Hamlet had plenty of reason to murder Claudius but what took him so long? He had the inner battle of good vs. evil. Hamlet's 'good side' was telling him that no good would come of this. Hamlet believes that things should be naturally good, and that people's motives should be fair. Therefore, he has an immense deal of difficulty in coming to terms with all of the evil that is around him in a damage world. As Hamlet said himself, "'Tis an unweeded garden that grows to seed; Things rank and gross in nature possess it merely" (I, ii, 139–141). He was infuriated with the fact that his mother didn't wait a month to marry his Uncle. So he has every reason to do it. But still no action has taken place. Another thought that may have caused Hamlets delay it the idea that he isn't sure of weather or not the ghost he has been seeing is a devil or not. So he doesn't want to commit a murder for no reason, maybe what the ghost is telling him could be coming from the devil and he wouldn't want to commit a crime of such. "The spirit that I have seen may be a devil, and the devil hath power t' assume a pleasing shape; yea, and perhaps, out of my weakness and my melancholy, as he is very potent with such sprits, abuses me to damn me. I'll have grounds more relative then this." (2,2,627–633) For Hamlet to continue to go thru with the murder he comes up with another way to find out. He wrote the play replicating Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Othello Good Vs Evil Essay The Root of Evil The conflict of good versus evil, in religion, a social atmosphere, or for entertainment purposes, plays a role in all societies from the first civilizations to modern day. The nature of right and wrong often exists in literature in order to show that good always defeats evil. However, in William Shakespeare 's Othello, the Moor of Venice, malevolence subdues the good in the play. The play focuses on the marriage of Othello, a North African, and his wife Desdemona, a beautiful Venetian daughter of a prominent senator. Iago, Othello's ensign, successfully manipulates multiple unknowing characters in order to achieve the result of his plan; end the marriage of Othello and Desdemona. As the play goes on, Iago's plans fall into place, ultimately resulting in the death of most of the plays main characters. The morality of Iago is often a topic of debate; can Iago truly be described as evil ? According to Simon Baron–Cohen, a professor of psychopathology at ...show more content... He successfully manipulates Roderigo, Cassio, Desdemona, and Othello into doing what he wants and he never once is a suspect due to his great façade of friendliness. Iago exploits certain personality traits of each character in order to achieve his master plan. For example, Iago uses Desdemona's kind heart against her by making Othello believe that her consistent vouching for Cassio to earn his rank back is due to her alleged affair with Cassio. "For 'tis most easy/Th' inclining Desdemona to subdue/ In any honest suit/ She's framed as fruitful" (II.iii.319–21). By abusing Desdemona's kind nature in order to get what he wants, Iago proves that he has no concern, or empathy, for what happens to anyone else in the play, including the innocent Desdemona. Iago also utilizes Othello's trusting nature, Cassio's attractiveness, and Roderigo's love for Desdemona to further his scheme, disregarding any consequences that would occur because of his Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Good Vs Evil The thing that stood out the most to me was that the authors approached the concept of evil from many different angles. There was no one concise definition, cause, or kind of evil. Amongst all of these angles, an important point that almost all of the authors seem to touch on is the idea of evil and good being mutually exclusive. This idea proposes that there can be no evil without the opposing idea of good, and vice versa. The authors explored this idea in depth, and there were many different opinions on the matter. Some authors feel that humans are inherently good, while others believe we are inherently evil, and still others believe something entirely different. While all of the articles made important points and contributed to my general understanding of the concept of evil, I would like to focus on Eberts and Staub in this journal. Staub postulates that, "... human beings have the potential for both goodness and evil" (12). He suggests this after giving several examples of people who believe that people ...show more content... I find Staub's belief of a neutral human that can be swayed by circumstances, and Eberts' belief that free will impacts the relationship between good and evil to be interesting. With this in mind, I have come to several conclusions based on my personal beliefs. Firstly, good and evil cannot exist without each other, because humans can perceive the difference. Secondly, humans are not inherently good or evil. I also believe that circumstances do play an important role in the development of a person, but that people's choices (because we have free will) in these circumstances are what makes us good or evil. People subjected to the same circumstances will turn out on different ends of the good/evil spectrum according to how strong their wills are. Evil is not a set concept, nor is there a consistent scale by which good or evil can be measured by as it is Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Spiderman Good Vs Evil Essay t the end of the movie, Spiderman defeats the Green Goblin and enforces the motto that good triumphs over evil. This film conveys to the audience that it stands for honorable values such as strength, courage and love, as these are the ideals Spiderman stands for. However, the ending of the film also authenticates the notion that sometimes to overcome evil, the good guy must pay a price. This is evidenced in the last scene when Peter makes a brave and noble choice to say goodbye to his true love, Mary Jane. He knows that if he stays with her she may be in danger, so he sacrifices his desire for a future with her for her safety. Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
