Consider the following statement: "Gauss' law for electrostatics implies that a spherically symmetrical distribution of charges shields an interior charge from exterior charges but does not shield exterior charges from interior charges." Explaining. Suppose we have a hollow spherical shell, loaded with a spherically symmetric distribution. Let us assume that a proof load q is placed at the center of this distribution. So, if some other proof load is placed on the outer shell region, the inner proof load will not it will perceive (suffer force), whereas the load of proof that is in the outer region will perceive (suffers force). Does this represent an inevitable contradiction to Newton's third law? Explain.
11) Consider the following statement:
"Gauss' law for electrostatics implies that a spherically symmetrical distribution of charges shields an interior charge from exterior charges but does not shield exterior charges from interior charges."
Explaining. Suppose we have a hollow spherical shell, loaded with a spherically symmetric distribution. Let us assume that a proof load q is placed at the center of this distribution. So, if some other proof load is placed on the outer shell region, the inner proof load will not it will perceive (suffer force), whereas the load of proof that is in the outer region will perceive (suffers force).
Does this represent an inevitable contradiction to
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
