MiniAssignment4_Phylogenet_Charleewessels

pdf

School

Texas A&M University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

207

Subject

Anthropology

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

Uploaded by PrivateThunder5144

Mini Assignment 4: Phylogenetic Trees with Sauropodomorphs Phylogenetics is a fascinating area of study that traces the evolutionary history and relationships among individuals or groups of organisms. Imagine it like a detective story, where scientists piece together clues from fossils, genetics, and other evidence to unravel the intricate web of life's history. This history is often depicted in a diagram known as a 'phylogeny', a kind of family tree that shows the relationships between different species or groups. For this mini-assignment, we'll be delving into the world of the largest land animals that ever lived: the sauropodomorphs, a group of long-necked dinosaurs that included famous members like Brachiosaurus and Diplodocus. You'll be given an existing phylogenetic tree, a sort of dinosaur family tree, which was created based on the current understanding of how these giants are related to each other. Using character information, you will place additional taxa on the tree and map how size evolved across the sauropodomorphs. This exercise will not only help you understand the fundamentals of phylogenetics but also expose you to the dynamic and ever-evolving nature of scientific knowledge. Below is the phylogenetic tree we will use in this assignment. This diagram corresponds to the current understanding at large about relationships among sauropodomorphs. Each branch leading to a branching node has been labeled with a letter. See the next page for a table that gives the name of the taxonomic group this branch corresponds to, and the derived characters (synapomorphies) that denote a typical member of that group. Figure 1. Phylogeny showing relationships among 12 sauropodomorphs.

Table 1. Character Changes and Branch Details Node Label (Clade) Corresponding Name of Clade Typical Derived Characters of This Clade A Gravisauria Quadrupedal limb proportions (forelimbs as long or longer than hind limbs) B Eusauropoda Metacarpal bones in forelimb become U-shaped cylindrical pillar, wrist becomes locked in place. Most lose most front toe bones except for a single large ‘ungual’ claw. C Neosauropoda Laterally flared ilia (hip bones) to expand gut space. Teeth shift to front of mouth and now occlude (for browsing rather than chewing). Loss of external mandicular fenestra in jawbone. D Diplodocoidea Loss of suture between pre-maxilla and maxilla in skull. Most descendants have flat snout end. E Flagellicaudata A new depression in the skull in front of the eye sockets (Preantorbital fossa). Most members of this group have long whip-like tails, but not all. F Macronaria Very large naris (openings for nostrils) on the top of their skull, larger than their eye orbitals. G Titanosauriformes The large air cavities in presacral neural arch become more finely divided, about 1-cm in scale. H Somphospondlyii Presacral neural arch pneumatization is very spongy and finely divided, less than 1-cm in scale. I Titanosauria Loss of all front toes, extra-wide flared hips, a gracile (skinny) humerus, and many titanosaurs are found with remains of osteoderms, small bony lumps that formed in their skin. The tail becomes short and connections between caudal (tail) vertebrae become rounded (‘procoelus’). J Lithostrota ? Extra wide cervical vertebrae. Most titanosaurs with osteoderms are in this group, but not all.

