DOC-20231201-WA0033

pdf

School

Bahauddin Zakaria University, Multan *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1403

Subject

Sociology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

Uploaded by CoachFrog3727

Shawnee Mission East High School Quick Submit Quick Submit DOC-20231201-WA0033.docx Ok Ok Document Details Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340 Submission Date Dec 1, 2023, 2:35 AM CST Download Date Dec 1, 2023, 2:36 AM CST File Name DOC-20231201-WA0033.docx File Size 20.7 KB 10 Pages 2,758 Words 16,850 Characters Page 1 of 12 - Cover Page Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340 Page 1 of 12 - Cover Page Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340

How much of this submission has been generated by AI? 0% of qualifying text in this submission has been determined to be generated by AI. Caution: Percentage may not indicate academic misconduct. Review required. It is essential to understand the limitations of AI detection before making decisions about a student's work. We encourage you to learn more about Turnitin's AI detection capabilities before using the tool. Frequently Asked Questions What does the percentage mean? The percentage shown in the AI writing detection indicator and in the AI writing report is the amount of qualifying text within the submission that Turnitin's AI writing detection model determines was generated by AI. Our testing has found that there is a higher incidence of false positives when the percentage is less than 20. In order to reduce the likelihood of misinterpretation, the AI indicator will display an asterisk for percentages less than 20 to call attention to the fact that the score is less reliable. However, the final decision on whether any misconduct has occurred rests with the reviewer/instructor. They should use the percentage as a means to start a formative conversation with their student and/or use it to examine the submitted assignment in greater detail according to their school's policies. How does Turnitin's indicator address false positives? Our model only processes qualifying text in the form of long-form writing. Long-form writing means individual sentences contained in paragraphs that make up a longer piece of written work, such as an essay, a dissertation, or an article, etc. Qualifying text that has been determined to be AI-generated will be highlighted blue on the submission text. Non-qualifying text, such as bullet points, annotated bibliographies, etc., will not be processed and can create disparity between the submission highlights and the percentage shown. What does 'qualifying text' mean? Sometimes false positives (incorrectly flagging human-written text as AI-generated), can include lists without a lot of structural variation, text that literally repeats itself, or text that has been paraphrased without developing new ideas. If our indicator shows a higher amount of AI writing in such text, we advise you to take that into consideration when looking at the percentage indicated. In a longer document with a mix of authentic writing and AI generated text, it can be difficult to exactly determine where the AI writing begins and original writing ends, but our model should give you a reliable guide to start conversations with the submitting student. Disclaimer Our AI writing assessment is designed to help educators identify text that might be prepared by a generative AI tool. Our AI writing assessment may not always be accurate (it may misidentify both human and AI-generated text) so it should not be used as the sole basis for adverse actions against a student. It takes further scrutiny and human judgment in conjunction with an organization's application of its specific academic policies to determine whether any academic misconduct has occurred. Page 2 of 12 - AI Writing Overview Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340 Page 2 of 12 - AI Writing Overview Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340

Introduction: This essay explores the social work concept of intersectionality, which highlights the interdependence of different perspectives, power dynamics, and structural oppressions. Intersectionality helps social workers understand the complex web of privilege and disadvantage by illuminating the inequalities and the balance of power within societal structures. An comprehensive anti-racial strategy that tackles power dynamics head-on is demanded for by the research, which emphasises the relevance of social welfare solutions and situational knowledge. Body 1: Intersectionality and Anti-Oppressive Social Work Practice Definition and Conceptual Understanding of Intersectionality. Kimberlé Crenshaw's 1989 definition of the term is cited extensively in the author's critique of the theory supporting the concept of intersectionality. Recognising the interconnected nature of injustice and privilege in modern society, the author concedes that this paradigm is essential. A comprehensive critical review is required to address the many issues that arise from anti-oppressive social work practise, particularly in relation to the idea of allyship. In his proposal, Crenshaw delves deeply into a number of topics, including the complex relationship amongst race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic Crenshaw draws attention to the complex web of relationships between people's many identities, which allows for a more nuanced perspective on the world. In order to fully grasp the myriad of experiences that people go through, this framework stresses the importance of identifying and comprehending the interplay of several identities. As a lens used to examine and understand the intricacies of human existence, Crenshaw's idea sheds light on the intricate mechanisms operating in the territory of identity. Despite the concept's theoretical strength, the author contends that social workers must adopt an exclusive position approach in order to put intersectionality into action. Understanding the notion is insufficient for effective integration; active allyship is required. It is impossible to Page 3 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340 Page 3 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

