Some believe that archaea should not be separate from bacteria because both groups are prokaryotic. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your reasoning.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Textbook Question

Chapter 20, Problem 1CHI

Some believe that archaea should not be separate from bacteria because both groups are prokaryotic. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your reasoning.

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

Archaea and bacteria are referred to as prokaryotic unicellular organisms. Initially, archaea were classified as bacteria, thereby receiving the name archaebacteria. Since 1960s, genetic, biochemical, and genomic analyses are combined with developed methods for archaeal and bacterial cell imaging. As a result, it was concluded that Archaea and Bacteria are belongs to different taxa.

Explanation of Solution

Archaea and bacteria are referred to as prokaryotic organisms. Based on morphological features, they seem to be the same taxonomic group. However, based on genomic analysis, it was revealed that both organisms belong to different domains. In 1977, the American biophysicist and microbiologist revealed the third domain of life, which is known as archaea. This is achieved by the analysis of phylogenetic taxonomy of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA).

The other features that reveals that they are belonged to different domain are as follows:

The plasma membrane of archaea is made up of strikingly different lipids compared to those present in the plasma membrane of bacteria. The bacterial plasma membrane is comprised of ester-linked phospholipids like hapanoids and sterols, whereas the archaeal plasma membrane is comprised of diether glycerol or tetraether glycerol. Secondly, the cell wall of archaea is diverse compared to bacterial cell wall. This is because; the cell wall of archaea lacks peptidoglycan whereas the bacterial cell wall is made up of peptidoglycan.

Therefore, the above explained differences made this statement to disagree. Hence, archaea should be separated from the bacteria.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

1. In vivo testing provides valuable insight into a drug’s kinetics. Assessing drug kinetics following multiple different routes of administration provides greater insight than just a single route of administration alone. The following data was collected in 250 g rats following bolus iv, oral (po), and intraperitoneal (ip) administration.Using this data and set of graphs, determine: (a) k, C0, V, and AUC* for the bolus iv data (b) k, ka, B1, and AUC* for the po data (c) k, ka, B1, and AUC* for the ip data (d) relative bioavailability for po vs ip, Fpo/Fip (e) absolute po bioavailability, (f)Fpo absolute ip bioavailability, Fip MAKE SURE ANSWERS HAVE UNITS if appropriate. SHOW ALL WORK, including equation used, variables used and each step to your solution.

2. Drug quantification from plasma is commonly performed by using techniques such as HPLC or LC/MS. However, these methods do have limitations, and investigators may choose to use a radiolabeled analog of a drug instead. Radioligands are molecules that contain radioactive isotopes, commonly 3H or 14C. This technique allows investigators to quantify drug concentration from radiation measurements. The following measurements were made in 250 g rats following oral administration of 18.2 µCi of a 14C-labeled drug of interest: Time (min) Plasma Radiation Levels (µCi/L) 0 0.0 2 9.7 4 19.2 7 25.3 9 37.8 12 39.6 14 45.8 17 48.8 20 52.0 25 56.4 30 59.2 35 60.1 40 61.1 45 62.1 50 62.8 60 63.1 70 62.1 80 60.1 90 57.3 100 55.5 110 53.7 120 52.2 150 48.0 180 45.0 240 39.0 Note that a µCi is a measure of the amount of radioactivity and hence is a measure of the amount of drug present. Given that the oral bioavailability of this drug is known to be essentially 100%, estimate the following from this…

The current nutrition labelling regulation in Hong Kong requires food manufacturer to list E+7 information on the package of pre-packaged food products. Do you think that more nutrients, such as calcium and cholesterol, shall be included?

Answer 2

Textbook Question

Chapter 20, Problem 1CHI

Some believe that archaea should not be separate from bacteria because both groups are prokaryotic. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your reasoning.

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

Archaea and bacteria are referred to as prokaryotic unicellular organisms. Initially, archaea were classified as bacteria, thereby receiving the name archaebacteria. Since 1960s, genetic, biochemical, and genomic analyses are combined with developed methods for archaeal and bacterial cell imaging. As a result, it was concluded that Archaea and Bacteria are belongs to different taxa.

Explanation of Solution

Archaea and bacteria are referred to as prokaryotic organisms. Based on morphological features, they seem to be the same taxonomic group. However, based on genomic analysis, it was revealed that both organisms belong to different domains. In 1977, the American biophysicist and microbiologist revealed the third domain of life, which is known as archaea. This is achieved by the analysis of phylogenetic taxonomy of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA).

