
The seasonal energy efficiency ratio (SEER) is 13 for a new heating and air conditioning system that costs $4,400 to install. A higher SEER (14) system is available for $5,200. The more efficient system with a SEER of 14 will save 10,000,000 Btu per year in energy consumption. Assume the cost per million Btu is $10.00. If the warranty on either system is 10 years, is the extra $800 for the more efficient system justified? The inflation-free (real) interest rate is 2% per year. What assumptions did you make in your analysis?

Calculate the internal rate o return.
Explanation of Solution
The assumption is that the cost of energy is remain the same for the analysis period of 10 years. Also it is assumes that the salvage value of the two system at end of the life time is zero.
Time period is denoted by n and the interest is denoted by i. The internal rate of return (i) between the two systems can be calculated as follows.
Substitute the value of ‘i’ as 4.3% by trial and error method in the above calculation. This makes the calculated value is equal to additional spending. Thus, it is verified that the IRR is 4.3%. Since the IRR is greater than the real interest rate. The additional spending is justified.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 8 Solutions
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Horngren's Accounting (12th Edition)
Intermediate Accounting (2nd Edition)
Principles of Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management (10th Edition)
Marketing: An Introduction (13th Edition)
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
- A firm faces the following production function, Y = AKα L¹-a (1) Here Y is output, K is capital, L is fixed labour, and A is a measure of technology. The firm uses an optimal amount of capital determined by the condition, MPK = r +8 (2) Where MPK is the marginal productivity of capital, r is the real interest rate, and ♪ is the depreciation rate. (a) Using equations (1) and (2) find an expression for K*, the optimal amount of capital the firm should use. [3 marks] (b) Referring to your result from part (a), comment on what happens to K* when each of the following variables change (holding other variables constant), (i) The measure of technology (A) falls (ii) The depreciation rate (8) increases (iii) The real interest rate (r) increases [2 marks] [2 marks] [2 marks] [Hint: For each of parts (i)-(iii) you are being asked to comment on what happens to K* if just the variable mentioned in the question part changes. Your answer should state whether K* increases, decreases, or stays the…arrow_forwardIn the week-4 materials, when deriving labour supply, we assumed that the substitution effect dominated the income effect. What impact would there be on labour supply if this was not the case? Briefly investigate how such a change could theoretically affect the imposition of a minimum wage above the market clearing wage. (Your answer is likely to benefit from diagrammatic support.)arrow_forwardRefer to the attached Wk 3 Graph for this assignment. The graph shows an increase in demand (shifting of the demand curve from D1 to D2). Choose an application or situation in the economy or a specific economic situation to describe this graph. Take into consideration the impact on quantity and price in your analysis. Given your analysis, what would cause the situation to go the opposite way? What would cause the situation to go further into the same direction?arrow_forward
- Click on the link to study the Economics in the News. Then answer the following questions. 120- 118- 3. Use the AS-AD model to show the changes in aggregate demand and aggregate supply that occurred in 2016 and 2017 that brought the economy to its situation in mid-2017. The graph shows the U.S. economy in the second quarter of 2016. Draw and label the long-run aggregate supply curve in 2017. Draw and label the aggregate demand curve in 2017. Draw a point at the short-run macroeconomic equilibrium in the second quarter of 2017. 116- 114- ☑--- Price level (GDP deflator, 2009=100) LAS 16 112- 110- 108- 106- 104- 102- $16.7 100- 16.6 16.7 16.8 16.9 17.0 SAS 16 = SAS17 AD 16 17.1 17.2 17.3 Real GDP (trillions of 2009 dollars) >>> Draw only the objects specified in the question. LV ☑arrow_forwardPrice level (GDP deflator, 2009=100) Fed Raises Rates As Job Gains, Firming Inflation Stoke Confidence The U.S. Federal Reserve raised interest rates on Wednesday. The rate rise was the second in three months. This second rise comes in an economy that is growing faster and creating jobs at a more rapid pace. These gains are accompanied by a rising inflation rate. 140- 130- Source: Reuters, March 15, 2017 Describe the process by which the Fed's action reported in the news clip flows through the economy. 120- ... 