3149 final

.docx

School

University of Ottawa *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

3149

Subject

Economics

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

8

Uploaded by BarristerSkunk523

The Answer of PART A (question 1) Introduction Confronted with the exigent global dilemma of climate change, the world stands at a critical juncture that demands prompt and efficacious measures. The prevailing legal frameworks and regulatory mechanisms have proven ineffectual in engendering a tangible decline in carbon emissions. This report delineates a novel governmental initiative, encompassing both legislative measures and fiscal incentives, aimed at cultivating a more salubrious environment. It undertakes a meticulous examination of the prospective benefits and costs, juxtaposes them with the existing paradigm, and employs Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) to articulate a definitive stance. Proposed Government Program Laws: Emission Caps: The imposition of rigorous constraints on industrial emissions, accompanied by punitive measures for transgressions. Clean Energy Standards: The statutory obligation to derive a specified proportion of energy from renewable sources. Incentives: Tax Incentives for Clean Technology: Fiscal concessions to incentivize corporate and individual investment in environmentally benign energy solutions. Grants for Research and Development: Allocation of funds to stimulate innovation in renewable energy and energy conservation technologies. Subsidies for Public Transportation: Financial encouragement to augment the utilization of public transportation, thereby curtailing emissions. Costs and Benefits Analysis Assumptions: The metamorphosis towards cleaner technology will transpire in a phased manner. Alignment with international climate objectives through global collaboration. The hypothetical costs and benefits are substantiated by empirical data where feasible. Direct Costs: Implementation and Compliance Costs: Expenditures incurred by businesses and governmental bodies in the execution and adherence to novel regulations. Potential Impact on Traditional Energy Sector: Transient economic repercussions on industries reliant on fossil fuels. Indirect Costs: Potential Job Loss: The conceivable attrition of employment in specific sectors. Short-term Economic Slowdown: Initial economic perturbations concomitant with the transition.
Direct Benefits: Reduction in Carbon Emissions: The realization of marked curtailments in greenhouse gas emissions. Health Improvements: The mitigation of pollution, culminating in enhanced public health. Technological Advancement: The nurturing of innovation within the realm of clean technology. Indirect Benefits: Long-term Economic Opportunities: The genesis of novel industries and employment avenues within the clean energy domain. Environmental Preservation: The safeguarding of ecosystems and diminution of climate-associated hazards. Conclusion and Position Using CBA The proposed initiative's multifaceted benefits, both immediate and ancillary, manifestly surpass the concomitant costs. While immediate economic apprehensions are not to be dismissed lightly, the enduring dividends in public health, technological innovation, environmental stewardship, and economic prospects are of paramount significance. The contention that the transition towards an environmentally sustainable paradigm is prohibitively costly neglects the overarching societal dividends and the latent prospects for sustained economic vitality. The ramifications of inertia, encompassing the perpetual degradation of climate, health, and prospective economic turmoil, are inordinately more grievous. Recommendation The proposed governmental scheme embodies a judicious and indispensable strategy to confront climate change. By assiduously weighing the costs and benefits and leveraging the analytical tools of CBA, the commitment to a cleaner environment transcends mere ethical imperatives, resonating as an economically prudent course of action. The audience, potentially skeptical, is exhorted to contemplate the holistic nature of this approach, its congruence with long-term societal aspirations, and the boundless potential for innovation and growth that this transformative shift heralds.
The answer of Part B (1456) 1. How does the issue of efficiency play out in a cost-benefit analysis framework? Efficiency in CBA is about ensuring that resources are allocated in a way that maximizes the net social benefit. It involves identifying, measuring, and comparing the benefits and costs of a policy, project, or program, and quantifying them in monetary terms. The Net Social Benefit (NSB) is calculated to identify the increase or decrease in welfare to society derived from alternative policies, programs, or projects. If the social benefits are higher than the social costs, the project should be accepted. Efficiency also relates to opportunity costs, where the value of the next best alternative use is considered. In CBA, this would be the next best project. Allocative efficiency is where resources are utilized in their best use within the economy, and CBA helps in identifying relative allocative efficiency. How does the issue compare between a public versus a private program? Private Sector: CBA in the private sector formalizes the investment process to ensure precise decision-making. It allows firms to analyze wider impacts, including opportunities for commercial profitability (benefits) and risks to reputation or branding (costs). External effects that may be harmful or beneficial to a company are captured. Public Sector: Public sector CBA is more complex and considers a multitude of stakeholders. It allows governments to effectively allocate scarce resources and provides a transparent framework for decision-making. Public sector CBA often considers market failure and non-monetary impacts, making it more challenging than private sector CBA. Externalities and broader societal impacts are key considerations in public sector CBA. The key difference is that private sector CBA often focuses on financial gains and losses, while public sector CBA takes a broader view, considering social welfare, externalities, and the overall impact on society.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help