DC2-4

pdf

School

University of New Mexico, Main Campus *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

303

Subject

Economics

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

14

Uploaded by deandriavolley8

Report
Samantha’s utility function is U ( Y ) = Y 0.5 . She tries to maximize her expected utility. She owns a car f that she will have to replace if it is stolen. If her car is not stolen, her net income will be $122,500. stolen, her net income will be reduced by the car’s replacement cost of $20,100. The probability tha will be stolen is 20%. Use Excel to answer the following questions. a. Samantha learns that she can purchase an antitheft device that will lower the probability the car stolen to 10%. Would Samantha purchase the device at prices of $1,900, $2,000, or $2,100? b. Samantha can buy insurance that will pay the full replacement cost of the car if it is stolen. The p insurance is $4,090. For each of the prices of the anti-theft device given in part a, determine wheth would buy insurance, buy the anti-theft device, or buy neither. Explain why she would not buy both. c. If Samantha buys insurance, how much would the insurance company gain in expected value if the device was installed in Samantha’s car? d. The insurance company is willing to offer a rebate to Samantha if she purchases the antitheft dev However, the company would need to incur a monitoring cost to insure that Samantha installs and re device (to avoid moral hazard). If the price of the device is $2,000, determine the largest monitoring company would be willing to incur while still offering a large enough rebate to cover the cost of the How would your answer change if the price of the anti-theft device were $2,100? 1
for business If the car is at the car will be price of this her Samantha . e anti-theft vice. etains the g cost the device? 2
No insurance Outcome Probability Income Utility No Loss 0.8 122500 350 Loss 0.2 102400 320 Expected Utility 344 Price of anti-theft device 1900 Outcome Probability Income Utility No Loss 0.9 120600 347.28 Loss 0.1 100500 317.02 Expected Utility 344.25 Price of anti-theft device 2000 Outcome Probability Income Utility No Loss 0.9 120500 347.13109 Loss 0.1 100400 316.85959 Expected Utility 344.10394 Price of anti-theft device 2100 Outcome Probability Income Utility No Loss 0.9 120400 346.98703 Loss 0.1 100300 316.70175 Expected Utility 343.95850 Samantha’s utility function is U ( Y ) = Y 0.5 . She tries to maximize her expected utility. She owns a car that she will have to replace if it is stolen. If her car is not stolen, her net income will be $122,500. stolen, her net income will be reduced by the car’s replacement cost of $20,100. The probability th will be stolen is 20%. Use Excel to answer the following questions. a. Samantha learns that she can purchase an antitheft device that will lower the probability the car stolen to 10%. Would Samantha purchase the device at prices of $1,900, $2,000, or $2,100? 1. If the anti-theft device costs $1900, would Sa it or not? (i.e., Compare the expected utilities w without the device.) Yes, she would buy the device. 2. If the anti-theft device costs $2000, would Sa it or not? (i.e., Compare the expected utilities w without the device.) Yes, she would buy the device. 3. If the anti-theft device costs $2100, would Sa it or not? (i.e., Compare the expected utilities w without the device.) No, she would not buy the device. 1
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
for business . If the car is hat the car will be amantha buy with and amantha buy with and amantha buy with and 2
No insurance Outcome Probability Income Utility No Loss 0.8 122500 350 Loss 0.2 102400 320 Expected Utility 344 Full insurance coverage Price of Insurance 4090 Outcome Probability Income Utility No Loss 0.8 118410 344.10754 Loss 0.2 98310 313.54425 Expected Utility 337.99488 Samantha’s utility function is U ( Y ) = Y 0.5 . She tries to maximize her expected utility. She owns a car that she will have to replace if it is stolen. If her car is not stolen, her net income will be $122,500. stolen, her net income will be reduced by the car’s replacement cost of $20,100. The probability th will be stolen is 20%. Use Excel to answer the following questions. b. Samantha can buy insurance that will pay the full replacement cost of the car if it is stolen. The p insurance is $4,090. For each of the prices of the anti-theft device given in part a: $1900, $2000 and determine whether Samantha would buy insurance, buy the anti-theft device, or buy neither. Explain would not buy both. Use the calculations from part a. 1. If the price of the anti-theft device = $1900, would Samantha buy insurance, the anti-theft device, She would buy the anti-theft device because her expected utility would be maximized at $344.25. 