110- LAS SAS → ☑ When the Fed raises the interest rate, A. aggregate demand decreases and short-run aggregate supply increases, and the price level falls B. aggregate demand increases and real GDP increases C. aggregate demand decreases and the price level falls D. short-run aggregate supply increases and the price level falls The graph shows the long-run aggregate supply curve and the short-run aggregate supply curve. Draw the AD curve to illustrate the state of the economy…arrow_forwardPrice level (GDP deflator, 2009=100) Millennials Are Starting to Spend More Millennials, who spend an average of $85 a day, are expected to spend at a higher rate in the next fifteen years. Only 37 percent of Americans report higher spending today than a year ago, while 42 percent of millennials say they are spending more. Millennials are spending more on rent or mortgages and leisure activities than they were spending a year ago. 140- 130- Source: Business Journal, May 25, 2016 120- Describe the macroeconomic equilibrium after the change in spending by millennials. If the economy had been at a below full-employment equilibrium, then the economy will A. move to an above full-employment equilibrium with real GDP less than potential GDP B. move to a full-employment equilibrium as short-run aggregate supply increases at the same time 'C. move to a full-employment equilibrium and equilibrium real GDP equals potential GDP D. remain stuck in a below full-employment equilibrium If the economy…arrow_forward
- Wolfgang is a typical producer in a perfectly competitive piano industry (i.e., all other producers of pianos face the same costs as Wolfgang). The following production and cost data apply to the long run as well as the short run. Fixed costs (rent) are unrecoverable in the short run and are equal to $2400 per month. Variable costs consist of raw materials (wire, wood, plastic), which cost $1000 per piano, and the $40 per hour opportunity cost of Wolfgang's time. Wolfgang's production function is given in the table at right. Wolfgang will shut down if the price per piano is less than OA. $3000. B. $4000. O C. $5000. ○ D. None of the above. Pianos (Q) Hours (L) Raw Materials ( 0 0 0 1 100 1000 2 150 2000 3 240 3000 4 400 4000arrow_forwardP2 P₁ $ per unit Using the graph below, determine which statement is TRUE. MC1 SRATC₁ Q1 Q₂ MC2 SRATC2 LRAC ✓ LEA Quantityarrow_forwardUsing the grapns below, wnicn snow the snort-run cost curves for 3 perfectly competitive firms in the same industry, determine whether the industry is in long-run equilibrium or not. Q Q Firm A QA MC ATC Output Firm B QB MC ATC Firm C MC ATC Output Output Qc If Firms A, B and C are in the same industry, is this industry in long-run equilibrium? ○ A. Yes, because P = MC = MR for each of the 3 firms. ○ B. No, because Firm A is not producing at a profit-maximizing level of output. ○ C. Yes, because all 3 firms are producing at their minimum average total cost. OD. The answer is uncertain since it's unknown whether the firms are producing at the minimum efficient scale or not. ○ E. No, because if the industry were in equilibrium, all 3 firms would be earning zero economic profits.arrow_forward
- Consider the table on the right, which shows the various revenue concepts for a perfectly competitive firm. Suppose the firm faces a constant market price of $4. Compute first total revenue for each level of output and fill in the TR column of the table. Next, compute marginal revenue for each level of output and fill in the MR column of the table. (Marginal revenue at each level of output is computed using total revenue for two successive levels of output. For example, marginal revenue at 160 uses total revenue for output levels 120 and 160.) Total Marginal Price (p)Quantity (Q) Revenue (TR)Revenue (MR) $4 A EA 120 $4 160 $4 200 $4 240 $4 280 $ EA EA EA 10 S คarrow_forwardThis week we will be discussing measures of economic well-being. Read the following short article from the Office of National Statistics from the U.K. which discusses different measures of economic well-being: https://blog.ons.gov.uk/2017/07/06/beyond-gdp-measuring-the-economic-well-being-of-individuals/ For this assignment, we will narrow down to the economic well-being of the St. Louis region (or another region you choose). As the article indicates there are different measures of well-being. You are interested in creating a Hypothesis Test about the economic well-being of the area. Discuss the following issues: First, think about your research hypothesis and justify it briefly. Remember, a hypothesis is a well-thought and untested proposition. What is the null hypothesis? What is the parameter you are interested in? (i.e., the measure of well-being). Is it going to be a Lower-Tail, Upper-Tail or Two-Tailed test? What is the data that you need and how will you collect the data? What…arrow_forwardJohnny brought $39.50 to the art supply store. He bought a brush, a sketchbook, and a paint set. The brush was 1 6 as much as the sketchbook, and the sketchbook cost 3 4 the cost of the paint set. Johnny had $2.00 left over after buying these items.arrow_forward
- Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student EditionEconomicsISBN:9780078747663Author:McGraw-HillPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co





