Emerging Trends in Behavioral Accounting Research Explained

docx

School

Fiji National University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

501

Subject

Accounting

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by shayalchand100

ACC706: Accounting Theory & Practice Semester 2 – 2023 Tutorial 8 1. Discuss the emergence and significance of Behavioral Accounting Research (BAR) in the field of accounting. Discuss the limitations of both capital market research and agency theory that led to the development of BAR. Emergence of Behavioral Accounting Research (BAR): Behavioral Accounting Research (BAR) has emerged as a critical area of study in accounting due to certain limitations in existing research approaches:  Capital Market Research Limitations:  Focus on Information Release and Market Reaction: Capital market research primarily concentrates on two aspects: the release of accounting information and the subsequent market reaction to this information.  Lack of Intermediary Understanding: It does not delve into what happens between these two events—the actual processes through which information is processed and interpreted by market participants.  Limitations of Agency Theory:  Maximization of Self-Interest Assumption: Agency theory, a response to the limitations of capital market research, assumes that individuals are motivated to maximize their self-interest.  Incomplete Explanation of Behavior: This assumption simplifies the development of testable predictions for research but doesn't fully explain why people act as they do. It suggests that different behaviors are driven by the same self-interest, which is an incomplete explanation.  Significance of Behavioral Accounting Research: The emergence of BAR is significant for several reasons:  Better Understanding of Accounting Information Use: BAR allows for a deeper understanding of how people use accounting information. It focuses on the actual behavior and decision-making processes of individuals when presented with accounting data.  Study of Diverse Reasons for Behavior: Unlike agency theory, which often attributes behavior to self-interest, BAR recognizes that people make different choices for various reasons. It enables researchers to explore the diverse motivations behind accounting decisions.

2. Discuss the main types of Behavioral Accounting Research (BAR and explain their aims and their application in the field of accounting. Types of Behavioral Accounting Research (BAR):  Human Judgement Theory (HJT): HJT is a branch of BAR that focuses on studying the judgment and decision-making processes of accountants and auditors. It aims to explain and predict the behavior of individuals involved in accounting and improve their decision- making abilities.  Human Information Processing (HIP): HIP, another facet of BAR, investigates how individuals process and interpret accounting information. It delves into the cognitive processes behind decision-making in accounting contexts and aims to enhance the quality of these decisions. Aims of Behavioral Accounting Research: The primary aims of BAR are as follows:  Explain and Predict Behavior: BAR seeks to understand and forecast the behavior of individuals in accounting roles, such as accountants, auditors, and financial analysts.  Improve Decision Making: It aims to enhance decision-making processes by providing insights into how accounting professionals and users of financial information make judgments and decisions.  Enhance the Quality of Decision Making: In the context of financial accounting, BAR endeavors to improve decision-making by both those who produce financial statements (including auditors) and those who use these reports for external purposes. 3. Imagine you are a researcher in a psychology lab, and you are conducting a study to understand how individuals make decisions in high-stress situations, such as emergency responders during crisis situations. a) Given the scenario, discuss the limitations of using predictive models like the Brunswick Lens Model to understand decision-making in high-stress situations. Limitations of Predictive Models:  Lack of Real-World Insight: Predictive models, such as the Brunswik Lens Model, are valuable for their predictive accuracy, as mentioned in the notes. However, they may have limitations in capturing the intricacies of decision-making in high- stress situations, as those faced by emergency responders.  Assumption of Simultaneous Processing: Predictive models often assume that decision-makers can simultaneously process all information items and arrive at a decision. In reality, individuals faced with high-stress scenarios tend to engage in a

more step-by-step, iterative process due to the complexity and urgency of the situation. b) Explain why researchers in your study might need models with descriptive power. The Need for Descriptive Models:  Understanding Decision Processes : Researchers studying decision-making in high-stress situations need models with descriptive power to gain a deeper understanding of how individuals actually make decisions. Descriptive models provide insights into the cognitive processes, decision strategies, and heuristics used by decision-makers.  Identifying Weaknesses : Descriptive models offer the ability to identify weaknesses in decision processes. These weaknesses can include biases, cognitive shortcuts, or suboptimal strategies that decision-makers may employ under stress. Identifying these weaknesses is crucial for improving decision- making.  Tailored Training and Improvement : Armed with insights from descriptive models, researchers can design training programs and interventions that target specific aspects of decision-making that need improvement. This targeted approach can lead to more effective training and better decision outcomes. 4. Discuss why the lack of a single underlying theory in Behavioral Accounting Research (BAR) poses limitations for policy development. How does this differ from research in fields like capital market research and agency theory? Challenges in Behavioral Accounting Research (BAR):  Complex Environment : Accounting operates in a complex environment with various stakeholders, each with different interests and demands. This complexity makes it challenging to predict how accounting practices will evolve in response to changing circumstances.  Conflicting Findings : BAR often produces conflicting findings, partly due to the diverse nature of the field. Studies from different disciplines and contexts may yield contradictory results, making it difficult to provide conclusive guidance for policy decisions.  Lack of Unified Theory : Unlike fields like capital market research and agency theory, BAR lacks a single underlying theory to unify research questions and findings. Researchers in BAR draw from a multitude of disciplines, making it challenging to develop overarching generalizations for policy makers. Comparison with Capital Market Research and Agency Theory:

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

In contrast to BAR, capital market research and agency theory are more grounded in a particular field of economics, which provides a more structured framework for research and theory development. They often have well-established models and theories that guide their work. This enables them to produce more consistent and coherent findings, which can be directly applied to policy development in specific economic contexts. 5. Considering the multifaceted nature of accounting, discuss the challenges that arise from the two- way influence between accounting practices and human behavior. Provide examples or scenarios that illustrate how accounting practices can be influenced by the complex environment in which accountants operate and the competing demands for accounting information. The Two-Way Influence in Accounting and Human Behavior: The relationship between accounting practices and human behavior is inherently two-way. Accounting practices are influenced by the actions and decisions of individuals or groups, referred to as accounting entities, and at the same time, accounting practices themselves can influence human behavior. Let's explore this dynamic further: Influence of Human Behavior on Accounting Practices:  Example 1 - Disclosure of Environmental Information: When organizations choose to disclose environmental information, such as the potential cost of environmental cleanup, this decision can be influenced by the behavior of various stakeholders. Environmental lobby groups may exert pressure, leading to greater transparency in reporting.  Example 2 - Shareholder Concerns: Conversely, the concerns of shareholder groups can also impact accounting practices. They may argue that excessive resources spent on addressing environmental issues could divert funds from more profit-oriented activities. These examples highlight how the behavior and demands of different groups can shape the accounting information reported by organizations. Influence of Accounting Practices on Human Behavior:  Example 1 - Investor Decisions: The accounting information presented in financial reports can significantly influence the decisions of investors. For instance, positive financial results may attract more investors, while negative results might lead to divestment.  Example 2 - Management Incentives: The design of accounting systems, including performance metrics and bonus structures, can influence the behavior of management. For example, if managers' bonuses are tied to short-term financial performance, they may prioritize actions that boost short-term results, potentially at the expense of long-term sustainability. Accounting practices can shape the behavior of individuals within organizations and in the broader financial market.

6. In the context of decision-making research, explain the concepts of predictive power and descriptive power as they relate to Process Tracing Methods and the Lens Model. Highlight the limitations of each approach individually. Then, describe how researchers have attempted to overcome these limitations by combining the two approaches through Classification and Regression Trees (CART). Provide insights into why CART can sometimes become relatively complex and discuss the implications of this complexity in terms of training and decision-making. Predictive Power and Descriptive Power:  Predictive Power: Predictive power in decision-making research refers to the ability of a model or method to accurately predict the outcomes or classifications of specific events or cases. It is focused on making accurate forecasts or predictions about future events based on historical data or decision processes. In the context of the Lens Model, it aims to predict the event of interest.  Descriptive Power: Descriptive power, on the other hand, pertains to the ability of a model or method to explain or describe how a decision is made. It aims to construct a detailed representation of the decision processes, often in the form of decision trees or diagrams. Descriptive power helps us understand the step-by-step thinking that leads to a decision. Limitations of Each Approach:  Process Tracing Methods: Process tracing methods, which involve verbal descriptions and decision tree diagrams, excel in providing descriptive power. They can effectively represent how decisions are made. However, they may lack predictive power. Decision makers may have difficulty explaining all the steps they go through, especially for routine tasks where decision processes become implicit and unconscious.  Lens Model: The Lens Model, while possessing strong predictive power, may lack descriptive power. It can accurately predict outcomes but may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the decision processes. Combining Predictive and Descriptive Powers through CART:  CART (Classification and Regression Trees): Researchers recognized the need for both predictive and descriptive powers in decision-making research. CART is a statistical technique that aims to combine these two powers. It partitions or splits the output of a decision maker's judgment into decision nodes to maximize predictive accuracy while also providing descriptive insights.

 Complexity of CART: However, CART can become relatively complex, especially when dealing with large datasets. The more data available for analysis, the more complex the resulting decision tree becomes. This complexity can make it challenging to derive simple and actionable rules for training other staff members or for practical decision-making.  Implications: The relative complexity of decision trees derived from CART can pose challenges in real-world applications. Training staff members based on complex decision trees may be time- consuming and require specialized expertise. THE END

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version