2. If the price of the anti-theft device = $2000, would Samantha buy insurance, the anti-theft device, She would buy insurance because her expected utlity would be $344.10. 3. If the price of the anti-theft device = $2100, would Samantha buy insurance, the anti-theft device, She would buy insurance because her expected utlity would be $343.96. 4. For each of the above 3 cases, is it a better idea to buy both? Explain why she would not buy both. 2 ways to think about it: (1) You can calculate her expected utility of buying both for each of the abo (2) If Samantha buys the insurance which will reimburse her the full loss, does she need to buy the an device of $1900 (or, $2000 and/or $2100) to lower the probability of her car being stolen?) 1
device of $1900 (or, $2000 and/or $2100) to lower the probability of her car being stolen?) She would not buy both. If she bought both insurance and the anti-theft device, her income would de more because of higher costs. This will then lead to a decrease in expected utility. 2
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
for business . If the car is hat the car price of this d $2100, n why she e, or neither? e, or neither? e, or neither? . (There are ove 3 cases. nti-theft 3
ecrease even 4
Insurance Company's income, payout and profit No anti-theft device installed Outcome Probability Income Payout Profit No Loss 0.8 4090 0 4090 Loss 0.2 4090 20100 -16010 Expected Value of profit 70 Anti-theft device installed Outcome Probability Income Payout Profit No Loss 0.9 4090 0 4090 Loss 0.1 4090 20100 -16010 Expected value of profit 2080 Insurance company's gain from anti-theft device 2010 Samantha’s utility function is U ( Y ) = Y 0.5 . She tries to maximize her expected utility. She owns a car that she will have to replace if it is stolen. If her car is not stolen, her net income will be $122,500. stolen, her net income will be reduced by the car’s replacement cost of $20,100. The probability th will be stolen is 20%. Use Excel to answer the following questions. c. If Samantha buys insurance, how much would the insurance company gain in expected value if the device was installed in Samantha’s car? The company would gain $2,010 . 1
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
for business . If the car is hat the car e anti-theft 2
Maximum acceptable monitoring cost 10 Samantha’s utility function is U ( Y ) = Y 0.5 . She tries to maximize her expected utility. She owns a car that she will have to replace if it is stolen. If her car is notstolen, her net income will be $122,500. stolen, her net income will be reduced by the car’sreplacement cost of $20,100. The probability tha will be stolen is 20%. Use Excel to answer the following questions. d. The insurance company is willing to offer a rebate to Samantha if she purchases the antitheft dev However, the company would need to incur a monitoring cost to insure that Samantha installs and re device (to avoid moral hazard). If the price of the device is $2,000, determine the largest monitoring company would be willing to incur while still offering a large enough rebate to cover the cost of the How would your answer change if the price of the anti-theft device were $2,100? How would your answer change if the price of the anti-theft device were $2,100 instead of $2000? (i.e insurance company willing to offer a rebate to Samantha for purchasing the anti-theft device? If so, w maximum acceptable monitoring cost?) The cost of the device ($2100) exceeds the insurance company's ggain ($2010); this would mean there no cost acceptable to monitor Samantha when using the device. 1
for business If the car is at the car vice. etains the g cost the device? e., Is the what is the e would be 2
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Participation Statement Group: 4 Assignment Coordinator: Submission by: First Name Last Name Stefan Franco Raine Gavino DeAndria Gallegos James Gambling To avoid the free rider problem, the group coordinator of this data case assignment sh following participation statement by briefly stating the contributions of all members and agreements about this statement. Any member who didn't participate in this assignme meaningful manner will receive no credit as stated in the rubrics. If the assignment coo reasonable efforts to obtain the agreements of group members (for example, some e-m group can serve as evidence of notification) but still cannot get some by the due date, coordinator shall submit this assignment and will not be responsible for any misstatem 1
Contribution/Participation Part A Part B Part C Part D hould complete the d obtain their ent in any ordinator has made mails to the whole , the assignment ment. 2