exaggerate the importance of friends in challenging authoritarian regimes and speaking out for oppressed communities. Scholars Patricia Hill Collins, the founder and Sirma Bilge explore the idea of intersectionality in further depth in their publications, illuminating its relevance to comprehending the intricate relationship between different oppressive regimes. By drawing attention to the ways in which these systems are interdependent, they serve to strengthen and sustain one another. Through their work, Collins and Bilge enhance our comprehension of the complex dynamics at play when several oppressions interact with one another and when identities that overlap face intensified marginalisation. In addition, the possibility for intersectionality's richness to be decreased makes it vital to critically assess its use in practise. Oversimplification and compartmentalization of clients' experiences pose a risk that can lead to this. According to the author, allies are unable to address the intricate intersections of oppression when they engage in reductionism. An important paradigm for understanding the complexities of oppression and identity, according to the author, is intersectionality. Though they acknowledge its usefulness in anti-oppressive social work, they contend that allyship is crucial to its successful integration. Allies in social work, according to the author, confront the difficulty of working within bureaucratic institutions that put real constraints on their initiatives. The authors go on to say that these supporters also need to understand the complexity of intersectionality and how different oppressions are interrelated. In addition, the author stresses that in order to help dismantle oppression, it is crucial to confront one's own privilege. Key aspects of intersectionality, Their findings contribute to the expanding corpus of literature that examines the contemporary world through the lens of intersectionality, illuminating the intricate relationship between power and privilege. The user argues that social work allies should not limit themselves to merely being knowledgeable about oppressive practises; rather, they should actively seek to dismantle systemic barriers and challenge the institutional norms Page 4 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340 Page 4 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340

that perpetuate inequality. In other words, we need to do more than just recognise the issues; we need to actively work to dismantle oppressive systems. Collins and other researchers have highlighted the need of investigating the inherent complexity of identities. The author emphasises the importance of knowing one's whole identity, which is the sum of all of one's parts. To put this information into action, they argue, privileged people must acknowledge their own privilege and work to create inclusive environments. Recognising the interdependence of oppressive systems is crucial, however the author emphasises the challenges of applying intersectionality in social work. Because of the limitations imposed by bureaucratic processes, allies could struggle to navigate the intricate dynamics of advantages as well as drawback that their clients face.  Recognizing The Interlocking Systems Of Oppression As the author so astutely points out, it is crucial to observe the interplay between different repressive regimes and the continuance of inequality. The author contends that allyship is crucial since it is not enough to simply recognise these institutions; one must actively work to demolish them. The results of this study demonstrate that oppression is complex and calls for a comprehensive response. The author argues that with the support of allies, it is possible to destroy interdependent repressive systems. Their central argument is that oppression is always contextual, occurring at the intersection of gender, sexual orientation, class, race, and class. In this perspective, the need of recognising oppression for what it is and the need for comprehensive efforts to end it are both emphasised. Allies must comprehend these intricate connections if they are to spearhead effective movements for systemic change. The user acknowledges an ally who supports LGBTQ+ rights in their statement. This ally's solidarity with the LGBTQ community demonstrates their understanding of the interrelated nature of the challenges faced by the LGBTQ community, including economic inequality and racism. The ally demonstrates a more nuanced understanding of the many struggles faced by LGBTQ+ individuals by recognising these links.  The Complexity Of Identities. Page 5 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340 Page 5 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340