The other features that reveals that they are belonged to different domain are as follows:

The plasma membrane of archaea is made up of strikingly different lipids compared to those present in the plasma membrane of bacteria. The bacterial plasma membrane is comprised of ester-linked phospholipids like hapanoids and sterols, whereas the archaeal plasma membrane is comprised of diether glycerol or tetraether glycerol. Secondly, the cell wall of archaea is diverse compared to bacterial cell wall. This is because; the cell wall of archaea lacks peptidoglycan whereas the bacterial cell wall is made up of peptidoglycan.

Therefore, the above explained differences made this statement to disagree. Hence, archaea should be separated from the bacteria.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Textbook Question

Chapter 20, Problem 1CHI

Some believe that archaea should not be separate from bacteria because both groups are prokaryotic. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your reasoning.

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

Archaea and bacteria are referred to as prokaryotic unicellular organisms. Initially, archaea were classified as bacteria, thereby receiving the name archaebacteria. Since 1960s, genetic, biochemical, and genomic analyses are combined with developed methods for archaeal and bacterial cell imaging. As a result, it was concluded that Archaea and Bacteria are belongs to different taxa.

Explanation of Solution

Archaea and bacteria are referred to as prokaryotic organisms. Based on morphological features, they seem to be the same taxonomic group. However, based on genomic analysis, it was revealed that both organisms belong to different domains. In 1977, the American biophysicist and microbiologist revealed the third domain of life, which is known as archaea. This is achieved by the analysis of phylogenetic taxonomy of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA).

The other features that reveals that they are belonged to different domain are as follows:

The plasma membrane of archaea is made up of strikingly different lipids compared to those present in the plasma membrane of bacteria. The bacterial plasma membrane is comprised of ester-linked phospholipids like hapanoids and sterols, whereas the archaeal plasma membrane is comprised of diether glycerol or tetraether glycerol. Secondly, the cell wall of archaea is diverse compared to bacterial cell wall. This is because; the cell wall of archaea lacks peptidoglycan whereas the bacterial cell wall is made up of peptidoglycan.

Therefore, the above explained differences made this statement to disagree. Hence, archaea should be separated from the bacteria.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Textbook Question

Chapter 20, Problem 1CHI

Some believe that archaea should not be separate from bacteria because both groups are prokaryotic. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your reasoning.

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

Archaea and bacteria are referred to as prokaryotic unicellular organisms. Initially, archaea were classified as bacteria, thereby receiving the name archaebacteria. Since 1960s, genetic, biochemical, and genomic analyses are combined with developed methods for archaeal and bacterial cell imaging. As a result, it was concluded that Archaea and Bacteria are belongs to different taxa.

Explanation of Solution

Archaea and bacteria are referred to as prokaryotic organisms. Based on morphological features, they seem to be the same taxonomic group. However, based on genomic analysis, it was revealed that both organisms belong to different domains. In 1977, the American biophysicist and microbiologist revealed the third domain of life, which is known as archaea. This is achieved by the analysis of phylogenetic taxonomy of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA).

The other features that reveals that they are belonged to different domain are as follows:

The plasma membrane of archaea is made up of strikingly different lipids compared to those present in the plasma membrane of bacteria. The bacterial plasma membrane is comprised of ester-linked phospholipids like hapanoids and sterols, whereas the archaeal plasma membrane is comprised of diether glycerol or tetraether glycerol. Secondly, the cell wall of archaea is diverse compared to bacterial cell wall. This is because; the cell wall of archaea lacks peptidoglycan whereas the bacterial cell wall is made up of peptidoglycan.

Therefore, the above explained differences made this statement to disagree. Hence, archaea should be separated from the bacteria.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Textbook Question

Answer 6

Textbook Question

Answer 7

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

Archaea and bacteria are referred to as prokaryotic unicellular organisms. Initially, archaea were classified as bacteria, thereby receiving the name archaebacteria. Since 1960s, genetic, biochemical, and genomic analyses are combined with developed methods for archaeal and bacterial cell imaging. As a result, it was concluded that Archaea and Bacteria are belongs to different taxa.

Explanation of Solution

Archaea and bacteria are referred to as prokaryotic organisms. Based on morphological features, they seem to be the same taxonomic group. However, based on genomic analysis, it was revealed that both organisms belong to different domains. In 1977, the American biophysicist and microbiologist revealed the third domain of life, which is known as archaea. This is achieved by the analysis of phylogenetic taxonomy of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA).

