Suppose that there is an environmental policy that could reduce the average concentration of a toxic substance to which 3 million people are exposed. Suppose that as a result of the reduction in exposure the risk of death reduces from 1 out of 50,000 to 1 out of 60,000. a. What is the expected number of lives that could potentially be saved from this environmental policy? a. If each of the 3 million people who are exposed is willing to pay $8 for this reduction in risk, then what is the implied value of a statistical life that is potentially saved as a result of this environmental policy? a. Your boss asks you to estimate what must be the maximum cost of such an environmental policy. Provide a justification for the upper limit on the cost of such an environmental policy.

Suppose that there is an environmental policy that could reduce the average concentration of a toxic substance to which 3 million people are exposed. Suppose that as a result of the reduction in exposure the risk of death reduces from 1 out of 50,000 to 1 out of 60,000. a. What is the expected number of lives that could potentially be saved from this environmental policy? a. If each of the 3 million people who are exposed is willing to pay $8 for this reduction in risk, then what is the implied value of a statistical life that is potentially saved as a result of this environmental policy? a. Your boss asks you to estimate what must be the maximum cost of such an environmental policy. Provide a justification for the upper limit on the cost of such an environmental policy.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

There are two fishermen, Zach and Jacob. They would each benefit if lighthouses were built along the coast where they fish. The marginal cost of building a lighthouse is $100. The marginal benefit that Zach gets from each lighthouse is 90 - Q, where Q is the number of lighthouses. The marginal benefit that Jacob gets from each lighthouse is 40 - Q. 1. What is the efficient number of lighthouses? 2. What is Zach's marginal benefit of lighthouses at the efficient quantity? 3. Would Zach have been willing to pay for the last additional lighthouse at the efficient quantity? a) Yes b) No
In environmental economics: Suppose that society wants to reduce the quantity of discharged residuals into the natural environment, what are 3 ways to do so? What are some obstacles that could be associated with each one?
how does implication of standards within environmental economics look like on a graph?
Give answer and take like
Identify the following situations as an example of a negative or a positive externality: a. You are a birder (bird watcher), and your neighbor has put up several birdhouses in the yard as well as planting trees and flowers that attract birds. b. Your neighbor paints his house a hideous color. c. Investments in private education raise your country’s standard of living. d. Trash dumped upstream flows downstream right past your home. e. Your roommate is a smoker, but you are a nonsmoker.
Economists Kenneth Chay and Michael Greenstone found that in the two years following the passage of the Clean Air Act of 1970, the sharp reduction in air pollution also led to a decline in infant deaths. Although this and other studies provide compelling evidence of the link between pollution and infant health, it is not clear that reductions from the much lower levels of ambient pollution today would have the same effect. Which of the following reasons could explain this? A. Today, the level of pollution is much higher. Therefore, it will take a much larger reduction in air pollution to reap benefits similar to those in 1970. B. When levels of pollution are high, the marginal benefit of reducing pollution also is high. It follows therefore that the benefit of reducing air pollution in 1970 would be much higher than the benefit from a proportional reduction in air pollution today when the level of pollution is much lower. C. When levels of pollution are…
The following graph represents the market for high-emissions cars. Answer this question assuming that the externality is not internalised. 1. What is the private value of the last unit traded (or the willingness to pay of the marginal buyer) in the market? 2. What is the private cost of the last unit produced and traded (or the private cost to the marginal seller) in the market? 3. What is the social cost of the last unit traded in the market? 4. In the stylised model, what is the cost of pollution per high-emission vehicle purchased by buyers equal to?
What did the National Environmental Policy Act accomplish? Briefly describe the origin and mission of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
What are the four core concepts of environmental economics? Briefly discuss each concept.
Can extreme levels of pollution hurt the economic development of a high-income country? Why or why not?
Why is the efficient level of pollution not equal to zero?
Suppose an unvaccinated man Tom would get $10 of private benefit out of a flu shot. The flu shot costs $20 at the local clinic. The herd immunity benefit of the shot is worth an additional $15 to Tom's friends and co-workers. (1) What is the private cost incurred when Tom gets the shot? (2) Is it privately efficient for Tom to get the shot? (3) What is the public or social cost incurred when Tom gets the shot? (4) What is the public or social benefit when Tom gets the shot? (5) Is it publicly/socially efficient for Tom to get the shot? Hint: please consider only the information provided in the question. Any other potential cost or benefit can be ignored. Please explain your answers. Do not simply provide a Yes or No as the answer. If it involves calculations, show your steps.