Tech-157 Lab 55 (1)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Humber College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
157
Subject
Aerospace Engineering
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by DeaconPartridgeMaster673
DO NOT WRITE IN THIS BOX
Please review ALL PAGES of this Lab before you attend your In-person Lab Session.
It is preferable that you print-out ALL PAGES of this Lab, and “Tech-157 Connect to LVProSim and LabVolt Interface” and bring the printouts to your In-person Lab Session.
Title
Page
&
Checklist
(to
be
completed
by
Student)
Lab Number:
5, In-person
Title: Rotameter and Paddle Wheel Flow Meter
Date the Lab was performed (mm-dd-yy): 02-09-24
Student Number: N01594193 Name of student (First Name Last Name): Ugur Dag Group of Student: 0EG (In the Format = Tech-157-XXX, where XXX = YOUR Group such as 0AB, 0EA etc.)
Professor:
Zhengrong Chu
Course:
Tech-157
1.
Complete THIS PAGE = Page 1 (Title Page & Checklist)
2.
Complete Page 5, Page 6, and Page 7
3.
Scan and create .pdf of Page 1 (Title Page & Checklist), Page 5, Page 6, and Page 7
4.
Combine ALL Pages of your Lab Report into a SINGLE .pdf file. Meaning, do not submit Page(s)
of your Lab Report as separate files
5.
This Lab Report file must be named in the following format: Lab 5, In-person, Tech-157-XXX, First Name Last Name,
where XXX = YOUR Group such as 0AB, 0EA etc.
First Name = YOUR (Student’s) First Name Last Name = YOUR (Student’s) Last Name
6.
Submit .pdf of Lab Report to Professor in Blackboard Learn > Course Messages
If Steps 1 to 6 above were NOT COMPLETED by you, your Lab Report will NOT BE MARKED and a Grade = 0 % will be assigned to your Lab Report
Your Lab Report will NOT BE ACCEPTED and a Grade = 0% will be assigned to your Lab Report if you did not attend the In-person Lab Session and complete the Lab
DUE DATE FOR YOUR LAB REPORT IS A WEEK AFTER THE LAB WAS COMPLETED. Review
the Lab Report before submitting. Put a check mark ( ✓ ) in the appropriate CHECK BOX ( ) ON THE LEFT if the corresponding item has been completed in your Lab Report
To
be
completed
by
Student:
(
) Procedure Step 11
[
] / 20
(
) Procedure Step 12
[
] / 30
(
) Procedure Step 15
[
] / 20
(
) Procedure Step 16
[
] / 30
Per Tech-157 Academic Integrity, Rev Winter 2023, you are allowed to discuss the Lab and Lab Report with your peers, but if Academic Dishonesty is found, the student(s) will receive a mark of zero and will face
sanctions per Humber Regulations. By submitting this Lab Report, you agree to abide by this rule.
Tech-157 Lab 5 In-person, Rev Winter 2023
ANSWERS&QUESTIONS
Analyzing Results:
The experiment successfully calibrated the Paddle Wheel Flow Transmitter and generated a voltage-versus-flow curve. Here are the key points:
Calibration: The transmitter was adjusted to produce voltage outputs corresponding to different flow rates indicated by the rotameter.
Voltage-Versus-Flow Curve: The plotted data showed an increasing trend of voltage output with increasing flow rate, indicating the transmitter's response to flow changes.
Linearity: Further analysis is needed to determine if the relationship between voltage and flow rate is linear or nonlinear. Deviations from linearity may affect measurement accuracy.
Implications: Nonlinear behavior could introduce inaccuracies in flow rate measurements, highlighting the importance of understanding and compensating for such effects.
Further Investigations: Additional experiments under varying conditions and comparative analyses with other flow measurement devices could provide insights into the transmitter's performance characteristics and accuracy.
Overall, the results provide valuable information for optimizing flow measurement accuracy and reliability in industrial applications.
Unexpected Occurrences:
During the experiment, unexpected malfunctions or failures in the flow measurement equipment, such as the Paddle Wheel Flow Transmitter or rotameter, can occur. These issues may include sensor failures, electrical faults, mechanical breakdowns, or connectivity problems. When equipment malfunctions, it can lead to inaccurate
data collection or complete interruption of the experiment. Identifying and addressing equipment issues promptly is crucial to minimize the impact on data integrity and ensure the reliability of experimental results. This may involve troubleshooting the equipment, performing repairs or replacements as necessary, and conducting additional calibration checks to verify measurement accuracy. Additionally, regular maintenance and calibration of the equipment can help prevent or mitigate equipment failures during experiments.
Theoretical Correlation:
In this experiment, the theoretical correlation may involve predicting the relationship between the voltage output of the Paddle Wheel Flow Transmitter and the flow rate of the fluid. Based on theoretical principles of flow measurement and sensor behavior, one might expect a direct and proportional relationship between the voltage output and the flow rate. This theoretical correlation suggests that as the flow rate increases, the voltage output of the transmitter should also increase linearly. However, factors such as calibration drift, environmental conditions, and equipment limitations may influence the actual correlation observed in the experiment. Therefore, the theoretical correlation serves as a starting point for analysis and interpretation, guiding expectations and hypotheses regarding the behavior of the flow measurement system.
Reflective Learning:
Participants evaluated their performance in the experiment, focusing on understanding the procedure, problem-
solving abilities, data accuracy, collaboration, and overall learning outcomes. This reflective process enhances understanding, problem-solving skills, and collaboration for future experiments.
Challenges and Resolutions:
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Overcoming obstacles led to successful completion of the experiment and valuable learning experiences.
Conclusion:
In this experiment, we investigated the relationship between voltage output and flow rate using the Paddle Wheel Flow Transmitter. By calibrating the transmitter and recording voltage outputs at various flow rates, we generated a voltage-versus-flow rate curve. Our analysis revealed that the voltage output increased with increasing flow rates, indicating a positive correlation between the two variables. However, the relationship was not perfectly linear, likely due to factors such as calibration drift and sensor limitations. Reflective learning allowed us to recognize the importance of accounting for these factors in data interpretation. Overall, this experiment provided valuable insights into flow measurement principles and the behavior of flow sensing devices.