Week_6_Assignment_feedback

docx

School

Capella University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

6015

Subject

Psychology

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

11

Uploaded by LieutenantArmadilloPerson128

Report
Week 6 Assignment: Case Study Analysis: Adolescence to Emerging Adulthood Criteria Ratings Pts Analyze lifespan development theories to determine the most appropriate theory or theories to apply to the case study. view longer description 67.5 to >57.38 pts DISTINGUISHED Analyzes lifespan development theories to determine the most appropriate theory or theories to apply to the case study and provides justification for the selection or selections by citing supporting research or relevant examples from similar circumstances. 57.38 to >47.25 pts PROFICIENT Analyzes lifespan development theories to 57.38 / 67.5 pts
Week 6 Assignment: Case Study Analysis: Adolescence to Emerging Adulthood Criteria Ratings Pts determine the most appropriate theory or theories to apply to the case study. 47.25 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies lifespan development theories to apply, but they are neither analyzed nor appropriate to the case study. 0 pts NON_PERFORMAN CE Does not identify lifespan development theories. Comments You considered both Schaie and parenting styles as options.
Week 6 Assignment: Case Study Analysis: Adolescence to Emerging Adulthood Criteria Ratings Pts Apply the appropriate lifespan development theory to support an identified intervention process. view longer description 67.5 to >57.38 pts DISTINGUISHED Applies the appropriate lifespan development theory to support an identified intervention process and supports the selection of the theory with recent academic research and/or examples from similar circumstances. 57.38 to >47.25 pts PROFICIENT Applies the appropriate lifespan development theory to support 57.38 / 67.5 pts
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Week 6 Assignment: Case Study Analysis: Adolescence to Emerging Adulthood Criteria Ratings Pts an identified intervention process. 47.25 to >0 pts BASIC Applies a lifespan development theory that does not support the identified intervention process or is inappropriate to the circumstances described. 0 pts NON_PERFORMAN CE Does not apply a lifespan development theory to support an identified intervention process. Comments I think MST is a
Week 6 Assignment: Case Study Analysis: Adolescence to Emerging Adulthood Criteria Ratings Pts good choice here. But probably too soon for Al Anon or AA. Describe the potential impact of individual and cultural differences on development for the current age and context described in the case study. view longer description 65 to >55.25 pts DISTINGUISHED Analyzes the potential impact of individual and cultural differences on development for the current age and context described in the case study, and supports analysis with recent academic research or examples from similar circumstances. 55.25 to >45.5 pts PROFICIENT 65 / 65 pts
Week 6 Assignment: Case Study Analysis: Adolescence to Emerging Adulthood Criteria Ratings Pts Describes the potential impact of individual and cultural differences on development for the current age and context described in the case study. 45.5 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies, but does not describe, the potential impact of individual and cultural differences on development for the current age and context described in the case study. 0 pts NON_PERFORMAN CE
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Week 6 Assignment: Case Study Analysis: Adolescence to Emerging Adulthood Criteria Ratings Pts Does not describe the potential impact of individual and cultural differences on development for the current age and context described in the case study. Comments You covered this well. Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards. view longer description 25 to >21.25 pts DISTINGUISHED Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well suited to the intended audience, supporting assertions, arguments, and conclusions with 25 / 25 pts
Week 6 Assignment: Case Study Analysis: Adolescence to Emerging Adulthood Criteria Ratings Pts relevant, credible, and convincing evidence, while exhibiting strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards. 21.25 to >17.5 pts PROFICIENT Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards. 17.5 to >0 pts BASIC
Week 6 Assignment: Case Study Analysis: Adolescence to Emerging Adulthood Criteria Ratings Pts Conveys purpose, but communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and minimal adherence to applicable writing standards. 0 pts NON_PERFORMAN CE Does not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards. Comments
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Week 6 Assignment: Case Study Analysis: Adolescence to Emerging Adulthood Criteria Ratings Pts Your paper was well written with no errors that I could find. Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. view longer description 25 to >21.25 pts DISTINGUISHED Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing, exhibiting strict and nearly flawless adherence to stylistic conventions, document structure, and source attributions. 21.25 to >17.5 pts PROFICIENT Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. 17.5 to >0 pts 21.25 / 25 pts
Week 6 Assignment: Case Study Analysis: Adolescence to Emerging Adulthood Criteria Ratings Pts BASIC Attempts to apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing but errors detract noticeably from good scholarship. 0 pts NON_PERFORMAN CE Does not apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. Comments Your title page should actually be numbered. Total Points: 226.01