1) Using the information shown on the labeled phylogeny, and tables 1, add Apatosaurus to the tree on the next page, which is identical to the phylogeny on the first page, but does not have labeled branches. Apatosaurus is a ‘sister taxon’ of one of the sauropods already on the tree, so you can draw it in as a branch attached to the end-branch leading to that taxon. (A clade composed of two taxa are referred to as ‘sister taxa’ in phylogenetics.) Key characters of Apatasaurus, a late Jurassic sauropod:  long-tailed  long snout with a flat end  preantorbital fossa present  unpaired neural spines Which is the sister taxon? 2) Explain what characters (morphological traits) helped you place Apatosaurus. What characters does Apatosaurus share with its closest relative (its sister taxon)? 3) Next, add Argentinosaurus to the tree on the next page. Argentinasaurus is believed to be the largest sauropod yet found, but is known only from fragmentary remains from the Cretaceous of Argentina. Like Apatosaurus, Argentinosaurus is a sister taxon to another sauropod taxon used a ‘tip taxon’ for this tree. Key characters of Argentinasaurus:  Cervical vertebrae show tiny air cavities (less than 1 cm in size)  Long neural spines on posterior vertebrae.  A ‘skinny’ humerus  Fragments of a very wide pelvic girdle Which is the sister taxon you chose? Was there another sister taxon you considered? Which? 4) Explain what characters or morphological traits you used to place Argentinosaurus. What character information led you to place it where you did? What uncertainties did you have in your placement? The sister taxon of the Apatosaurus is the Diplodocus and they are both in the The sister taxons share the presence of preantorbital fossa and have whipped like tails. It is a sister taxon to the diplodocus because the other taxons in this clade have spike like features on their back. While these do have spines but they are more neutral and unpaired. I chose the Patagotitan as the sister taxon. Yes, all the other sister taxons in the Titansauria were in consideration because of the similarities,but the Patagotitan had more similarities. The size lifted somewhat threw me o ff but I decided to focus more on the other characters given. The skinny humerus led me to the Titansauris clade and from there I was able to limit the sister taxon down to the similarity of long posterior vertebrate spines.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Figure 2. Use this tree to show how you think Apatosaurus, Argentinosaurus, and Mamenchisaurus might relate to other species of sauropodomorph dinosaurs.

5) Add Mamenchisaurus to the phylogenetic tree on the previous page. Mamenchisaurus was a middle/late Jurassic sauropod known only from China. This sauropod genus could be connected anywhere on the tree, but see the characters below. Key characters of Mamenchisaurus:  18 extremely long cervical vertebrae, giving it a disproportionately long neck  External mandibular fenestra  Teeth that hadn’t migrated to the front of the jaw  Large nares  Box-shaped skulls  Extremely pneumatized cervical vertebrae, with air cavities less than 1 centimeter in size What is the sister taxon you chose? Was there an alternative sister taxon you considered? Which? 6) Explain what characters or morphological traits you used to place Mamenchisaurus. Does this placement suggest any complicated evolutionary histories, such as convergent evolution, for some traits? Which traits might be convergent (i.e. the same traits evolved independently in different lineages)? I chose the Sauroposedion as the sister taxon. I was very in between the brachiosaurus and the sauroposiden. In the end I went with the Sauroposedion because the brachiosaurus also has a lot of similar characteristics but not as many as the sauroposiden. I used the facts about the boxy skull and pheumatication less than 1 cm to help me place the memechisaurus because that was the only similar characteristics. The clade that I placed it into is a very large clade, so with the use of evolution, the vast amount of possible sister taxons made it a little di ﬃ cult, especially since some of the only traits were the long necks and having a skull to not.

