Lab 4_ Magnetic Fields

pdf

School

University of Windsor *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1300

Subject

Electrical Engineering

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

15

Uploaded by PrivatePrairieDogMaster681

Report
Lab 4: Magnetic Fields iOLab Unit #4 Judy Jreda, Giulia Congi, Lysa Korusenge Monday, February 12, 2024
Introduction: In this lab, we will discover the characteristics of the magnetic field produced by a vertically positioned disc magnet. Unlike electric charges, magnets boast dual poles – north and south. Employing the iOLab device, we will examine the magnetic field around the disc magnet. The process involves precise alignment of the iOLab to measure Bx and By components at various locations, providing insights into the field's spatial dynamics. We will also investigate how the magnetic field strength evolves away from the magnet's face and edge. Through data collection, and analysis, we aim to gain an understanding of the nature of the magnetic field emanating from the disc magnet. Exercise 1. Map the Magnetic Field Around a Disc Magnet Standing on Its Edge : Introduction In Exercise 1, we initiated the exploration of the magnetic field around a standing disc magnet using the iOLab device. After calibrating the iOLab, we focused on measuring the magnetic field strength and direction at 12 distinct locations around the magnet's edge. By carefully aligning the iOLab to ensure one of the two components, Bx or By, read essentially zero, we pinpointed the direction of the magnetic field. Each measurement involved noting the orientation of the iOLab, capturing images for documentation, and drawing arrows on paper to visualize the field direction.
Exercise 1. Map the Magnetic Field Around a Disc Magnet Standing on Its Edge : Data Collection Figure 1.1. The Disc Magnet set up
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Figure 1.2. Image of iOLab and blank papers with our arrows indicating the direction of the magnetic field in each of the 12 locations
Exercise 1. Map the Magnetic Field Around a Disc Magnet Standing on Its Edge : Data Analysis Figure 1.3. Magnetometer plot of the side of the magnet (position 3). Smoothing of 5 used. Figure 1.4. Magnetometer plot of the side of the magnet (position 6)
Table 1.5. Raw data collected from generated highlighted region of the iOLab’s magnetometer plot reporting the magnetic field strength at each of the 12 locations position (ry) magnetic field (Bx) μT magnetic field (By) µ T 1 -13.891 -136.337 2 -21.019 -136.107 3 -0.737 -187.304 4 -9.787 127.407 5 10.168 111.739 6 0.410 115.040 7 210.810 265.038 8 6.67 637.137 9 0.338 628.651 10 -54.554 -325.223 11 -23.494 -349.327 12 0.614 -395.706 Exercise 1. Map the Magnetic Field Around a Disc Magnet Standing on Its Edge : Conclusion In Exercise 1, we used iOLabs magnetometer sensor to measure the magnetic field's direction and strength at twelve different spots, some closer and others to the side of the magnet. Moving
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
the iOLab away from the magnet caused the magnetic field's strength to decrease, shown by shorter arrows. The field's direction was determined: positive when aligned with the iOLab's sign convention and negative when opposite. Any field perpendicular to the axes was considered 0 μT. Possible errors included calibration issues and data collection differences. Exercise 2. Measure How the Magnetic Field Decreases Away from the Face of the Magnet : Introduction In Exercise 2, we started by taping the magnet to an object and aligning it with the iOLab's magnetometer. We then utilized the iOLab's wheel position and By sensor to measure the magnetic field as we slowly moved the iOLab cart away from the magnet (till 30cm) in a controlled manner. The resulting data showed fluctuations in the magnetic field strength, with distinct peaks indicating proximity to the magnet's face. By analyzing this data, we understand the magnetic field's behaviour and its decrease as the distance from the magnet increases. The process involved recording and documenting the entire motion. Exercise 2. Measure How the Magnetic Field Decreases Away from the Face of the Magnet : Data Collection
Figure 2.1. Image of our iOLab set up for exercise 2 Exercise 2. Measure How the Magnetic Field Decreases Away from the Face of the Magnet : Data Analysis Figure 2.2. Magnetometer and wheel-position plot Figure 2.3. Highlighted region of magnetometer and wheel-position plot for analysis
