EDUC5440 week 6

docx

School

University of the People *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

5440

Subject

Statistics

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by ColonelValor486

University of the People EDUC5440 Discussion Week 6 Question , ‘Review of computer-based assessment for learning in elementary and secondary education’ located in this Unit’s reading assignment. Analyze whether you would welcome the use of computer-based formative assessments in your classroom, or whether you would prefer to continue with your reliable paper-based formative assessments. Explain why or why not. Answers I prefer to continue with paper-based formative assessments because they are always more fair and reliable. Paper-based formative assessments are one of the traditional methods for gathering this feedback, and they can take various forms, such as quizzes, tests, worksheets, and assignments. It also prevents people from cheating each other. Moreover, it is effective and efficient. Hence, a power outage will not affect the assessment. For instance, in Guyana, we always have constant electrical problems, and we often have sudden power cuts; therefore, with the paper-based assessment, the teacher usually prepares it one week before the test is due. Hence, if there are power outages on the same day the assessment is conducted, it never affects the process. However, the concept of paper-based formative assessments, their advantages and disadvantages, Firstly, the advantages of Paper-Based Formative Assessments are that Paper-based assessments

can cover a wide range of topics, subjects, and skills. They can include multiple-choice questions, short-answer questions, essays, and more, making them suitable for various learning objectives. Also, They are relatively simple to administer and can be conducted in a classroom without requiring specialized technology or equipment. Teachers can provide timely feedback, crucial for students to identify and correct mistakes, reinforcing the learning process. Hence, Multiple-choice questions can be scored objectively and quickly, reducing the potential for bias in grading. Paper-based assessments can be stored as historical records of a student's progress. Many educators and students are familiar with this format, which may contribute to a sense of familiarity and comfort. On the other hand, paper-based formative assessments have disadvantages. They are typically static and need more interactivity and multimedia elements that digital assessments can offer. Also, scoring open-ended questions can be time-consuming for educators, especially in larger classes. Paper-based assessments may not provide detailed analytics on a student's performance, making it challenging to identify specific areas where students need improvement. Using paper can contribute to environmental concerns, including deforestation and waste production. In conclusion, Incorporating formative assessments, whether paper-based or digital, can significantly enhance the learning process, provided that educators use them effectively to inform instruction and support student progress. It is essential to choose the correct assessment method based on your educational objectives and the needs of your students.

References: Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148. Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative Assessment. ASCD. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. . Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Expanding Views About Formative Classroom Assessment: A Review of the Literature. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(4), 33-37. University of the People EDUC5440 Written essay Week 6

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

● explain and analyze how the PISA results impact your country positively The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is a well-known assessment that evaluates the performance of 15-year-old students in mathematics, science, and reading. PISA findings can positively impact a country: PISA allows countries to compare their educational systems to international norms. Positive PISA results can show that a country's educational practices are practical and competitive globally, bringing important acknowledgment and legitimacy. PISA results can be used to spark educational policy creation and reform. Low test scores may spark initiatives to enhance educational quality, curriculum, teaching methods, and resources, resulting in beneficial improvements in the educational system. As a result, PISA gives detailed statistics on students' performance in various categories, enabling policymakers and educators to assess the strengths and shortcomings of their respective education systems. Positive outcomes can identify areas of excellence that can be further developed. A country with high PISA scores can improve its global reputation for having a high- quality education system. This could recruit international students, stimulate cultural interchange, and increase the country's soft power. Furthermore, an educated workforce is critical for economic growth and innovation. Positive PISA results indicate to potential investors that the country has a skilled labor force, which can encourage economic development and job creation. PISA data may highlight educational achievement discrepancies between student groups. A favorable reaction to this information could result in educational policies that stress equity and inclusion. PISA results can spur teacher

professional development and training investments, ultimately benefiting educational quality. A highly qualified and motivated teaching staff is critical to student success. Based on PISA data, policymakers may more efficiently allocate resources, allocating funding and support to places most needed, resulting in more equitable access to quality education. An emphasis on improving education in reaction to PISA results can result in better student learning outcomes, boosting their skills and knowledge over time. Positive PISA results can encourage collaboration with other countries and organizations to share quality practices and educational innovations, which benefits all parties. ● Explain and analyze how the PISA results impact your country negatively. PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) findings can negatively influence a country in various ways, and these repercussions are frequently dependent on the precise outcomes and rankings. The following is an examination of how poor PISA results can affect a country, emphasizing potential implications and challenges: Poor PISA scores can harm a country's international standing. It could be interpreted as a reflection of a lower-quality education system, discouraging international students from considering the country for higher education and harming its global image. The quality of a country's education system is closely related to its economic competitiveness. Negative PISA results indicate that the workforce needs to be more skilled, preventing foreign investment and harming the country's economic growth. Furthermore, poor PISA results can pressure the government to implement educational reforms, typically quickly, to raise scores. These improvements must be adequately thought out or long- term, causing confusion and disruptions in the school system. When a country scores poorly on the PISA, teachers may feel depressed because they may be wrongly criticized for the outcomes.

This can impact job happiness, teacher retention, and overall educational quality. Governments may respond to poor PISA results by increasing standardized testing and emphasizing test preparation. This may result in a narrower curriculum, test-driven teaching, and a less well-rounded education. The emphasis on PISA results causes students to become stressed and anxious, as the results can substantially impact a country's opinion of its education system. This stress might hurt students' mental health. Furthermore, negative PISA results may increase educational inequality. Policymakers may direct resources and attention to children falling behind while ignoring the needs of those performing well. Higher PISA scores may foster rote learning, leaving less possibility for innovative teaching approaches, critical thinking, and creativity. In response to poor PISA results, governments may feel obligated to invest more in education, thereby straining budgets and necessitating the reallocation of resources from other areas. Negative PISA results can diminish public trust in the education system, potentially leading to less support for education programs and making positive improvements more challenging to implement. Reference: OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. OECD Publishing.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version