12-Lab Report-Hemacytometer_2023

docx

School

Colorado State University, Fort Collins *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

212

Subject

Biology

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by PresidentRamPerson1540

Report
LIFE 212 Laboratory Report 12 Name: _____________________________ Due: _____________________________ Section: _____________________________ The Hemocytometer Determining Density and Viability of Cells in Suspension 50 pts total plus Notebook Conclusion (4 pts) Understanding the cell counting procedure is important for cell culture and virology studies. Accurate cell densities must be determined for successful cell culture of mammalian, plant and insect cell culture. In modern research labs, automated cell counters and/or flow cytometry can be used to measure cell density. This exercise will give you experience in the thinking processes required for simple experimental design and for manual cell counting. Read over the Kendall-Hunt background material. Features of a good experimental hypothesis- Clearly stated Testable Specific Easily understood Directions. 1. Experimental goal: Determine the best treatment that could be used to kill about 50% of mouse 3T3 cells in suspension. 2. Lightly vortex the cells to mix. 3. Control cells- a. Pipette 20 ul cells into a new tube. b. Add 20ul trypan blue to the cells. c. Set up the hemacytometer with the special rectangular cover slip and add 10 µL of the stain/cell suspension into each groove for loading into both counting chambers. d. Count 5 squares per counting chamber in both counting chambers. Record the number of clear and blue cells in each square in the table below. e. Use the equation below to determine the # cells per square. 4. Experimental treatment a. Choose an experimental treatment. The GTA can advise you on the best approach to take. i. Lightly vortex cells. Pipette 100ul cells into new tube. ii. Treat with adverse substance expected to kill ~50% of cells. iii. Record treatment type in Table below. iv. Return to your bench. b. After treating your cells- i. Pipette 20 ul treated cells into a new tube. ii. Add 20ul trypan blue to the cells. iii. Set up the hemacytometer with the special rectangular cover slip and add 10 µL of the stain/cell suspension into each groove for loading into both counting chambers. iv. *** If the treatment did not kill at least 30% of the cells, repeat the treatment or alter the conditions. *** If the treatment killed over 80% of the cells check with the GTA before proceeding. v. Once you’ve identified an appropriate treatment, count 5 squares per counting chamber in both counting chambers. Record the number of clear and blue cells in each square in the table below. c. Use the equation below to determine the # cells per square.
LIFE 212 Laboratory Report 12 Name: _____________________________ Due: _____________________________ Section: _____________________________ Note the large squares in the counting chamber below. Use this equation to calculate the cell density- # cells in 10 squares * 1000/mL * dilution factor = # cells per mL Figure 1: 3T3 CAR cells (blue and clear circles) on a single hemocytometer counting chamber. Each slide contains 2 chambers. Remember, dead cells are stained blue because they are unable to exclude the trypan blue, whereas living cells are colorless. 1. Record the number of cells as you count them in each of the indicated squares of the hemocytometer. (10 points) Experimental treatment: _________________ (1 pt) A. Control: (4 points) # of Live Cells (clear) # of Dead Cells (blue) Chamber1 Chamber 2 Chamber 1 Chamber 2 Square 1 Square 2 Square 3 Square 4 Square 5 Total Total # of Cells in 10 Squares Number of Cells per mL
LIFE 212 Laboratory Report 12 Name: _____________________________ Due: _____________________________ Section: _____________________________ B. Treated Cells: (4 points) Treatment Type: ____________________ (1 points) # of Live Cells # of Dead Cells Chamber1 Chamber 2 Chamber 1 Chamber 2 Square 1 Square 2 Square 3 Square 4 Square 5 Total Total # of Cells in 10 Squares Number of Cells per mL 2. Frame the experimental goal and the chosen treatment method as a single hypothesis using the guidelines above (2 pts). 3. Define cell viability and explain its significance in the context of our experiment. (How did we assess viability?) (2 points) . 4. Draw experimental conclusions. How effective was the experimental treatment? Could the chosen cell killing treatment have been improved further? (Keep in mind the goal was to kill at about 50-75% of the cells). Justify your answer. If you think this treatment didn’t need to be improved further, explain why you think it was effective. (6 points) 5. Show one sample calculation for a) live and b) dead cells/mL that you used to fill in Table A and B above. (8 points)
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
LIFE 212 Laboratory Report 12 Name: _____________________________ Due: _____________________________ Section: _____________________________ 6. Calculate the percentages of live and dead cells in each of the control and the treated sample. Show your work. (10 points) a. b. 7. Assume that the negative control cell suspension was diluted 10 times in saline solution. Calculate the total number of cells in 50 ml of the original undiluted cell suspension, using the cell numbers provided. Show your work. (6 points) 8. Assume that the 1 mL cell suspension that we gave you has been diluted 10 times in saline solution. If we have a total of 20 mL of undiluted cell suspension, calculate the total number of cells in our original undiluted cell suspension? Show your work. (6 points)
LIFE 212 Laboratory Report 12 Name: _____________________________ Due: _____________________________ Section: _____________________________ Notebook Conclusion (4pts) The conclusion should be a concisely written summary of the experimental results using technical language. Describe each objective from your Introduction individually and frame in context with the experimental results. Vague and/or incomplete conclusions will not receive any credit.