Since they like to eat out, each prefers a restaurant meal to the frozen dinner, but they enjoy their favorite food much more than the other type. Suppose that Linda and Mel have the following payoff matrices, where the numbers represent degree of enjoyment:
Does either player have a dominated strategy? How should they resolve their dilemma?
Answer to Problem 1EA
Solution: No player has a dominated strategy.
Explanation of Solution
Given: Payoff matrix of person L,
And the payoff matrix of M,
Each player has two strategies, C for Chinese restaurant and F for a French restaurant.
Explanation:
A dominated strategy is the strategy that always gives a player lesser payoff than other strategies, given whatever other player does.
In this case, no strategy is dominated by another strategy for either player. The dilemma is resolved by choosing either of the Nash equilibrium, which is both players going to either a Chinese or French restaurant.
Conclusion: No dominated strategy exists for either player.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Finite Mathematics (11th Edition)
- My neighborhood has a lot of dogs. In fact, when I walk my dog, Wrigley, only 2% of the time do we not see any other dogs. Gary has three dogs (Salsa, Nacho, and Dublin), and we see only Gary and his dogs about 30% of the time when we are on a walk. Lesley has two dogs (Buster and Oreo), and we see only Lesley and her dogs 20% of the time when we are on a walk. Gary and Lesley’s dogs don’t get along; we never see them at the same time. Margo has one dog (Bond), and we see only Margo and Bond 25% of the time when we are on a walk. 10% of the time we see Margo and Lesley. What is the probability that Wrigley and I see both Gary (Salsa, Nacho and Dublin) and Margo (Bond) on a walk? What is the probability we see at least one dog owner on our walk? What is the probability we see only Margo or only Gary? Are the events seeing Gary and seeing Margo independent? EXPLAIN briefly. Are the events of seeing Lesley and seeing Gary mutually exclusive? EXPLAIN briefly.arrow_forwardThe city of San Fransokyo is a high-tech city, especially in the field of robotics. There are three big companies that rule the city: Granville, Axcel, and Hamada. The Granville company controls about 50% of the total robot manufacturing in the city of San Fransokyo; Axcel company controls 35%; while the rest is controlled by the Hamadacompany. Based on the information you have obtained, it turns out that 3% of the robots made by Granville have problems with the sensing ability ofthe robot. As much as 5% robots made by Axcel and 1% robots made by Hamada also have the same problem. You want to buy a robot to help with your business and randomly pick up exactly one robot from the three companies. After the item arrives, you do a test, and it turns out that the robot is experiencing a malfunction in its sensing component. Using the Bayes Rule approach, which company is predicted to make the robot you bought? Justify your answer with adequate calculations!arrow_forwardA construction company has a bid on two large construction projects. The president believes that the chances of winning the first contract is 55% and the chances of winning the second contract is 30% and that winning either contract is independent of winning the other. What are the chances the company will not win either contract?arrow_forward
- Refer to the payoff matrix below: B1 B2 A1 2 -1 A2 -2 3 Determine the optimal strategy for both players and the value of the game.arrow_forwardBob and Doug play a lot of Ping-Pong, but Doug is a much better player, and wins 60% of their games.To make up for this, if Doug wins a game he will spot Bob five points in their next game. If Doug wins again he will spot Bob ten points the next game, and if he still wins the next game he will spot him fifteen points, and continue to spot him fifteen points as long as he keeps winning. Whenever Bob wins a game he goes back to playing the next game with no advantage.It turns out that with a five-point advantage Bob wins 60% of the time; he wins 70% of the time with a ten-point advantage and 90% of the time with a fifteen-point advantage.Model this situation as a Markov chain using the number of consecutive games won by Doug as the states. There should be four states representing zero, one, two, and three or more consecutive games won by Doug. Find the transition matrix of this system, the steady-state vector for the system, and determine the proportion of games that Doug will win in the…arrow_forwardBob and Doug play a lot of Ping-Pong, but Doug is a much better player, and wins 60% of their games.To make up for this, if Doug wins a game he will spot Bob five points in their next game. If Doug wins again he will spot Bob ten points the next game, and if he still wins the next game he will spot him fifteen points, and continue to spot him fifteen points as long as he keeps winning. Whenever Bob wins a game he goes back to playing the next game with no advantage.It turns out that with a five-point advantage Bob wins 60% of the time; he wins 60% of the time with a ten-point advantage and 60% of the time with a fifteen-point advantage.Model this situation as a Markov chain using the number of consecutive games won by Doug as the states. There should be four states representing zero, one, two, and three or more consecutive games won by Doug. Find the transition matrix of this system, the steady-state vector for the system, and determine the proportion of games that Doug will win in the…arrow_forward
