Discussion

docx

School

Ashford University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

406

Subject

Computer Science

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by DeaconIceGuineaPig5738

The debate over the scope of the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) responsibilities, specifically whether it should extend to natural hazards and threats, is complex and significant. Critics often debate that the DHS should focus exclusively on terrorism and man-made threats, therefore suggesting that natural disaster management could weaken the agency's focus and resources (Kapucu & Garayev, 2016). However, this perspective overlooks the fundamental connection between national security and the capability to respond to and recover from natural disasters. Integrating natural disaster management into the DHS's responsibility can enhance national security by ensuring a coordinated, efficient response to emergencies, which reduces the vulnerability of communities to both man-made and natural threats. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which falls under the DHS, plays a critical role in disaster preparedness, response, and recovery, demonstrating the collaboration between managing natural and man-made hazards (McCreight, 2009). This integration supports the argument that excluding natural hazards from the DHS's scope would destabilize its ability to protect the nation comprehensively. Additionally, the increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters, partly due to climate change, underscores the importance of including natural hazards in national security strategies (McCreight, 2009; Kapucu & Garayev, 2016). The impacts of these disasters extend beyond immediate physical damage, affecting economic stability, public health, and national resilience. Consequently, a all-inclusive approach to homeland security that includes natural disaster management is not only strategic but essential for safeguarding the well-being of the nation and its citizens. In conclusion, the claim that the Department of Homeland Security should not concern itself with natural hazards is very short-sighted. The consistent nature of threats in the modern world demands a broad, inclusive approach to national security, one that recognizes the critical importance of preparing for and responding to natural disasters. Integrating natural hazard management into the DHS's responsibilities increases the agency's ability to protect and serve the nation effectively. References: Kapucu, N., & Garayev, V. (2016). Structure and network performance: Horizontal and vertical networks in emergency management. Administration & Society, 48(8), 931-961. McCreight, R. (2009). Homeland security's role in addressing environmental and natural disasters: A new strategic approach required . Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 6(1).

Joshua, While I understand the complexity of DHS's authorization, diversifying its focus might weaken its effectiveness in critical areas, especially when it comes to natural disasters. The DHS, being made up of many different agencies, really has a huge challenge in keeping its priorities straight. However, separating its duties, as suggested, might not be the solution we desire. A unified approach, where interagency collaboration is strengthened rather than divided, could improve DHS's efficiency. For instance, integrating disaster response capabilities with infrastructure protection and cybersecurity could provide a more resilient framework against both natural and man-made threats. The integration of these functions can foster a more consistent and unified approach to homeland security, ensuring that the agency is not only prepared for challenges in today’s society but also adaptable to future uncertainties. This idea is supported by Waugh and Streib's (2006) study on the intergovernmental relations in emergency management, which emphasizes the importance of collaboration and coordination across different levels of government and agencies for effective disaster response. Similarly, Kapucu (2006) highlights the value of networked governance in homeland security, advocating for an interconnected and cooperative framework among various stakeholders to enhance disaster resilience and response capabilities. References: Kapucu, N. (2006). Public–nonprofit partnerships for collective action in dynamic contexts of emergencies. Disaster Prevention and Management , 15(4), 576-591. Waugh, W. L., Jr., & Streib, G. (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review , 66(s1), 131-140. Kody, Navigating the complexities of the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) structure in addressing security threats and natural disasters invites innovative perspectives. Thompson and Kelling (2021) advocate for a decentralized approach, suggesting specialized agencies could respond more adeptly to specific crises. Conversely, Patel and Smith (2022) highlight the strengths of interagency collaboration, arguing for improved coordination rather than dismantlement. This conversation guides us towards a carefully balanced solution that does not completely dismantle the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) nor keeps it entirely as is. Instead, it suggests refining DHS's structure to make it more agile and capable of responding broadly and effectively to emergencies. Such a balanced approach could enhance the effectiveness of homeland security by fostering both specialization and unity in facing national emergencies. References:

Thompson, J., & Kelling, G. (2021). Rethinking Homeland Security: A Path to Enhanced Agility. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 13(4), 67-75. Patel, R., & Smith, J. (2022). Interagency Collaboration in National Security: Challenges and Opportunities. Security Studies Quarterly, 18(2), 112-129.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Related Documents

Module 1 Guidelines Part 1.docx

1 - Naive Bayes Classifier in Machine Learning - Javatpoint.pdf

Assessing Technology-Based Resources for Differentiation Topic 2.docx

3 - K-Nearest Neighbor(KNN) Algorithm for Machine Learning - Javatpoint.pdf

2 - Decision Tree Algorithm in Machine Learning - Javatpoint.pdf

WWW Information Hunt- How Computers Work and other Questions.docx

solutions1_2021.pdf

MIS HW 3 OBrien Meaghan.docx

“Sons of Stuxnet” paper mod 2.docx

CS122aF21Midterm2(3PM)Solution.pdf

assignment2.pdf

2.3.7 Packet Tracer - Answers.docx

Recommended textbooks for you

Principles of Information Security (MindTap Cours...

Computer Science

ISBN:9781337102063

Author:Michael E. Whitman, Herbert J. Mattord

Publisher:Cengage Learning

Management Of Information Security

Computer Science

ISBN:9781337405713

Author:WHITMAN, Michael.

Publisher:Cengage Learning,

Principles of Information Systems (MindTap Course...

Computer Science

ISBN:9781305971776

Author:Ralph Stair, George Reynolds

Publisher:Cengage Learning

Fundamentals of Information Systems

Computer Science

ISBN:9781337097536

Author:Ralph Stair, George Reynolds

Publisher:Cengage Learning

Information Technology Project Management

Computer Science

ISBN:9781337101356

Author:Kathy Schwalbe

Publisher:Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS

Recommended textbooks for you

Principles of Information Security (MindTap Cours...
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337102063
Author:Michael E. Whitman, Herbert J. Mattord
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Of Information Security
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337405713
Author:WHITMAN, Michael.
Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Principles of Information Systems (MindTap Course...
Computer Science
ISBN:9781305971776
Author:Ralph Stair, George Reynolds
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Fundamentals of Information Systems
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337097536
Author:Ralph Stair, George Reynolds
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Information Technology Project Management
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337101356
Author:Kathy Schwalbe
Publisher:Cengage Learning