Credit card spending An analysis of spending by a sample of credit card bank cardholders shows that spending by cardholders in January ( Jan ) is related to their spending in December ( Dec ): The assumptions and conditions of the linear regression seemed to be satisfied and an analyst was about to predict January spending using the model J a n ^ = $ 612.07 + 0.403 D e c . Another analyst worried that different types of cardholders might behave differently. She examined the spending patterns of the cardholders and placed them into five market Segments . When she plotted the data using different colors and symbols for the five different segments, she found the following: Look at this plot carefully and discuss why she might be worried about the predictions from the model J a n ^ = $ 612.07 + 0.403 D e c .

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Textbook Question

Chapter 8, Problem 1E

Credit card spending An analysis of spending by a sample of credit card bank cardholders shows that spending by cardholders in January (Jan) is related to their spending in December (Dec):

Chapter 8, Problem 1E, Credit card spending An analysis of spending by a sample of credit card bank cardholders shows that , example 1

The assumptions and conditions of the linear regression seemed to be satisfied and an analyst was about to predict January spending using the model

J a n ^ = $ 612.07 + 0.403 D e c .

Another analyst worried that different types of cardholders might behave differently. She examined the spending patterns of the cardholders and placed them into five market Segments. When she plotted the data using different colors and symbols for the five different segments, she found the following:

Chapter 8, Problem 1E, Credit card spending An analysis of spending by a sample of credit card bank cardholders shows that , example 2

Look at this plot carefully and discuss why she might be worried about the predictions from the model

J a n ^ = $ 612.07 + 0.403 D e c .

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Being worried to make a prediction from the model Jan=$612.07+0.403 Dec., using a second scatterplot.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

A scatterplot of spending for a sample of credit card bank cardholders in January and in December is given. The corresponding regression model to predict January spending from December spending is Jan=$612.07+0.403 Dec.

Another scatterplot of spending for a sample of credit card bank cardholders in January and that in December for five market segments is given.

Justification:

The conditions for a scatterplot that is well-fitted for the data is as follows:

Straight enough condition: The relationship between y and x is straight enough to proceed with a linear regression model.
Outlier condition: No outlier must be there which influences the fit of the least square line.
Thickness condition: The spread of the data around the generally straight relationship seems to be consistent for all values of x.

The different segments are not scattered at random throughout the scatterplot.

Thus, the spread of the data is not consistent for all values of December and each segment may have a different relationship that might affect the accuracy of the model to predict.

The relationship between the spending of credit card bank cardholders in January and in December is not straight enough to proceed with a linear regression model.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Calculate the 90% confidence interval for the population mean difference using the data in the attached image. I need to see where I went wrong.

Microsoft Excel snapshot for random sampling: Also note the formula used for the last column 02 x✓ fx =INDEX(5852:58551, RANK(C2, $C$2:$C$51)) A B 1 No. States 2 1 ALABAMA Rand No. 0.925957526 3 2 ALASKA 0.372999976 4 3 ARIZONA 0.941323044 5 4 ARKANSAS 0.071266381 Random Sample CALIFORNIA NORTH CAROLINA ARKANSAS WASHINGTON G7 Microsoft Excel snapshot for systematic sampling: xfx INDEX(SD52:50551, F7) A B E F G 1 No. States Rand No. Random Sample population 50 2 1 ALABAMA 0.5296685 NEW HAMPSHIRE sample 10 3 2 ALASKA 0.4493186 OKLAHOMA k 5 4 3 ARIZONA 0.707914 KANSAS 5 4 ARKANSAS 0.4831379 NORTH DAKOTA 6 5 CALIFORNIA 0.7277162 INDIANA Random Sample Sample Name 7 6 COLORADO 0.5865002 MISSISSIPPI 8 7:ONNECTICU 0.7640596 ILLINOIS 9 8 DELAWARE 0.5783029 MISSOURI 525 10 15 INDIANA MARYLAND COLORADO

Suppose the Internal Revenue Service reported that the mean tax refund for the year 2022 was $3401. Assume the standard deviation is $82.5 and that the amounts refunded follow a normal probability distribution. Solve the following three parts? (For the answer to question 14, 15, and 16, start with making a bell curve. Identify on the bell curve where is mean, X, and area(s) to be determined. 1.What percent of the refunds are more than $3,500? 2. What percent of the refunds are more than $3500 but less than $3579? 3. What percent of the refunds are more than $3325 but less than $3579?

