In late July 2017, senior management at Equifax. a U.S. credit-reporting company, discovered that hackers had stolen the personal data of more than 145 million U.S. customers, including names, birthdates, Social Cecurity numbers. and driver's license information. In addition, the hackers stole credit card information for more than 200,000 Equifax customers.
If that weren't bad enough. reports soon surfaced that three top executives, including Equifax's chief financial officer, sold close to $2 million in shares of company stock days after learning about the breach and more than a month before the company announced the data hack publicly. In a company statement, Equifax says the executives "had no knowledge that an intrusion had occurred at the time they sold their shares." The day after the company's announcement about the breach, Equifax's stock dropped by double digits, and the Department of Justice opened a criminal investigation.
Less than three weeks after the public announcement, Equifax announced its CEO, Richard Smith, would retire, taking a multimillion-dollar payout with him-even after shareholders lost more than $5 billion in stock value after the data breach was acknowledged.
Ethical Dilemma: Is it legal for company executives to sell stock shares for financial gain when they know
To determine:
Whether selling shares for financial gain is considered as legal for the company when they knew the company details were hacked but outsiders.
Introduction:
Ethical in business terms means what is professionally acceptable which includes morality and ethical issues which may arise in a business environment. Ethics applies to all the aspects of business products or services and if a company is not bound to those ethics it will have to face major regulatory breach problems.
Explanation of Solution
It is not legal for the company executives to sell stock shares for financial gain after knowing the company details were hacked but outsiders. This is not ethical, as it is a sign of deceiving the shareholders and stealing their money without letting them know about the real situation of the company.
Besides this, the CEO of the company had taken an amount of money before retiring which will bring up major issues that the company would have to face. It will bring up fraudulent laws and so on as it was not an ethical move.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 16 Solutions
Introduction to Business
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Financial Accounting, Student Value Edition (5th Edition)
Corporate Finance (4th Edition) (Pearson Series in Finance) - Standalone book
Intermediate Accounting (2nd Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Foundations Of Finance
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in Intro to Business)
- I won't to this question answer general accountingarrow_forwardC Company purchased an asset for $97,500 on January 1, Year 1. The asset was expected to have a four-year life and an $9,000 salvage value. What would be the amount of depreciation expense for Year 1 using double-declining balance? Need answerarrow_forwardC Company purchased an asset for $97,500 on January 1, Year 1. The asset was expected to have a four-year life and an $9,000 salvage value. What would be the amount of depreciation expense for Year 1 using double-declining balance?arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education