An essential part of comprehending allyship is delving into the complexities of identities. It calls on people to completely recognise and value the complex and multidimensional character of identity. Through this approach, people can gain a more profound comprehension of the varied viewpoints and experiences of marginalised communities. A deeper and more encompassing grasp of this concept enables individuals to empathise with and support others, which is crucial for effective allyship. The declaration recognises that allies realise that people have multiple identities, some of which overlap, and that these identities impact how people experience privilege and oppression. In order to navigate their privileged situations effectively and use them to help marginalised populations, allies must comprehend this nuanced matter. The author argues that those who are privileged, whether racially or economically, can help bring about change in areas where inequality is most pervasive. The more affluent people are willing to admit they have an advantage, the more they will be able to comprehend the structural obstacles and rally behind causes that aim to eliminate these gaps. A more educated and compassionate strategy to combat inequality can be achieved through this acknowledgment of privilege, which in turn leads to more substantial and lasting transformation. Body2. Promoting Inclusive Practice (under this point I will be discussing) GOOD  How intersectionality allows social workers to recognise the multiple layers of privilege and disadvantage individuals may face. The concept of intersectionality is often lauded as an essential theoretical framework among social workers. Critically, it enlightens experts on the complex relationship between human privilege and hardship. According to the user, who references McCall (2005) and she & Anzaldua (1983), intersectionality is crucial in social work. This allows practitioners to recognise the complexities of power and oppression, rather than depending on oversimplified categorizations. Using these theoretical frameworks, social workers can better comprehend the complexities of social inequality and advocate for more fair and inclusive practises. Page 6 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340 Page 6 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Recognising the connection between several social categories is crucial, according to McCall's research, in order to comprehend how people cope with privilege and adversity on multiple fronts simultaneously. Because it underpins their work, social workers must have a firm grasp of this concept. This makes them more able to understand the complexities of people's many identities and develop strategies to deal with them. Recognising the complexities of people's observations in practise could be problematic, as the author concedes. Once this is recognised, it's frequently important to deviate from the traditional wisdom that tends to simplify and compartmentalise these experiences.  Studies that highlight the importance of inclusive and intersectional approaches in challenging oppressive structures. (Hankivsky, 2010), ( Dei, 2000) For a complete knowledge of the lived reality of marginalised populations, intersectionality is vital (Morga and Anzaldua, 1983). As a means of better understanding the complex web of discrimination that individuals encounter, social workers might embrace an intersectional approach. Using this perspective, they may observe how different forms of prejudice have cumulative and interdependent impacts on people. By considering and evaluating these compound impacts, social workers may better design individualised support systems to address their clients' unique needs. It is challenging to implement this idea in bureaucratic institutions, the author admits, because of constraints like time and resources. They highlight the need for sophisticated and intersectional solutions. Both Hankivsky (2010) and Rai (2000) argue that social workers must fight oppressive institutions by employing intersectional and inclusive strategies. The findings presented here emphasise the vital relevance of an intersectional perspective in the fight against systemic injustices. Social care providers must, therefore, address systemic discrimination directly, as they emphasise. These studies highlight the importance of considering oppression and discrimination from several perspectives, or "intersections," due to the interconnectedness of these issues. Adopting a critical stance that acknowledges and challenges the systemic barriers that sustain inequality is advocated for social workers as a means to advance more egalitarian and transparent Page 7 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340 Page 7 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340

societal practises. Since these approaches necessitate a radical change in the culture and policies of the organisation, they typically encounter resistance from long-standing traditions and power structures. In principle, the user argues, social workers are equipped to comprehend and negotiate the complex processes of disadvantage and advantage through the lens of intersectionality. Nevertheless, the user asserts that there are substantial obstacles to putting intersectionality into practise. A new way of looking is necessary, according to the author, for social work frameworks to incorporate intersectional perspectives. A reorganisation of power dynamics is necessitated by this change, which questions the status quo. Using intersectionality as a lens, the author sheds light on the complexities of oppression and privilege. In order to successfully include intersectionality, it stresses that social work must critically evaluate its present practises. In this article, the author discusses the difficulties social workers encounter while trying to promote intersectional practises, use intersectionality, and overcome systemic barriers. Body 3: Acknowledging Power Dynamics ALL GOOD POINTS  Demonstrate how intersectionality helps social workers become aware of power dynamics and hierarchies within different societal structures. (collins, 1990) In order to understand the intricate web of power relations and hierarchies that exists within society, social workers can use the paradigm of intersectionality, first proposed by Collins (1990). Understanding the complex power relations that result from the intersections of various oppressions is crucial, as Collins' approach emphasises. Collins stresses the need of recognising and addressing the multidimensional nature of oppression by illuminating these intricacies. The importance of intersectionality in clarifying different dynamics is recognised by the user. On the other hand, they show how hard it is to turn this knowledge into real solutions. What this means is that there Page 8 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340 Page 8 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340