Answer 2

Textbook Question

Chapter 8, Problem 1E

Credit card spending An analysis of spending by a sample of credit card bank cardholders shows that spending by cardholders in January (Jan) is related to their spending in December (Dec):

Chapter 8, Problem 1E, Credit card spending An analysis of spending by a sample of credit card bank cardholders shows that , example 1

The assumptions and conditions of the linear regression seemed to be satisfied and an analyst was about to predict January spending using the model

J a n ^ = $ 612.07 + 0.403 D e c .

Another analyst worried that different types of cardholders might behave differently. She examined the spending patterns of the cardholders and placed them into five market Segments. When she plotted the data using different colors and symbols for the five different segments, she found the following:

Chapter 8, Problem 1E, Credit card spending An analysis of spending by a sample of credit card bank cardholders shows that , example 2

Look at this plot carefully and discuss why she might be worried about the predictions from the model

J a n ^ = $ 612.07 + 0.403 D e c .

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Being worried to make a prediction from the model Jan=$612.07+0.403 Dec., using a second scatterplot.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

A scatterplot of spending for a sample of credit card bank cardholders in January and in December is given. The corresponding regression model to predict January spending from December spending is Jan=$612.07+0.403 Dec.

Another scatterplot of spending for a sample of credit card bank cardholders in January and that in December for five market segments is given.

Justification:

The conditions for a scatterplot that is well-fitted for the data is as follows:

Straight enough condition: The relationship between y and x is straight enough to proceed with a linear regression model.
Outlier condition: No outlier must be there which influences the fit of the least square line.
Thickness condition: The spread of the data around the generally straight relationship seems to be consistent for all values of x.

The different segments are not scattered at random throughout the scatterplot.

Thus, the spread of the data is not consistent for all values of December and each segment may have a different relationship that might affect the accuracy of the model to predict.

The relationship between the spending of credit card bank cardholders in January and in December is not straight enough to proceed with a linear regression model.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Textbook Question

Chapter 8, Problem 1E

Credit card spending An analysis of spending by a sample of credit card bank cardholders shows that spending by cardholders in January (Jan) is related to their spending in December (Dec):

Chapter 8, Problem 1E, Credit card spending An analysis of spending by a sample of credit card bank cardholders shows that , example 1

The assumptions and conditions of the linear regression seemed to be satisfied and an analyst was about to predict January spending using the model

J a n ^ = $ 612.07 + 0.403 D e c .

Another analyst worried that different types of cardholders might behave differently. She examined the spending patterns of the cardholders and placed them into five market Segments. When she plotted the data using different colors and symbols for the five different segments, she found the following:

Chapter 8, Problem 1E, Credit card spending An analysis of spending by a sample of credit card bank cardholders shows that , example 2

Look at this plot carefully and discuss why she might be worried about the predictions from the model

J a n ^ = $ 612.07 + 0.403 D e c .

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Being worried to make a prediction from the model Jan=$612.07+0.403 Dec., using a second scatterplot.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

A scatterplot of spending for a sample of credit card bank cardholders in January and in December is given. The corresponding regression model to predict January spending from December spending is Jan=$612.07+0.403 Dec.

Another scatterplot of spending for a sample of credit card bank cardholders in January and that in December for five market segments is given.

Justification:

The conditions for a scatterplot that is well-fitted for the data is as follows:

Straight enough condition: The relationship between y and x is straight enough to proceed with a linear regression model.
Outlier condition: No outlier must be there which influences the fit of the least square line.
Thickness condition: The spread of the data around the generally straight relationship seems to be consistent for all values of x.

The different segments are not scattered at random throughout the scatterplot.

Thus, the spread of the data is not consistent for all values of December and each segment may have a different relationship that might affect the accuracy of the model to predict.

The relationship between the spending of credit card bank cardholders in January and in December is not straight enough to proceed with a linear regression model.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Textbook Question

Chapter 8, Problem 1E

Credit card spending An analysis of spending by a sample of credit card bank cardholders shows that spending by cardholders in January (Jan) is related to their spending in December (Dec):

Chapter 8, Problem 1E, Credit card spending An analysis of spending by a sample of credit card bank cardholders shows that , example 1

The assumptions and conditions of the linear regression seemed to be satisfied and an analyst was about to predict January spending using the model

J a n ^ = $ 612.07 + 0.403 D e c .

Another analyst worried that different types of cardholders might behave differently. She examined the spending patterns of the cardholders and placed them into five market Segments. When she plotted the data using different colors and symbols for the five different segments, she found the following:

Chapter 8, Problem 1E, Credit card spending An analysis of spending by a sample of credit card bank cardholders shows that , example 2

Look at this plot carefully and discuss why she might be worried about the predictions from the model

J a n ^ = $ 612.07 + 0.403 D e c .