The Universal theme of good vs. evil The universal theme of good and evil is one of the most commonly used themes in literature. In literature some writers choose to directly state themes of confidence, while others allow them to indirectly develop. English literature often tends to concern itself more and more with the intended meanings of the work through common stories of good and evil those are holding specific symbolic meanings, whether these meanings represent good or evil, the readers continue to see the true meanings of select works. Writers most often develop works using themes of good and evil, whether they state them symbolically or directly. Readers may determine a theme as an idea, point of view, or perception, embodied and expanded upon in a work. Good and Evil in Terms of Religious Beliefs Good is usually associated with ideas of God. Evil is usually associated with ideas of the devil. When the writer conveys messages of good and evil, they commonly use the symbols of light and dark, or general opposites. Light, remaining the universal symbol of good, may be defined as love, happiness, or even as a heavenly presence. As Opposing to darkness which continues to represent evil as anything threatening, cold hearted, or aggressive. Light tends to expresses a positive affirmation while darkness carries the negative sense of chaos. In the Epic of Gilgamesh there are examples of good vs. evil such as the external values of pagan culture (heroism). Gilgamesh is a Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Good Vs. Evil : Good And Evil As Martin Luther said, "Good works do not make a good man, but a good man does good works; evil works do not make a wicked man, but a wicked man does evil works" (On Christian Library). The media is constantly flooded with a consistent stream of negativity. Currently in our small world we are fighting wars, preventing nuclear fallouts, and even protecting citizens from terrorist attacks. Notice that all of these instances share one common type of conflict: man versus man. The most common misconception is the difference between good and bad. What makes someone good; what makes someone bad? To some extent, there is good and bad in every person. Lead singer of the rock band The Animals, Eric Burdon, agrees. Burdon was quoted once saying, "Inside each of us, there is the seed of both good and evil . It's a constant struggle as to which one will win. And one cannot exist without the other" (BrainyQuote). The fact of the matter is the following: there are both good and evil in the world, but there is more than just one determining factor on whether a person or thing is good or bad. The most common associated word with good is perfect. Many people expect that if someone has good grades in school, a good family life, and a healthy social life that their life must be perfect. However, it could mean the quite opposite. What determines a healthy social life when no two people make the same relationships with others? How can you judge a good family life other than the fact they may Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Dr Jekyll And Mr Hyde Good Vs Evil Robert Louis Stevenson's Novella "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde", good vs. evil is the biggest theme. This story is seen as a metaphor about the good and evil in everyone, and the struggle of the two sides in everyone's personality. Since Hyde starts to take over, I could argue that evil is stronger than good. But, Mr. Hyde ends up dying in the end of the story, so I could claim that the good of someone can overcome the evil in you. Overall, Stevenson is trying to communicate with the reader about the balance of good and evil in humans, also that your balance of good and evil has different results/effects in your life. One of Stevenson's ways of communicating about the balance of good and evil is that suppressing one's desires and passions is a big cause of the troubles caused by the setting. The suppression in the novella is that in the area it's taken place ...show more content... For example, Utterson's curiosity for his good friend Jekyll makes him want to uncover the mystery of this evil man. Friendship acts as a motivator and enabler because his friendships help him discover crucial pieces of information. But on the contrary, the friendship between Lanyon and Jekyll isn't as good because it is mainly anger and arguing. Stevenson shows that your balance of good and evil can ruin friendships by having differences of opinions. Robert Louis Stevenson's communication of the balance of good and evil can be broken down to three simple things. One, when you're suppress your feelings and needs (the evil) it slowly starts becoming stronger and stronger until it takes over. Two, your appearance is affected by the way you choose to balance yourself. Three, friendships can be ruined or could help you when you need someone by having difference of opinions. In conclusion, balancing your good and evil sides of your personality can have big changes for you and the people around Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Lord of the Flies: Good vs. Evil Knowing William Golding took part of World War II, we as readers can understand why Golding wrote Lord of the Flies and other survival–fiction novels. When the story was released in 1954, Golding described his book as "an attempt to trace the defects of society back to the defects of human nature." It is unmistakably obvious to anyone who reads this book that Golding is trying to exaggerate the good and evil in the boys on the island. Throughout the book, we learn that people, including children, are