are big hurdles to overcome when trying to put intersectionality into practise, even when we grasp it theoretically.  examples of power imbalances. There is merit to the claim that redressing power dynamics in social work calls for a holistic strategy. To successfully address this issue, a thorough and sophisticated strategy is required due to the intricate nature of the dynamics of power in social work. Social workers can take a more comprehensive approach to addressing power imbalances if they recognise their existence and the negative effects they have on disadvantaged individuals and communities. Proposing legislative reforms to acknowledge and eradicate systematic biases is an admirable endeavour, according to the user. The author stresses the need to challenge discriminatory legislation and long- standing social standards that uphold inequality. It is possible to undermine and dismantle existing structures of control and authority through the promotion of welcoming environments that value diversity of thought and experience. Some practises can be difficult to put into practise in the actual world, as the user's statement shows. To overcome opposition from current systems and make sure the intended changes are successfully implemented and maintained, it stresses the importance of continuous campaigning and structural improvements. The author stresses that social workers can better understand the nuances of power dynamics by embracing intersectionality. Being cognizant of these processes is insufficient, though, as it also stresses. In order to tackle the inequities head-on, we need to fight for inclusive practises in larger social systems and actively confront long- standing structures. This analysis highlights the need of working together to achieve significant change. Body 4: The Importance of Situated Knowledge and Context and its Impact on Assessment and Intervention Haraway (1988) emphasises the need of comprehending individuals' actual circumstances in the fields of social work and allyship. Recognising and acknowledging the diverse realities and perspectives of persons is vital for effectively engaging in Page 9 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340 Page 9 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

welcoming and encouraging practises, according to this method. By prioritising the acquisition of first-hand knowledge, social workers and their allies can forge deeper connections with the individuals they assist. The complexities of multiple identities and life experiences will be easier for them to handle with this. The author holds the view that friends take the initiative to listen to and understand alternative points of view. When viewed through the prism of people's distinct social, ethnic, and historical origins, this demonstrates that allies are concerned about their experiences and wish to recognise their value and significance. This perspective appears to have theoretical and scholarly support, since Davis (2013) is cited. According to McLeod (2013), social workers should adopt an anti-racist approach that takes into account several intersections. This approach highlights the importance of identifying and addressing power imbalances within culturally sensitive treatments. Identifying power imbalances allows social workers to address them more effectively. This critical analysis sheds light on the significance of McLeod's concept and its implications for the field of social work. Based on their statement, it seems like they agree with the idea that allyship is changing. They emphasise the need to combat oppressive structures that uphold inequality and gain a knowledge of power dynamics. When social workers incorporate situated information and context into their intervention and evaluation practises, it has a substantial impact (Dominelli, 2002). By acknowledging the value of exploring individuals' and communities' specific circumstances, practitioners can get a more comprehensive and nuanced comprehension of the issues they are tackling. When compared to global endeavours, the integration mentioned in the term faces significant challenges, due to this critical viewpoint. The work of Dominelli (2002) delves further into the problems with ethnocentric universalism. Understanding the specifics of every scenario is vital for meeting people's diverse wants, she says. Dominelli brings attention to the need of individualised solutions and emphasises the significance of authenticity in fulfilling these needs. Page 10 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340 Page 10 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340

Recognising contextual knowledge is crucial, according to Beresford (2010), if we want individuals to be more involved in decision-making. The importance of understanding the specific context in which data is created and used is highlighted by this point of view. Recognising the impact of contextual elements allows individuals to make knowledgeable contributions to decision-making processes. This perspective empowers individuals by allowing them to draw from their personal knowledge and experiences, enhancing their decision-making abilities. Building inclusive spaces that address power imbalances without compromising the safety and autonomy of oppressed people is no easy feat, and this fact must not be overlooked. Safety, the author argues, is multi- faceted and contextual, reliant on many factors and perspectives. Social workers, according to them, need to employ an intersectional strategy to fight oppression, and those who do so should question the viability of actual anti-oppressive practises that don't. Aligning with diverse lived experiences and acknowledging situated knowledge are crucial for allyship to have effective in social work. Essay Conclusion: A comprehensive framework is provided by democratic social work practise, cooperation, and intersectionality. Addressing power disparities, recognising the importance of specific to the context details, and understanding and honouring an assortment of human experiences are important traits. However, encouraging diversity while avoiding power disparities remains a tough challenge. In order to effectively address complicated situations, establish inclusive places, and challenge systemic injustices, an anti-oppressive strategy that intersects with other efforts is essential. Justice for all, self-determination, and activism are the constants that must be upheld along the endless road. This is where allyship, intersectionality, and positive practise meet. Page 11 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340 Page 11 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340

Page 12 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340 Page 12 of 12 - AI Writing Submission Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2768368340

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

DOC-20231201-WA0033

Related Documents