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Being worried to make a prediction from the model Jan=$612.07+0.403 Dec., using a second scatterplot.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

A scatterplot of spending for a sample of credit card bank cardholders in January and in December is given. The corresponding regression model to predict January spending from December spending is Jan=$612.07+0.403 Dec.

Another scatterplot of spending for a sample of credit card bank cardholders in January and that in December for five market segments is given.

Justification:

The conditions for a scatterplot that is well-fitted for the data is as follows:

Straight enough condition: The relationship between y and x is straight enough to proceed with a linear regression model.
Outlier condition: No outlier must be there which influences the fit of the least square line.
Thickness condition: The spread of the data around the generally straight relationship seems to be consistent for all values of x.

The different segments are not scattered at random throughout the scatterplot.

Thus, the spread of the data is not consistent for all values of December and each segment may have a different relationship that might affect the accuracy of the model to predict.

The relationship between the spending of credit card bank cardholders in January and in December is not straight enough to proceed with a linear regression model.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Textbook Question

Answer 6

Textbook Question

Answer 7

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Being worried to make a prediction from the model Jan=$612.07+0.403 Dec., using a second scatterplot.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

A scatterplot of spending for a sample of credit card bank cardholders in January and in December is given. The corresponding regression model to predict January spending from December spending is Jan=$612.07+0.403 Dec.

Another scatterplot of spending for a sample of credit card bank cardholders in January and that in December for five market segments is given.

Justification:

The conditions for a scatterplot that is well-fitted for the data is as follows:

Straight enough condition: The relationship between y and x is straight enough to proceed with a linear regression model.
Outlier condition: No outlier must be there which influences the fit of the least square line.
Thickness condition: The spread of the data around the generally straight relationship seems to be consistent for all values of x.

The different segments are not scattered at random throughout the scatterplot.

Thus, the spread of the data is not consistent for all values of December and each segment may have a different relationship that might affect the accuracy of the model to predict.

The relationship between the spending of credit card bank cardholders in January and in December is not straight enough to proceed with a linear regression model.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Being worried to make a prediction from the model Jan=$612.07+0.403 Dec., using a second scatterplot.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

A scatterplot of spending for a sample of credit card bank cardholders in January and in December is given. The corresponding regression model to predict January spending from December spending is Jan=$612.07+0.403 Dec.

Another scatterplot of spending for a sample of credit card bank cardholders in January and that in December for five market segments is given.

Justification:

The conditions for a scatterplot that is well-fitted for the data is as follows:

Straight enough condition: The relationship between y and x is straight enough to proceed with a linear regression model.
Outlier condition: No outlier must be there which influences the fit of the least square line.
Thickness condition: The spread of the data around the generally straight relationship seems to be consistent for all values of x.

The different segments are not scattered at random throughout the scatterplot.

Thus, the spread of the data is not consistent for all values of December and each segment may have a different relationship that might affect the accuracy of the model to predict.

The relationship between the spending of credit card bank cardholders in January and in December is not straight enough to proceed with a linear regression model.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

To determine

Being worried to make a prediction from the model Jan=$612.07+0.403 Dec., using a second scatterplot.

Answer 12

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

A scatterplot of spending for a sample of credit card bank cardholders in January and in December is given. The corresponding regression model to predict January spending from December spending is Jan=$612.07+0.403 Dec.

Another scatterplot of spending for a sample of credit card bank cardholders in January and that in December for five market segments is given.

Justification:

The conditions for a scatterplot that is well-fitted for the data is as follows:

Straight enough condition: The relationship between y and x is straight enough to proceed with a linear regression model.
Outlier condition: No outlier must be there which influences the fit of the least square line.
Thickness condition: The spread of the data around the generally straight relationship seems to be consistent for all values of x.

The different segments are not scattered at random throughout the scatterplot.

Thus, the spread of the data is not consistent for all values of December and each segment may have a different relationship that might affect the accuracy of the model to predict.

The relationship between the spending of credit card bank cardholders in January and in December is not straight enough to proceed with a linear regression model.

Answer 13

Ch. 8.3 - Each of these scatterplots shows an unusual point....Ch. 8.3 - Prob. 2JC Ch. 8.3 - Prob. 3JC Ch. 8.7 - Prob. 4JC Ch. 8.7 - Prob. 5JC Ch. 8.7 - Prob. 6JC Ch. 8 - Credit card spending An analysis of spending by a...Ch. 8 - Prob. 2E Ch. 8 - Prob. 3E Ch. 8 - Prob. 4E

Concept explainers

Videos

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 8 Solutions