- The city of San Fransokyo is a high-tech city, especially in the field of robotics. There are three big companies that rule the city: Granville, Axcel, and Hamada. The Granville company controls about 50% of the total robot manufacturing in the city of San Fransokyo; Axcel company controls 35%; while the rest is controlled by the Hamada company. Based on the information you have obtained, it turns out that 3% of the robots made by Granville have problems with the sensing ability of the robot. As much as 5% robots made by Axcel and 1% robots made by Hamada also have the same problem. You want to buy a robot to help with your business and randomly pick up exactly one robot from the three companies. After the item arrives, you do a test, and it turns out that the robot is experiencing a malfunction in its sensing component. Using the Bayes Rule approach, which company is predicted to make the robot you bought? Justify your answer with adequate calculations!arrow_forwardBob and Doug play a lot of Ping-Pong, but Doug is a much better player, and wins 60% of their games. To make up for this, if Doug wins a game he will spot Bob five points in their next game. If Doug wins again he will spot Bob ten points the next game, and if he still wins the next game he will spot him fifteen points, and continue to spot him fifteen points as long as he keeps winning. Whenever Bob wins a game he goes back to playing the next game with no advantage. It turns out that with a five-point advantage Bob wins 70% of the time; he wins 80% of the time with a ten-point advantage and 90% of the time with a fifteen-point advantage. Model this situation as a Markov chain using the number of consecutive games won by Doug as the states. There should be four states representing zero, one, two, and three or more consecutive game won by Doug. Find the transition matrix of this system, the steady-state vector for the system, and determine the proportion of games that Doug will win in…arrow_forwardBob and Doug play a lot of Ping-Pong, but Doug is a much better player, and wins 60% of their games. To make up for this, if Doug wins a game he will spot Bob five points in their next game. If Doug wins again he will spot Bob ten points the next game, and if he still wins the next game he will spot him fifteen points, and continue to spot him fifteen points as long as he keeps winning. Whenever Bob wins a game he goes back to playing the next game with no advantage. It turns out that with a five-point advantage Bob wins 40% of the time; he wins 70% of the time with a ten-point advantage and 70% of the time with a fifteen-point advantage. Model this situation as a Markov chain using the number of consecutive games won by Doug as the states. There should be four states representing zero, one, two, and three or more consecutive games won by Doug. Find the transition matrix of this system, the steady-state vector for the system, and determine the proportion of games that Doug will win in…arrow_forward
- In a union-management negotiation, the following are the percentages of annual wage increase gained by the Union for various combination of union and management strategies: Management M1 M2 M3 U1 1 3 3 U2 4 2 2 Union U3 3 1 4 U4 3 3 2 U5 3 1 2 Determine the best strategies and values of the game for the union and management respectively.arrow_forwardBob and Doug play a lot of Ping-Pong, but Doug is a much better player, and wins 80% of their games. To make up for this, if Doug wins a game he will spot Bob five points in their next game. If Doug wins again he will spot Bob ten points the next game, and if he still wins the next game he will spot him fifteen points, and continue to spot him fifteen points as long as he keeps winning. Whenever Bob wins a game he goes back to playing the next game with no advantage. It turns out that with a five-point advantage Bob wins 40% of the time; he wins 70% of the time with a ten-point advantage and 90% of the time with a fifteen-point advantage. Model this situation as a Markov chain using the number of consecutive games won by Doug as the states. There should be four states representing zero, one, two, and three or more consecutive games won by Doug. Find the transition matrix of this system, the steady-state vector for system, and determine the proportion games that Doug will win the long…arrow_forwardBob and Doug play a lot of Ping-Pong, but Doug is a much better player, and wins 80% of their games. To make up for this, if Doug wins a game he will spot Bob five points in their next game. If Doug wins again he will spot Bob ten points the next game, and if he still wins the next game he will spot him fifteen points, and continue to spot him fifteen points as long as he keeps winning. Whenever Bob wins a game he goes back to playing the next game with no advantage. It turns out that with a five-point advantage Bob wins 20% of the time; he wins 50% of the time with a ten-point advantage and 80% of the time with a fifteen-point advantage. Model this situation as a Markov chain using the number of consecutive games won by Doug as the states. There should be four states representing zero, one, two, and three or more consecutive games won by Doug. Find the transition matrix of this system, the steady-state vector for the system, and determine the proportion of games that Doug will win in…arrow_forward
- Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications ( 8th I...MathISBN:9781259676512Author:Kenneth H RosenPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationMathematics for Elementary Teachers with Activiti...MathISBN:9780134392790Author:Beckmann, SybillaPublisher:PEARSON
- Thinking Mathematically (7th Edition)MathISBN:9780134683713Author:Robert F. BlitzerPublisher:PEARSONDiscrete Mathematics With ApplicationsMathISBN:9781337694193Author:EPP, Susanna S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Pathways To Math Literacy (looseleaf)MathISBN:9781259985607Author:David Sobecki Professor, Brian A. MercerPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education