Week02_Assignment_Angelini

docx

School

University of Scranton *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

505

Subject

Economics

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

6

Uploaded by AdmiralPencil3092

Report
Hannah Angelini Dr. Petsas IB 505 14 January 2024 1. Suppose that the U.S and Japan are two Ricardian economies. Both countries can produce only two goods; automobiles and computers. The characteristics of each economy are summarized in the following table.   Labor Productivity in Automobiles Labor Productivity in Computers Endowment of labor United States 20 10 100 Japan 15 4 200 You are asked by the CEO to report the following information: a. Graph the production possibility frontier of both countries with computers on the horizontal axis and automobiles on the vertical axis. Please label the axes and calculate the intercepts. Output of automobiles (US) = 20 x 100 = 2000 automobiles Output of automobiles (JAPAN) = 15 x 200 = 3000 automobiles Output of computers (US) = 10 x 100 = 1000 computers Output of computers (JAPAN) = 4 x 200 = 800 computers
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Production Possibility Frontier US Computers Automobiles 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Production Possibility Frontier Japan Computers Automobiles b. Identify absolute and comparative advantage of U.S. and Japan. Absolute Advantage: US has an absolute advantage in computer production as compared to Japan (1,000 > 800), and Japan has an absolute advantage in automobile production as compared to the US (3,000 > 2,000). Comparative Advantage: calculate opportunity costs For computers - (divide # of automobiles produced by # of computers produced) US: 2000/1000 = 2 automobiles
JAPAN: 3000/800 = 3.75 automobiles 2 < 3.75, so US has lower opportunity cost of computers US has a comparative advantage with computers in comparison to Japan because the US’s opportunity cost of producing a computer is lower than Japan’s. For automobiles – (divide # of computers produced by # of automobiles produced) US: 1000 / 2000 = 0.5 computers JAPAN: 800 / 3000 = 0.267 computers 0.267 < 0.5, so Japan has lower opportunity cost of automobiles Japan has a comparative advantage with automobiles in comparison to the US because Japan’s opportunity cost of producing an automobile is lower than the US’s. c. Suppose that these two countries engage in free trade. Identify absolute and comparative advantage. Describe the pattern of trade. Explain briefly your reasoning. The pattern of trade would be as follows. Since Japan has an absolute and comparative advantage in producing automobiles, they will produce those and export them, then import computers. For the US it would be the opposite because their absolute and comparative advantage is with computers. The US will produce and export computers, and import autos. d. Suppose that the relative price of computers in terms of automobiles after trade is 3 [units (number) of automobiles per unit (number) of computers]. Using the same diagrams as in question 1a graph the consumption possibility frontier for both countries. Do both countries gain from trade? Yes, both countries mutually gain from trade as the US can enjoy 1,000 more automobiles, and Japan 200 more computers.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Consumption Possibility Frontier US Computers Automobiles 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Consumption Possibility Frontier Japan Computers Automobiles 2. The U.S. market for computers is dominated by domestic firms such as Dell, Hewlett-Packard, and Apple. The U.S. market for consumer electronics is dominated by Japanese firms and brands such as Sony, JVC, Panasonic, Mitsubishi, and Toshiba. However, the U.S. automobile market includes both strong domestic firms like Ford and General Motors and formidable Japanese competitors like Toyota and Honda. e. Analyze each of the above mentioned industry from the standpoint of each country- based and firm-based theory of international trade discussed in this chapter. Which theory is the best predictor and which is the worst predictor of reality for these industries? Country based theories:
- Mercantilism: worst predictor because mercantilism discourages the idea of importing goods from another country, however, the United States relationship with Japan is one in which trade occurs. US will import goods from Japan and also export goods to Japan, but this allows for Japanese products to be in competition with US ones in industries like consumer electronics and automobiles. - Absolute advantage: Based on the domination of US firms in the production of computers it can be assumed that the US has an absolute advantage in that category, meaning they can produce more computers than Japan can. However, Japan seems to have the advantage with consumer electronics as most of those brands are from Japan. - Comparative advantage: Cannot really tell who has the comparative advantage in these industries because opportunity costs are not known, but the fact that Japan dominates the consumer electronic industry and is an active competitor in the auto industry, it is suggestive that they have a comparative advantage in those industries while US has it in computers. I would argue this is the best predictor of reality for these industries as countries will be best off by producing only the goods they have a comparative advantage in. Firm based theories: - Product life cycle: the 3 stages of a product; new product stage, maturing product stage, and the standardized product stage. It is important for goods to be successful in moving past the new product stage and that they can meet the demands of production or else the product will often fail. The necessary resources must be available, making this theory somewhat related to that of comparative and absolute advantages. Production of goods often shift to lower cost manufacturing sites, so in the case of the US, the parts of and computers itself of the leading brands in this industry are built outside of the US. - Country similarity: this theory deals with the intraindustry trade which is a god predictor of the automobile industry between the US and Japan. This happens between industries in varying countries who have similar consumer preferences. - New trade: this theory suggests that firms will get aggressive in trying to expand beyond domestic parameters as economies of scale occur. These occur when the average cost of a good the firm produces decreases as the output of that good increases. The theory is a good predictor of intraindustry trade as firms consistently try and create an advantage for themselves and can do so by entering the markets of countries around the world.
f. Do the same theories work as well in making predictions for those industries? Different industries will respond well to different theories depending on the actions and products of that industry. In this case, industries such as computers and electronics work well with multiple theories, both country based and firm based, mostly due to the fact that these products are ones that are traded between countries. g. Based on what you know about the Japanese market, decide whether the same pattern of competitiveness that exists in the United States for the computer, consumer electronics, and automobile industries also holds true for that market. Why or why not? I don’t believe the same level of competitiveness that exists in the United States market also exists in the Japanese market. There is a much wider range of diversity within the United States in comparison to Japan, which leads to a more competitive environment. The population in Japan is more homogenous, likely meaning the practices, culture, and minds of its people are more similar across the board than the population living in the US. This would create less competition as there is less discrepancy between the things people want and need, and the Japanese market is more likely to align with what the local preferences are. The popularity of automotive brands like Toyota and Honda is very high in Japan as these are domestically made vehicles and likely meet the needs of the consumers in that country. The competition of Toyota and Honda with all other automotive brands in the US is much greater as there is a more diverse culture and selection.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help