Table 2. Taxon Information Regarding Size, Dentition, Ecology, Preservation. Genus Estimated Mass Neck Length Teeth Shape Notes Plateosaurus 600 – 4000 kg ~2 m Leaf-Shaped Bipedal Vulcanodon 3000 – 4000 kg 2 – 3 m Unknown Early quadrupedal sauropodomorph from South Africa. No skull known. Cetiosaurus 9000 – 18000 kg 5 – 7 m Spoon-like No skull known, but some teeth found along other bones. Nigersaurus 3000 – 5000 kg 2.5–3 m Pencil-like No side teeth, front teeth are arranged into teeth battery where they were constantly replaced. Regained mandibular fenestra. Amargasaurus 2600 – 5000 kg 2–2.5 m Pencil-like Has long, paired neural spines. Diplodocus 10000 – 15000 kg 6–7.5 m Pencil-like Had a single row of long neural spines. Camarasaurus 15000 – 23000 kg 5 – 6 m Spoon-like Brachiosaurus 28000– 62000 kg 9–12 m Chisel-like Only known from very fragmentary finds – close relative Giraffatitan is more complete and used in its place. Sauroposeidon 40000 – 60000 kg 11–12 m Unknown Thought to look very similar outwardly to brachiosaurs. No skull known. Patagotitan 55000 – 77000 kg 8–11 m Unknown Had long posterior neural spines. No skull known. Alamosaurus 50000 – 73000 kg 7 – 9 m Peg-like Abundantly known from the end of the Cretaceous in North America. However, no skull known. Saltasaurus 6800 – 7800 kg 3 – 4 m Peg-like Apatosaurus 16000 – 22000 kg 7–8.5 m Chisel-like Argentinosaurus 70000 – 100000 kg 7–10 m Unknown Very fragmentary remains – no skull known, only vertebrae, legs, hip. Mamenchisaurus 13000 – 15000 kg 9–11 m Spoon-Like Description of Teeth Shapes Chisel-like: Spatulate teeth with a flat, rounded end, like a chisel. Leaf-shaped: Broad, spatulate teeth with multiple ridges or points, like a pointed leaf. Peg-like: Short and cylindrical teeth. Pencil-like: Long and cylindrical teeth. Spoon-like: Spatulate teeth with a rounded bowl-like depression. Notice that these definitions aren’t very precise. In particular, the line between peg-like and pencil-like is vague. Keep in mind which shapes are probably easier to ‘evolve’ from other sauropod teeth shapes.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

7) On the phylogeny labeled ‘Figure 2’, annotate the tooth shape of each dinosaur listed in Table 2 by marking their name with a symbol, color, or some other label. Include the three taxa you added yourself, Apatosaurus, Argentinosaurus and Mamenchisaurus. You may use any media you like: colored pencils, crayons, colored pen, a colored painting tool (on a tablet), emoji, letters, whatever works best for you. Note that no teeth are known from some species, so be creative and find a way to visually indicate which have a known tooth shape and which have an unknown ‘mystery’ tooth shape. Based on known tooth shape as mapped onto the phylogeny in figure 2, how many times do you estimate that tooth shape must have changed in the sauropodomorph dinosaurs? (Please remember to indicate tooth shape on the evolutionary tree in Figure 2.) 8) You should notice that evolution of sauropod tooth shape seems to follow a particular sequence of change from one tooth morphology to another, with no apparent reversals. This trend can be observed occurring independently in both the Diplocoidea and the Macronaria. What selective pressures might be driving the evolution of tooth shape? (Note: Please remember that all sauropods are strongly believed to be herbivores.) The sauropodomorph dinosaurs changed five times throughout the phylogeny. The enviroment and diet changes may have been key factors to the changes of the teeth shapes. These sauropods lived in many di ff erent environments over the years they inhabited Earth, so depending on the location, their teeth shape was forced to adapt to help them survive.

9) Texas sauropod tracks from the Cretaceous (A, on the left) are known for being wide-gauge, with some distance between the left and right trackways, unlike Jurassic trackways (B, right example, from Portugal). Look over at your phylogeny and the character data, and consider what this implies about the physical traits of different sauropod lineages. Which traits might reflect having a wider body? Which lineages might have those traits, and thus indicate which sauropod lineage is the wide- gauge track maker? What additional evidence in the trackways you might look for to verify your hypothesis of which sauropod makes the wide-gauge trackways? The producer of these trackers falls under the Lithostrots clade. If I had to guess of a taxon in that clade I would have to say the Alamosaurus. They are known to be from the Cretaceous period and inhabited North America. They are also known for having extra large hip to help with their large size, and explains the large tracks. The foot shape and estimated size of the sauropods feet, could have helped when deciding a taxon and clade that these track could have possibly belonged to. The wide hip characteristic helped a lot when deciding, but having more information on the feet would have been more helpful.

MiniAssignment4_Phylogenet_Charleewessels

Related Documents