ACC 421 6-2 Short Paper- Interview & Witness for the Prosecution

docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

421

Subject

Accounting

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by Barbara8289

Report
1 6-2 Short Paper: Interview & Witness for the Prosecution Harriet Creyer 6-2 Short Paper: Interview & Witness for the Prosecution Southern New Hampshire University ACC 421 Auditing and Forensic Accounting
2 6-2 Short Paper: Interview & Witness for the Prosecution Atlanta Man Convicted by Jury for Multi-Million- Dollar Fraud Schemes Jean-Daniel Perkins, of Atlanta, Georgia has been found guilty on the charges of bank fraud, credit card fraud, and aggravated identity theft. Being described “This defendant was a predatory fraudster of the worst sort” ( Atlanta man convicted by jury for multi-million-dollar fraud schemes ). Within the investigation of Mr. Perkins multiple people were involved with collecting the evidence in which was used to prosecute the defendant. One of the important expert witnesses in this case is the undercover FBI agent assigned to this case. The unnamed FBI agent played a vital part in obtaining key evidence to help with the convictions. During his undercover operation and posing as an employee with access to financial data he was able to gain access to Perkins and gather “ who gave the agent a dozen counterfeit credit cards, and the two discussed a wide variety of criminal schemes involving financial data and credit cards. The FBI agent recorded approximately 30 telephone calls with PERKINS in which they discussed the schemes, and how the maximum amounts of money could be drawn from victim financial institutions and their customers.” ( Atlanta man convicted by jury for multi-million-dollar fraud schemes ). During the investigation there was extensive amount of data was uncovered which from a source in Ukraine, this consisted of encoded cards. Perkins also engaged in other fraud schemes which included obtaining internal SunTrust account information and then impersonating account holders. Merchant accounts held at American Express allowed him to accept American Express credit cards for “ nonexistent goods and services. ” ( Atlanta man convicted by jury for multi-million-dollar fraud schemes). On the day of his arrest “ law enforcement recovered dozens of counterfeit credit cards from PERKINS, as well as digital
3 6-2 Short Paper: Interview & Witness for the Prosecution media connecting PERKINS to the fraud scheme” Atlanta man convicted by jury for multi- million-dollar fraud schemes). Some of the expert witnesses that would have been called upon during the trial of Jean-Daniel Perkins would have been able to provide critical evidence and explanations regarding the information gathered. The expert witnesses would have been a vital step in the process of securing a guilty conviction. It is unclear if the identity of the undercover agent is known to anyone outside of law enforcement; however, they would have been brought in to testify to the information they received during the operation. The undercover agent would be the most important expert witness in this trail due to their exposure to Perkins. FBI Agent Lamkin who was in charge of the operation would be an extremely important expert witness to the trail, he was the key investigator into this case. Representatives from the fraud department would be called from both SunTrust and American Express to testify on the information obtained from their sides of the investigation. During the interview with Jean-Daniel Perkins, certain cues would be taken into consideration, such as: Body Language – Body positions, movements, and other movements from the body, they are good cues for the interviewers however they are not admissible or very reliable when it comes to court. Eye Language – A more reliable indicator of the truth is Eye Language, eyes are the most communicative part of the body, it is very difficult to manipulate the eye movements. Deception Cues – Similar to body language these are unreliable and not admissible in court, however they do help within the interviewing process. Statement Analysis – This is a word-by-word examination of the statement previously given by the defendant.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
4 6-2 Short Paper: Interview & Witness for the Prosecution SCAN – looks for the reflection of deception in the way statements are made. In order for SCAN to work, the analyst must have a truth statement from the suspect. While SCAN is as reliable as a polygraph examination, and good investigative tools they are not admissible or reliable in court.
5 6-2 Short Paper: Interview & Witness for the Prosecution References “Atlanta Man Convicted by Jury for Multi-Million-Dollar Fraud Schemes.”  FBI , FBI, 27 June 2011, https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/atlanta/press-releases/2011/atlanta-man- convicted-by-jury-for-multi-million-dollar-fraud-schemes Singleton, T.W.S.A. J. (2010). Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting (4th ed.). Wiley Professional Development (P&T). https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/books/9780470877913