not pure goodness. Deep inside there is an evil constantly trying to rise to the surface of our minds. Golding proves that eventually the evil within us will destroy us. Golding saw in World War II what ...show more content... Spill her blood." Realizing the signal fire went out, Ralph and Piggy make their way up to the boys' feast. Jack is too consumed with blood lust to care about rescue anymore. When he lashes out at Piggy is when the link between him and Ralph is destroyed Being ugly and having red hair, a traditional demonic feature, Jack is depicted as evil. He is also much like Hitler throughout the book. Jack's inherent evil is the cause of the fall of social order. Although Golding doesn't make any direct biblical parallels, he certainly uses them as penetrating motifs throughout the novel. Lord of the Flies opens in the Garden of Eden. On an island filled with ripe fruits, fresh, flowing water, has a luscious climate, and the boys are free to live as they want. They're free from sexual longing and deprivation. Like Adam and Eve, the boys are innocent. Golding describes Simon as the "Jesus" figure in the story. Simon happens to be on of Jesus' twelve disciples. Jesus later renamed Simon to Peter, which means "rock." Simon and Jesus share the same experience of mourning and mental suffering the night before their death. Simon, with his experience talking with the pig head and Jesus in his time in the Garden of Gethsemane. Unlike Jesus, Simon's death did not bring salvation to the island. It brought the boys deeper into savagery and guilt. After the boys were building the signal fire, it started to burn everything. That is the beginning of hell. The small boy with Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Arguments Against The Existence Of God The argument from evil (or problem of evil) is the argument that an all–powerful, all–knowing, and perfectly good God would not allow any or certain kinds of evil or suffering to occur. Unlike the logical argument from evil, which holds that the existence of God (so defined) is logically incompatible with some known fact about evil , the evidential (or probabilistic) argument from evil contends that some known fact about evil is evidence against the existence of God . For instance, one version of the argument contends that the biological role of pain and pleasure is much more likely on naturalism than theism (e.g., Paul Draper). Other versions of the evidential argument concede that God could have a morally sufficient reason for allowing certain evils to occur e.g., to ensure that some greater good is achieved as a consequence of an evil. However, proponents add, God would only allow as much evil or suffering as is absolutely necessary in order to achieve greater goods. But when we look at the world around us, we find prevalent instances of apparently gratuitous evil pointless evils from which no greater good seems to result. According to proponents, the existence of apparently gratuitous evil provides strong evidence that God (as traditionally defined) does not exist ...show more content... According to the unknown purpose defense (UPD), God allows apparently pointless suffering for some reason that we can't comprehend. The free will defense (FWD) maintains that God has to allow the existence of some evil in order to preserve human free will (e.g., Alvin Plantinga, Robert Adams). Finally, the soul–making theodicy (SMT) contends that God allows some evil because it builds positive character in the victims or in others which outweighs the negative value of the evil itself (e.g., John Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Essay Good versus Evil Good versus Evil Ever since the start of time, from stories being told by mothers to their children all the way through modern films, good versus evil has been a very common theme. Disney classic movies such as Aladdin, The Little Mermaid, Hercules, and many others would always have a plot centered on this idea, along with love, for little kids. The kids that watched the movies since they were little would always be glad to watch it again when they are older because it is a very simple theme that outstands the test of time unlike any other movie that's a trend now such as the annoying, overrated, Twilight series. At least for me I still love the Disney Classics and probably always will. In The Scarlet Letter there are many ...show more content... Showing good and evil ; Chillingworth, Pearl, and Dimmesdale all had an impression of one or the other. Chillingworth thought he was doing good for revenging Hester and himself by getting revenge on Dimmesdale. Hester at first was unsure if she wanted him to revenge her but quickly realized revenge was not the way. Hester and Dimmesdale deem Chillingworth as evil for torturing Dimmesdale even if Chillingworth believes he is doing good. Pearl is also viewed as good and evil. The towns' people believe that Pearl is a devil child for being the child of a sinner. Hester believes that Pearl was paid with the greatest treasure "Pearl keeps me here in life! Pearl punishes me too! See ye not, she is the scarlet letter, only capable of being loved" (pg. 103). Being faced with good and evil, just not as publicly, was Dimmesdale. Many saw Dimmesdale as a person that would never sin because of his powerful sermons believing him to be good. Dimmesdale on the inside though, thought he was the worst sinner of all, no one knowing his secret. He tortures himself by not sleeping or eating for days and through physical pain to deal with the sin he has committed. The book offers many examples of good versus evil and one of them is through the use of the setting. When hester looked at the suit of armor in governor Bellingham's home, all she saw was the scarlet letter. The suit of armor is symbolized as a noble, Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Good Vs Evil The writer could be