The other features that reveals that they are belonged to different domain are as follows:

The plasma membrane of archaea is made up of strikingly different lipids compared to those present in the plasma membrane of bacteria. The bacterial plasma membrane is comprised of ester-linked phospholipids like hapanoids and sterols, whereas the archaeal plasma membrane is comprised of diether glycerol or tetraether glycerol. Secondly, the cell wall of archaea is diverse compared to bacterial cell wall. This is because; the cell wall of archaea lacks peptidoglycan whereas the bacterial cell wall is made up of peptidoglycan.

Therefore, the above explained differences made this statement to disagree. Hence, archaea should be separated from the bacteria.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Summary Introduction

Archaea and bacteria are referred to as prokaryotic unicellular organisms. Initially, archaea were classified as bacteria, thereby receiving the name archaebacteria. Since 1960s, genetic, biochemical, and genomic analyses are combined with developed methods for archaeal and bacterial cell imaging. As a result, it was concluded that Archaea and Bacteria are belongs to different taxa.

Explanation of Solution

Archaea and bacteria are referred to as prokaryotic organisms. Based on morphological features, they seem to be the same taxonomic group. However, based on genomic analysis, it was revealed that both organisms belong to different domains. In 1977, the American biophysicist and microbiologist revealed the third domain of life, which is known as archaea. This is achieved by the analysis of phylogenetic taxonomy of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA).

The other features that reveals that they are belonged to different domain are as follows:

The plasma membrane of archaea is made up of strikingly different lipids compared to those present in the plasma membrane of bacteria. The bacterial plasma membrane is comprised of ester-linked phospholipids like hapanoids and sterols, whereas the archaeal plasma membrane is comprised of diether glycerol or tetraether glycerol. Secondly, the cell wall of archaea is diverse compared to bacterial cell wall. This is because; the cell wall of archaea lacks peptidoglycan whereas the bacterial cell wall is made up of peptidoglycan.

Therefore, the above explained differences made this statement to disagree. Hence, archaea should be separated from the bacteria.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Summary Introduction

Archaea and bacteria are referred to as prokaryotic unicellular organisms. Initially, archaea were classified as bacteria, thereby receiving the name archaebacteria. Since 1960s, genetic, biochemical, and genomic analyses are combined with developed methods for archaeal and bacterial cell imaging. As a result, it was concluded that Archaea and Bacteria are belongs to different taxa.

Answer 12

Explanation of Solution

Archaea and bacteria are referred to as prokaryotic organisms. Based on morphological features, they seem to be the same taxonomic group. However, based on genomic analysis, it was revealed that both organisms belong to different domains. In 1977, the American biophysicist and microbiologist revealed the third domain of life, which is known as archaea. This is achieved by the analysis of phylogenetic taxonomy of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA).

The other features that reveals that they are belonged to different domain are as follows:

The plasma membrane of archaea is made up of strikingly different lipids compared to those present in the plasma membrane of bacteria. The bacterial plasma membrane is comprised of ester-linked phospholipids like hapanoids and sterols, whereas the archaeal plasma membrane is comprised of diether glycerol or tetraether glycerol. Secondly, the cell wall of archaea is diverse compared to bacterial cell wall. This is because; the cell wall of archaea lacks peptidoglycan whereas the bacterial cell wall is made up of peptidoglycan.

Therefore, the above explained differences made this statement to disagree. Hence, archaea should be separated from the bacteria.

Answer 13

Ch. 20.1 - MICRO INQUIRY Given that the DC/HB pathway uses...Ch. 20.1 - Prob. 2MI Ch. 20.1 - Prob. 1RIA Ch. 20.1 - Why do methanogens use the reductive acetyl-CoA...Ch. 20.1 - Prob. 3RIA Ch. 20.1 - Compare the ATP and NADH yield of each of the...Ch. 20.2 - MICRO INQUIRY Identify the potential electron...Ch. 20.3 - Retrieve, Infer, Apply What are thermoacidophiles...Ch. 20.3 - Prob. 2RIA Ch. 20.3 - Compare the carbon and sulfur metabolism of...

Some believe that archaea should not be separate from bacteria because both groups are prokaryotic. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your reasoning.

Solution Summary: The author explains that archaea and bacteria are referred to as prokaryotic unicellular organisms.

Concept explainers

Videos

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 20 Solutions