HW 7 - Evan Klein

pdf

School

University of Michigan *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

102

Subject

Astronomy

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

4

Uploaded by DeanMusic10138

Report
Problem 1 Table and Graph: Table 1: Main sequence Stars Star Name Lum. (Sol) Mass (Sol) Diam. (Sol) Lifetime Sirius 25 2 1.7 Rigil Kent. 1.5 1.1 1.2 Vega 37 2.1 2.3 Procyon 7.7 1.5 2 Achernar 3300 7 10 Altair 10.6 1.8 1.8 Pollux 32 1.9 8 Fomalhaut 17.7 2.1 1.8 Regulus 150 3.5 3.2 Castor 30 2.2 2.3 Elnath 70 4.5 5.5 Miaplacidus 210 3 5.7 Alnair 380 4 3.6 Alioth 108 3 3.7 Kaus Aust. 375 5 7 Alkaid 700 6 1.8 Menkalinan 48 2.4 2.8 Alhena 160 2.8 4.4 Peacock 2100 5 4.4
Problem 2: L = 1.78*M^3.66 The equation shows that mass and luminosity are exponentially proportional and that when we raise mass to the 3.66 power and multiply by 1.78, we get a pretty accurate estimate of luminosity. Alpha in this equation = 3.66 which is similar to the expected 3.5 exponent. I think that the dataset I used had a very clear correlation and that it would be hard for this obvious correlation to yield a vastly different exponent than what is expected. Problem 3: Beta = -2.66 T = M^-2.66 T = 5.62*M^-2.66 Beta = 2.66 The expected formula is nearly identical to the actual formula and they have the same exponent.
Problem 4: 1. Based on your data and graphs; how does the luminosity of stars vary with their mass? The luminosity of stars is positively exponentially related to its mass by an exponent of about 3.66. This means that as mass increases, so does luminosity 2. Also based on your data and graphs; how do the lifetimes of stars vary with their mass? The lifetimes of stars is inversely exponentially related to the mass of stars with an exponent of about -2.66. This means that as mass increases, lifetime decreases. 3. Based on your answers to the previous questions; how do the lifetimes stars vary with their luminosity? Explain your answer. Since we know that mass and luminosity are positively correlated, and mass and lifetime are negatively correlated, when luminosity increases, lifetime decreases. Problem 5: 1. More massive main sequence stars are _____ than less massive ones. A. more luminous (brighter). B. less luminous (dimmer). C. [there is no correlation 2. More massive main sequence stars have ______ hydrogen fuel to burn than less massive ones. A. more B. less C. [there is no correlation] 3. More massive main sequence stars live _____ lives than less massive ones. A. longer B. shorter C. [there is no correlation]
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
4. More luminous (brighter) main sequence stars live _____ lives than less luminous (dimmer) ones. A. longer B. shorter C. [there is no correlation] 5. The reason(s) for the answers to questions 3 and 4 is (are) A. that more massive stars last longer because they have more hydrogen fuel to burn. B. that more massive stars have more fuel, but because they are hotter and brighter they burn it more quickly. C. [neither of the above-there is no correlation]