questioning the modern society that people live in, such as: is it easy to be a Good citizen in the society around us, that's filled up with the competition and hatred. The writer wants his or her reader to think critically about the events that are going on, in the article and how it applies to the modern world humans live in today. The grandmother portrays the character of Good and Evil person in the story. However, it is important to walk a mile in another person's shoes to see what the person has been through in life, in order to determine ways to interact with that person and show empathy for the person. The grandmother did not show any sign of sympathy to anyone even her children. When she knew it was the wrong direction, they were taken to the secret panel house; she did not stop Bailey to warn him to turn back. Because of one person's makes everyone had to perish along with the grandmother. This mistake would have been prevented if she told the truth. The grandmother did not tell the truth, perhaps, she did not want to disappoint her grand children. Also, she wanted a form of interaction between her families or she ...show more content... Nonetheless, Misfit still holds grudges from his past life experience, this made him strong hearted not to forgive his past. He took revenge and angry at the innocent people and slaughtered them. I am wondering how the grandmother knew who the person was, or she was just acting out on her own intuition. Also, Misfit, started comparing himself with Jesus Christ, and he began justifying his evil actions, saying if he saw Jesus Christ raised someone from the dead, he would not be doing this evil deed. They both started arguing about Jesus Christ and the resurrection of dead people, if it actually happened or did Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Macbeth Good Vs Evil Essay Task 3 – Good Versus Evil (draft) Good morning/afternoon, today I will be discussing in depth a theme from the play Macbeth, written by William Shakespeare. The theme I am exploring today is good versus evil. Everyone is capable of doing good and evil things. The main character Macbeth portrays the theme good and evil . At the beginning of the play he is a heroic soldier, but as the play continues he executes various people to gain and maintain power, therefore displaying evil traits. He is fundamentally a good person but he's corrupted by his desire for power. Good versus evil is one of the most vital themes in the play. Characters who displayed good traits in the beginning are more evil towards the end. The theme is important in relation to the play because it's based around the concept of evil; therefore the play is dark and foul. This has an effect on the audience because people appreciate evil characters, as they can relate with them. The audience finds it interesting that the evil characters don't have the same morals that most people have. Evil characters also provide more action and drama to the scene so the audience is drawn to the excitement that they introduce to the story line. ...show more content... For an Elizabethan audience, the drama was around the fact that Macbeth had committed a major crime against God in disrupting the Divine Right of Kings. Kings and queens at this time were believed to be chosen by God, so Macbeth and his wife were interfering with God's plan. They related to this, as they were very religious at the time. The Roman Catholic Church was under attack and the movement against it was known as reformation. The Elizabethan audience can relate to the play Macbeth religiously because God influences the view and speech of the Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Compare And Contrast On Good And Evil In the world today, there have been many tragic occurrences that can be seen as evil, for example the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. On Wednesday February 14, 2018 Nikolas Cruz was charged with 17 counts of premeditated murder. Cruz, a former student of Stoneman Douglas, opened fire killing 17 and wounded many others. When looking at the situation, Many people argue about Cruz's motive. Authors like William Golding, would argue that Nikolas Cruz is a innately evil person, his true purpose was to hurt the kids. Whereas authors like, Gibran would argue that we, the people, failed Nikolas because all the signs showed that he wasn't mentally stable, but no one acted on reflecting that it was our faults. Both of these authors, have strong views of what is good and evil , which are reflected through their writings. In Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding, and "On Good and Evil", written by Kahlil Gibran, the two authors come up with their own depictions of good and evil. Through Golding's writing, he describes the evil within each person ...show more content... Gibran uses repetition of "you are good" which directly relates with the readers implying that there is goodness within each of us. Throughout the poem there are several different examples, such as "You are good in countless ways," and "You are good when you strive to give of yourself." (Gibran#) Both these examples make it seems as if he is talking directly with the readers taking it to a personal level to get his point across that there is goodness within everyone. Along with good there is bound to evil, but instead Gibran sees it differently. He sees evil as a effect of trying to do good. In one of the first line of the poems Gibran says, "For what is evil but good tortured by its own hunger and thirst? Verily when good is hungry it seeks food even in dark caves, and when it thirsts it drinks even of dead waters." Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Essay On Good Vs Evil Archetypes Most stories, movies, and myths have the simple archetype of Good vs. Evil. This particular archetype can often be confusing, because in stories the reader is often lead to believe that something or someone represents good or evil, but it does not. More often than not the evil character is either crazy or was raised wrongly. Evil characters in Good vs. Evil stories are often not truly evil but either mental unstable or not taught right from wrong. The entirety of the Inheritance series is based on two archetypes, Good vs. Evil and Man vs. Man. These two archetypes are the underlying archetypes. Each book also has its own archetypes that overlays the first two mentioned. One of the overlying archetypes, Crime pursued by Vengeance, is only overlying throughout the first three books of the series, Eragon , Eldest, and the 1st quarter of Brisingr . The main character 's ...show more content... Man, Woman vs. The Supernatural, and Woman vs. Self. The story also has the overlying archetypes of Revenge, Temptation, The Quest, Love, Maturation, and Transformation. In The Young Elites the main character is fighting a kingdom, herself, and other supernatural people. The main character also helps her lover take revenge upon his family, the royal family. Up until he dies, she is on a quest to exact that revenge. Along the way her ability to create illusions, along with the frequency with which she uses it, begins to degrade her mind she begins to hallucinate and become mentally unhinged. This is where the reader comes into contact with the Madness archetype. She goes through a period of maturation and transformation to become a powerful force, which overthrows the kingdom which fits in the Ascension archetype. The Good vs. Evil archetype is visible here in the main character vs. Her hallucinations which often coerce her into killing innocents. It is confusing because the evil force seems like the royal family, but it is not Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Beowulf Good Vs Evil Essay Good vs evil is a common theme that is evident in many epics and stories across all cultures and languages. It is especially evident in Beowulf by an unknown Anglo–Saxon author. In this epic, the hero Beowulf has accepted the challenge to kill a monster that is terrorizing Heorot, the mead hall owned by King Hrothgar of the Danes. The monster, Grendel , makes its trek to Heorot to kill Danish warriors as they sleep. Beowulf ends up slaying Grendel, and his mother. After, Beowulf returns to Geatland and meets his match when he has to fight a dragon that is angered by its stolen treasure. In Beowulf, the constant battles between good and evil are portrayed through the altercations amongst Beowulf and his enemies. Grendel is indirectly labeled as an evil force from the beginning when he attacks possibly innocent Danish warriors while they sleep. After Beowulf's encounter with Grendel's mother he "wrested the hilt from the enemies' hand, avenged the evil done to the Danes; it is what was due" (1668–1670). The author described the actions done to the Danes as evil. This is already hard proof that Grendel and his mother is the opposing and evil force against Beowulf. In all stories, God is always shown to be aiding the light or the good side. He is brought up many times throughout Beowulf, seeming to help Beowulf and his allies. As Beowulf ...show more content... Beowulf came to aid King Hrothgar because Beowulf owed Hrothgar for aiding Beowulf's father, this shows in honorability to repay his father's debt. During Beowulf's fight with Grendel, Beowulf puts away his weapon and shield to fight Grendel with his hands. Even though this proved to be far more effective than weapons, Beowulf's intention was to even out the fight, he "bore himself with valour; he was formidable in battle yet behaved with honour and took no advantage" (2177–2179). Beowulf's actions prove his honorability which many good characters/heroes in stories across cultures Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Good Vs Evil Research Paper Good vs. Evil The world can make or break us, but it depends on if they let society change your way of life and being. Innocence is a trait that we are born with they do not have enough knowledge to act in evil. It is the way people are raised, society and even human nature that enhances a negative toll on people. From birth we only learn what we are taught. If their r up bringing is full of corruption and tragedies you are most likely to have a heinous person. As stated in the article "Roots of Evil" "the unmistakable lesson is that ordinary 'good' people, devoted to their families, their religion and their country, are capable of inflicting horrific harm on those whom they dehumanize and demonize" (roots of evil, p10,pg 3 sharon begley). This meaning that people can easily be influenced by the people they trust in the most to lead them to make wrathful decisions, but, ultimately if a person was raised parentless , their outcome would be substandard due to the fact that they were never taught any morals and they could not contradict between right and wrong. Better yet, if a person has a very structured lifestyle with great parents that teach them good morals then there is a better chance they will turn out congenial. This goes along with society. "The danger of trying to explain evil is that we risk falling into the abyss of predestination: that given these life events, this social surround and ...show more content... "The mind is its own place, and in itself Can make a Heav'n of Hell, a Hell of Heav'n...Here we may reign secure, and in my choice to reign is worth ambition " (Paradise lost.120–21). This explaining humans can't be naturally born to act evil but it can In the end it is you how chooses if you do the evil thing or a good thing., People are generally born good, but there are many factors that can leave a person to act watchful. The way someone is raised has an impact as well as society and human Get more content on StudyHub.Vip
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help