JT5kxst-SgmbtcUce6gj4g_e5493284ec9042f59f79b5b3bf61f3f1_CSE-535_Team-Assignment_Idea-Paper_Overview

The optional peer review is ungraded. Feedback is given by your peers who also submit their Idea Paper for review. Milestone 3: Idea Paper Submit your completed Idea Paper. This paper must outline a mobile computing problem and detail a unique solution. In your team paper, tackle a complex problem and propose a five-year plan to execute a solution. To determine whether the idea is unique, each team must read at least 5-10 papers in the domain of research. Evaluate how the idea is different from what is discussed in the research papers you read. Address these aspects of the problem and solution: ● Significance ● Relevance ● Novelty ● Soundness ● Feasibility Specifically, your team paper should answer these questions: 1. Why do we need to solve this problem? 2. Why is it related to Mobile Computing? 3. Why is the solution new? 4. Is the solution described technically sound? 5. Why will this solution take 5 years to complete? Your submission must follow these guidelines: ● Maximum length: four (4) pages ● Required format: Use the SigChi format provided in the Document-Formats.zip file. ○ Failure to use this format will result in a zero (0) grade for the paper. The Idea Paper is a team submission: only one (1) team member must submit it in the submission space found at the end of the week it is due. This paper is graded. The course team reviews the submission and assigns a grade based on the Idea Paper Rubric. Milestone 4: Idea Paper Teammate Review Individually rate your teammates' performances based on each member's Participation, Communication, and Contribution. Your answers will remain confidential. The teammate review is an individual submission. It is ungraded but required . All teammate reviews are checked by the course team.

Relevancy : Why is it related to Mobile Computing? 5.0pts Full Marks 4.0pts Good points in favor of relevance, but you did not address a point highlighted in the comments 3.0pts This problem seems relevant but the rest of the paper is not related to Mobile Computing. 2.0pts Not relevant to Mobile Computing at all. 0 pts No Marks Plagiarism Novelty : Why is the solution new? 5.0pts Full Marks 4.0pts Good points in favor of novelty, but you did not address a point highlighted in the comments 3.0pts The problem seems novel but the authors do not agree about it and have missed several novel aspects. 2.0pts Not novel. There exist several works like this. 0 pts No Marks Plagiarism Soundness of Solution: The solution described is technically sound. 5.0pts Full Marks 4.0pts Good points in favor of soundness, but you did not address a point highlighted in the comments 3.0pts The techniques discussed are good but the authors do not understand them or at least wrote something that confuses the reader. 2.0pts The techniques discussed are irrelevant to the problem and may not work. 0 pts No Marks Plagiarism Feasibility : Why will this solution take 5 years to complete? 5.0pts Full Marks 4.0pts Good points in favor of feasibility, but you did not address a point highlighted in the comments 3.0pts It is apparent that this solution will take many years to achieve but the authors did not argue about them in the paper. 2.0pts The solution can be achieved in less than 5 years. 0 pts No Marks Plagiarism