Table. 2.4. Data Table of raw data collected from generated magnetometer and wheel-position plot and the absolute data Position (ry) Position (ry) (positive) Magnetic Field By -0.018 0.018 3930.299 -0.02 0.02 3388.176 -0.022 0.022 2898.764 -0.024 0.024 2284.171 -0.026 0.026 2010.192 -0.029 0.029 1939.735 -0.033 0.033 1868.381 -0.036 0.036 1132.623 -0.038 0.038 992.791 -0.041 0.041 975.079
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Figure 2.6. Magnetic field strength vs. distance plotted graph using power law Exercise 2. Measure How the Magnetic Field Decreases Away from the Face of the Magnet : Conclusion A trendline was created from the data using a "power law," and the equation was shown with an R-squared value of 0.9677. We noticed that the power in the equation was negative, indicating an inverse relationship. This means that as the distance from the magnet increases, the magnetic field strength (in μT) decreases. The relationship between position and field strength, as indicated by the equation, was 1/ry^2. Potential errors in this experiment include iOLab calibration issues, variations in data collection methods, and using the iOLab on an uneven surface, which could affect the results.
Exercise 3. Measure How the Magnetic Field Decreases Away from the Edge of the Magnet : Introduction In Exercise 3, we started by following similar procedures as in Exercise 2, we taped the magnet to an object and aligned it with the iOLab's magnetometer, but this time using the Bx sensor. Using the iOLab's wheel position, we recorded the magnetic field strength as we gradually moved the iOLab cart away from the magnet's edge. Exercise 3. Measure How the Magnetic Field Decreases Away from the Edge of the Magnet : Data Collection Figure 3.1. iOLab set up for exercise 3.
Exercise 3. Measure How the Magnetic Field Decreases Away from the Edge of the Magnet : Data Analysis Figure 3.2. Magnetometer and wheel-position plot Figure 3.3. Selected area of magnetometer and wheel-position plot for analysis
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Table 3.4. Data Table of our Position Rx Raw, Absolute values and the Magnetic Field Bx. Position (rx) Position (rx) (positive) Magnetic Field Bx -0.02 0.02 839.534 -0.023 0.023 734.654 -0.026 0.026 622.536 -0.028 0.028 598.234 -0.031 0.031 455.346 -0.033 0.033 406.766 -0.04 0.04 231.635 -0.043 0.043 221.214 -0.045 0.045 207.435 -0.047 0.047 204.322
Figure 3.5. Power scatter plot of magnetic field strength vs distance using power law Exercise 3. Measure How the Magnetic Field Decreases Away from the Edge of the Magnet : Conclusion We fitted a trendline to the data using a "power law," and the equation displayed an R-squared value of 0.9569. The equation revealed a negative power, which aligns with the findings of experiment 2, indicating an inverse relationship. This means that as the distance from the magnet increases (measured in meters), the magnetic field decreases (measured in microteslas). The equation of the trendline suggests a relationship of 1 over the square of the distance. Similar sources of error were identified in this experiment as in experiment 2, including iOLab calibration, variations in data collection, and rolling the iOLab apparatus on uneven surfaces.
Overall Conclusion & Error Analysis In exercise one, the magnetic field of the iOLab was measured in 12 different spots. It is clear that as the iOLab moves closer to the source, the strength of the magnetic field increases and any location in which the iOLab was perpendicular to the source yielded a value of 0 μT. Possible errors may be due to an unlevel surface at different locations surrounding the source leading to inaccuracy in our values. It is also worth noting that due to the iOLab turning off in between data collection, it required various calibrations which can affect the interpretation of our results in between trials. Our results in exercise two agree with our conclusions in exercise one. In this exercise the source was tapped to a stationary object and the magnetic field was collected off the B y axis on the iOLab software as the iOLab was slowly moved away. A scatter plot of position vs magnetic field was made using excel and had a R 2 value of 0.9969. This indicates an inverse relationship between the two variables, meaning that as distance from the sources increases, the magnitude of the magnetic field decreases. Possible errors include calibration and uneven surface. In the final exercise, the process of exercise two was repeated collecting data from the Bx axis. The scatter plot for this graph had an R 2 value of 0.9569. This signified an inverse relationship, meaning that as distance from the source increased the magnitude of the field decreased. Similar errors from the previous exercise such as calibration and uneven surface should also be considered.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help