Week 5 questions

docx

School

Baker College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

101

Subject

Economics

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by ElderPencil11749

Report
1. Give a numerical example that illustrates total utility rising as marginal utility declines. Hailey gets $2 of utility from eating one donut and gets $1 of utility from eating a second donut in the same period. Her total utility rises from $2 to $3 as she eats the second donut, although her marginal utility falls. 2 . The law of diminishing marginal utility is consistent with the fact that people trade. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your answer. I agree to this statement because when does marginal utility received from the consumption of a particular commodity is falling for someone, he or she is likely to indulge in trade of this commodity with someone for whom the marginal utility is relatively greater. 3. “If we take $1 away from a rich person and give it to a poor person, the rich person loses less utility than the poor person gains.” Comment. May or may not be true. We don't know how much utility the person loses nor how much utility the poor person gains. 4. Is it possible to get so much of a good that it turns into a bad? If so, give an example. It is possible to consume so much of a good that it turns out into a bad good and the marginal utility becomes negative. This is according to the law of Diminishing marginal utility, which suggests that as a person increases the consumption of one good, after a certain point, the total utility decreases and the marginal utility becomes negative. 5. If a person consumes fewer units of a good, will marginal utility of the good increase as total utility decreases? Why or why not? Yes, if the marginal utility of the units of the goods no longer consumed was not negative. If a person eats 5 units of good X, and total utility is 40 utils and marginal utility is 6. If she consumes one less unit of X, or 4 units, total drops down to 34 utile but marginal utility rises to 7 utils. 6. The marginal utility of good A is 4 utils, and its price is $2. The marginal utility of good B is 6 utils, and its price is $1. Is the individual consumer maximizing (total) utility if she spends a total of $3 by buying one unit of each good? If not, how can more utility be obtained? No, they should consume more B & less A
7. Individuals who buy second homes usually spend less for them than they do for their first homes. Why is this the case? The law of diminishing marginal utility. The decision to spend less on a second home compared to a first home can be influenced by financial considerations, lifestyle changes, market conditions, and the specific purpose of the second property. Individuals may seek cost-effective options that align with their objectives for the second home. 8. Describe five everyday examples of you or someone else making an interpersonal utility comparison. Examples are comparison in case of buying a washing machine, cellphone of another person and ours, our vehicle and other persons and selecting a house compared to someone else’s house. It is a choice between the quality developed by education in our child as compared to other people’s children. Determination of the price of an ocean view house will depend on several factors like relevant price on the street of similar houses, popularity of the beach, privacy and front size facing the ocean. 9. Is there a logical link between the law of demand and the assumption that individuals seek to maximize utility? (Hint:Think of how the condition for consumer equilibrium can be used to express the inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded.) Yes. Individuals, seeking to maximize the utility they receive from the goods they purchase as well as the money they have to spend, will buy more of a good only if the price of that good reflects their diminishing marginal utility. 10. List five sets of two goods each (i.e., each set is composed of two goods; for example, diamonds and water make up one set) such that the good with the greater value in use has a lower value in exchange than does the good with the lower value in use. There are different sets of goods that fit in the paradox, such as milk packet and mobile phone, one month's tuition fees and a week of international holiday, a loaf of bread and a pair of expensive branded shoes, paying house rent and buying diamond jewelry, and money spent on a home-cooked meal for two and dining in a restaurant.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help