Economics For Today
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337613040
Author: Tucker
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 21, Problem 5SQP
To determine
Size of change in government spending to restore the full employment equilibrium.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose you are an economic adviser to the president, and the economy needs a real GDP increase of $700 billion to reach full-
employment equilibrium.
If the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.6 and you are a Keynesian, Congress must increase government spending by $
billion to restore the economy to full employment.
According to Keynesian economics, what impact would a balanced budget amendment to the constitution requiring the federal government to balance its budget annually have on the economy?
Consider an economy that is operating below the full-employment level of real GDP. What would be the effect of an increase in government spending on aggregate demand and real GDP?
Chapter 21 Solutions
Economics For Today
Ch. 21.3 - Prob. 1YTECh. 21 - Prob. 1SQPCh. 21 - Prob. 2SQPCh. 21 - Prob. 3SQPCh. 21 - Prob. 4SQPCh. 21 - Prob. 5SQPCh. 21 - Prob. 6SQPCh. 21 - Prob. 7SQPCh. 21 - Prob. 8SQPCh. 21 - Prob. 9SQP
Ch. 21 - Prob. 10SQPCh. 21 - Prob. 11SQPCh. 21 - Prob. 1SQCh. 21 - Prob. 2SQCh. 21 - Prob. 3SQCh. 21 - Prob. 4SQCh. 21 - Prob. 5SQCh. 21 - Prob. 6SQCh. 21 - Mathematically, the value of the tax multiplier in...Ch. 21 - Prob. 8SQCh. 21 - Prob. 9SQCh. 21 - Prob. 10SQCh. 21 - Prob. 11SQCh. 21 - Prob. 12SQCh. 21 - Prob. 13SQCh. 21 - Prob. 14SQCh. 21 - Prob. 15SQCh. 21 - Prob. 16SQCh. 21 - Prob. 17SQCh. 21 - Prob. 18SQCh. 21 - Prob. 19SQCh. 21 - Prob. 20SQ
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose actual real GDP is $13.37 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.33 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.62. If we ignore price effects, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its spending to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)arrow_forwardKeynesian economics predicts that if government policy makers deem current equilibrium real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to be "too low," then an appropriate policy action would be to do nothing, because the economy is self-adjusting. raise government spending, thereby increasing aggregate demand and pushing up real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) with little or no inflationary consequences. increase taxes, thereby causing aggregate demand to increase and inducing a rise in real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) with little or no inflationary consequences. reduce the money stock, thereby causing aggregate demand to decrease and inducing a rise in fall in the price level that generates an increase in total planned expenditures.arrow_forwardSuppose actual real GDP is $7.87 trillion, potential real GDP is $14.36 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.61. If we ignore price effects, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)arrow_forward
- An economy is operating with output that is $40 billion below its natural level, and fiscal policymakers want to close this recessionary gap. The central bank agrees to adjust the money supply to hold the interest rate constant, so there is no crowding out. The marginal propensity to consume is 4/5, and the price level is completely fixed in the short run. In what direction and by how much would government spending need to change to close the recessionary gap? Explain your thinking Please give me answer in daetail pleasearrow_forwardLet's say that our country's Gross Domestic Product is at $15 billion (this year). We also know that we currently have unemployment and that we would have full employment if our Gross Domestic Product were to reach $18.5 billion. If the Keynesian multiplier is 7, then what would Keynesian economists recommend regarding changes in government spending and taxation?arrow_forwardConsider a hypothetical closed economy in which households spend $0.80 of each additional dollar they earn and save the remaining $0.20. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) for this economy is Suppose the government in this economy decides to increase government purchases by $400 billion. The increase in government purchases will lead to an increase in income, generating an initial change in consumption equal to This increases income yet again, causing a second change in consumption equal to The total change in demand resulting from the initial change in government spending is and the spending multiplier for this economy is . The following graph shows the aggregate demand curve (AD₁ ) for this economy before the change in government spending. Use the green line (triangle symbol) to plot the new aggregate demand curve (AD2) after the spending multiplier effect takes place. Hint: Be sure that the new aggregate demand curve (AD2) is parallel to the initial aggregate demand curve (AD1…arrow_forward
- The Japanese government decides to stimulate the economy by increasing direct spending by $70 billion. If the final change in real GDP is $280 billion, what is Japanese consumers' marginal propensity to consume (MPC)? Please round your answer to two decimal places.arrow_forwardConsider two standard Keynesian models. In Model 1, there are two types of consumers, Type A, who have low marginal propensities to consume, and Type B, who have high marginal propensities to consume. In Model 2, there are only Type B consumers. Then, an increase in the exogenous government purchases would lead to higher output in Model 1 than in Model 2. Answer true or false. Please briefly explain your answer.arrow_forwardConsider a hypothetical closed economy in which households spend $0.60 of each additional dollar they earn and save the remaining $0.40. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) for this economy is Suppose the government in this economy decides to increase government purchases by $400 billion. The increase in government purchases will lead to an increase in income, generating an initial change in consumption equal to . This increases income yet again, causing a second change in consumption equal to The total change in demand resulting from the initial change in government spending is The following graph shows the aggregate demand curve (AD₁ ) for this economy before the change in government spending. Use the green line (triangle symbol) to plot the new aggregate demand curve (AD2) after the spending multiplier effect takes place. Hint: Be sure that the new aggregate demand curve (AD2) is parallel to the initial aggregate demand curve (AD₁). You can see the slope of AD₁ by selecting it…arrow_forward
- When the Federal government takes action to change taxes and spending to stimulate the economy such policy is: A) Discretionary B) Passive C) Automatic D) Nondiscretionaryarrow_forwardIf the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.90, a $100 increase in taxes imposed by the government, other things being equal, will cause a decrease in GDP by 100 900 $1,000arrow_forwardAccording to the standard textbook Keynesian analysis, which is greater: the tax multiplier or the government spending multiplier? Explain the reasoning behind this relationship.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning