1. What factors led to the cause you are studying? 2. Summarize in one sentence how the cause led to war: 3. What is the connection of the image to the cause? 4. What could have been done to prevent the cause from leading to war?

icon
Related questions
Question
1. What factors led to the cause you are studying? 2. Summarize in one sentence how the cause led to war: 3. What is the connection of the image to the cause? 4. What could have been done to prevent the cause from leading to war?
I. Imperialism
"Imperialism was clearly a contributing cause of World War I. The competition for overseas possessions often
brought European powers into conflict. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Germany became more and
more aggressive in its quest for imperial possessions. In 1905, the leading imperial powers acceded to
Germany's demand for a conference to dispute French control of Morocco. Though Germany gained nothing,
other nations began to view Germany as a threat to stability in Europe. Britain and France had vied for control
of areas in Africa, the Middle East, and the Indian subcontinent. It was not until the Anglo-French Entente of
1904 that the two nations finally settled their colonial disputes. Many the "entangling alliances" that historians
often cite as a premier cause of World War I actually came about as a result of conflicts over imperialism."
"What was most strikingly novel about the new imperialism was its intense concentration upon two continents:
Africa and eastern Asia. These were the only two important areas of the globe still not brought under European
influence before 1870. The decades between 1870 and 1914 speedily completed the expansion of European
influence and civilization over the whole of the earth; and it was accomplished in an era when the realism,
ruthlessness, and rivalries of European national governments were exceptionally great. It therefore had a temper
uniquely masterful and remorseless, brooking no obstacles and pushfully self-assertive. This quality came as
much from the nature of European politics as from the urges of European economic development. There was no
international organization fitted to exercise any kind of control or regulation over the scramble for territories in
which the great powers now indulged. The naked power politics of the new colonialism were the projection,
onto an overseas screen, of the interstate frictions and rivalries of Europe. It was this combination of novel
economic conditions with anarchic political relations which explained the nature of the new imperialism.
Among the economic forces behind it, the urge to find new outlets for the "glut of capital" and fresh markets for
industrial output were in general more important than either the quest for raw materials or the factor of
overpopulation."2
Transcribed Image Text:I. Imperialism "Imperialism was clearly a contributing cause of World War I. The competition for overseas possessions often brought European powers into conflict. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Germany became more and more aggressive in its quest for imperial possessions. In 1905, the leading imperial powers acceded to Germany's demand for a conference to dispute French control of Morocco. Though Germany gained nothing, other nations began to view Germany as a threat to stability in Europe. Britain and France had vied for control of areas in Africa, the Middle East, and the Indian subcontinent. It was not until the Anglo-French Entente of 1904 that the two nations finally settled their colonial disputes. Many the "entangling alliances" that historians often cite as a premier cause of World War I actually came about as a result of conflicts over imperialism." "What was most strikingly novel about the new imperialism was its intense concentration upon two continents: Africa and eastern Asia. These were the only two important areas of the globe still not brought under European influence before 1870. The decades between 1870 and 1914 speedily completed the expansion of European influence and civilization over the whole of the earth; and it was accomplished in an era when the realism, ruthlessness, and rivalries of European national governments were exceptionally great. It therefore had a temper uniquely masterful and remorseless, brooking no obstacles and pushfully self-assertive. This quality came as much from the nature of European politics as from the urges of European economic development. There was no international organization fitted to exercise any kind of control or regulation over the scramble for territories in which the great powers now indulged. The naked power politics of the new colonialism were the projection, onto an overseas screen, of the interstate frictions and rivalries of Europe. It was this combination of novel economic conditions with anarchic political relations which explained the nature of the new imperialism. Among the economic forces behind it, the urge to find new outlets for the "glut of capital" and fresh markets for industrial output were in general more important than either the quest for raw materials or the factor of overpopulation."2
OVERSEAS EMPIRES of EUROPEAN POWERS, January 1914.
ef..
Ru
Manclr
Unlted 3ates
a diw wegs
Thet
ul Hai
Cary
Indip
bhoW p
Eut Indi
ל1AXפא 1
a S ante
Amgrica
OCEAN
Aaralie
ni ilidate ol 16Srdi
Jaonitnoodue neibnl ori b S
Atbinoloo iod
76w
Zaland
bea Fruh Genan Dnh
Blgan al tgne ian
Speish
Dionte Preindn
Transcribed Image Text:OVERSEAS EMPIRES of EUROPEAN POWERS, January 1914. ef.. Ru Manclr Unlted 3ates a diw wegs Thet ul Hai Cary Indip bhoW p Eut Indi ל1AXפא 1 a S ante Amgrica OCEAN Aaralie ni ilidate ol 16Srdi Jaonitnoodue neibnl ori b S Atbinoloo iod 76w Zaland bea Fruh Genan Dnh Blgan al tgne ian Speish Dionte Preindn
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer