#37 Interpreting the Results (exercise)

.docx

School

University of Akron *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

100

Subject

Anthropology

Date

May 2, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by MajorFangVulture35

Interpreting the Results (exercise, 20 points ) Given the data sheet that Lucas sent to Dr. Matney, and the chapter that you read on dating techniques you are ready to discuss with the team the laboratory results from the University of Arizona radiocarbon laboratories. Before the meeting, you quiz yourself of the basics, and your reading of those complicated charts Dr. Matney sent out. You feel like you are perhaps in the deep end of the swimming pool. 1. _________________________ are methods that assigns a specific date in calendar years or other conventional system to an archaeological material or feature. Typically, in archaeology these dates are given in years BC/BCE, AD/CE, or BP. Calibrated dates are in cal BP, or cal BC/AD. Circle one. ( 2 points ) a. relative dating b. seriation c. absolute dating d. varve dating e. index fossils 2. Which materials can be tested using radiocarbon dating techniques? Circle one. ( 2 points ) a. wood b. bone c. stone d. all of the above e. only (a) and (b) 3. What event does radiocarbon dating actually date? Circle one. ( 2 points ) a. the construction of the artifact using organic materials b. the last use of an artifact, ecofacts, or as part of a feature, such as a building timber c. the date at which an archaeologist recovered the material from an archaeological context d. the point of death, when the organism (such as a tree) stopped exchanging carbon e. none of the above 4. Based on the University of Arizona data sheet and explanation in #36 Carbonized Wood, what is age of the samples as reported in radiocarbon years BP? Include the +/- range. ( 2 points ) Sample zt37412 ____________ 4518+/-28 __________________ 14C age BP Sample zt 20440 ____________ 426+/-25 _________________ 14C age BP 5. Based on the calibration results from OxCal, what are the ranges of calibrated dates in years BC for each of the samples? ( 2 points ) Sample zt 37412 ___ 3358 _______-___ 3268 ________ cal BC and _____ 3246 ______- ___ 3101 _________ cal BC Sample zt 20440 ____ 1427 ______-___ 1495 ________ cal AD and ___ 1601 ________- ____ 1611 ________ cal AD 6. The earliest radiocarbon dates were run at Ziyaret Tepe in 2001. Below are the results of a radiocarbon sample taken from the Brightly Burned Building (BBB) in the Operation E step trench and
run in 2004. They were calibrated by the lab (Arizona NSF) and reported at time with both 1 and 2 standard deviation ranges, as seen in the original printout below. 2004 calibration results Seventeen years later, I recalibrated those results using OxCal 4.4 (as described earlier). The results are below: 2021 calibration results Considering only the 2 SD (standard deviation, 2 sigma, 95.4%) results from 2004 and 2021, compare the calibrations of these radiocarbon counts. Note: the samples were not re-run at the lab, I am just performing new calibration calculations on the original 2004 laboratory results.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help