Order ID H2311-01.edited

docx

School

Rehman College of Rehabilitation Science Hayatabad, Peshawar (Dr of Physical Therpay 5 Years) *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

CREATIVE W

Subject

Psychology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by MagistrateSnail3903

Data Governance, Ethics, and Sustainability: Involved in psychological research 1

Abstract This report explores how one can do psychological research in an honest and accountable way. It talks about essential guidelines like getting permission from human beings (informed consent), maintaining things non-public (confidentiality), and ensuring people are secure and treated fairly. It also examines the rules researchers should follow, like honesty and treating everyone equally. The report talks about how we care for records throughout the research technique and the laws that shield human facts. It also shows how our study picks can affect people, the law, and the environment in the long run. It discusses how computer applications make decisions and why ensuring they are honest and transparent is essential. The document ends with what we found out, what we think about it, and what we recommend for destiny studies. It's like a guidebook for doing desirable and thoughtful psychological research. 2

Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Ethical Principles and Issues in Research .................................................................................... 4 2.1 Informed Consent: ................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Confidentiality: ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Participant Well-being: .......................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Power Dynamics: ................................................................................................................... 5 2.5 Transparency: ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.6 Researcher Integrity: .............................................................................................................. 5 2.7 Beneficence and Justice: ........................................................................................................ 6 2.6 Researcher Integrity: .............................................................................................................. 6 2.7 Beneficence and Justice: ........................................................................................................ 6 3. Governance and Regulatory Frameworks ................................................................................... 7 3.1 Data Lifecycle: ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Data Protection and Privacy: ................................................................................................. 8 4. Ethical, Legal, Sustainability, and Social Implications ............................................................... 9 4.1 Ethical Implications: .............................................................................................................. 9 4.2 Legal Implications: ................................................................................................................ 9 4.3 Sustainability Challenges: ................................................................................................... 10 5. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Algorithmic Decision-Making ........................ 11 5.1 Interplay of Factors: ............................................................................................................. 11 5.2 Solutions: ............................................................................................................................. 12 5.3 Inclusivity in Algorithmic Design: ...................................................................................... 13 3

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

5.4 Continuous Ethical Training and Education: ....................................................................... 13 6. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 14 6.1 Findings: .............................................................................................................................. 14 6.2 Reflection: ............................................................................................................................ 15 6.3 Recommendations: .............................................................................................................. 16 References ...................................................................................................................................... 17 4

Group Report 1. Introduction Ethical considerations are essential to ensure that psychological research is carried out with respect, accountability, and fairness. Ethical practices are essential in this sector since they protect the rights and well-being of study participants. These ethical issues will be investigated and scrutinized through the prism of the selected condition, which is the focal point of this analysis. Maintaining the integrity of the studies and building credibility and confidence within the scientific community and society at large depend on understanding the ethical aspects of psychological research. This analysis's main objective is to dissect and appreciate the governing frameworks that direct the direction of moral psychology research [1]. The goal is to explore how data is managed at different phases of its lifetime by exploring these frameworks. Furthermore, the investigation aims to decipher the basic principles that preserve privacy and data security in socio-technical contexts. Beyond these fundamental elements, the analysis expands to include the moral ramifications of using data-driven tools in psychological research. This includes carefully examining the potential effects of these technologies on people as individuals, as communities, and as a whole in society. To promote ethical decision-making, the objectives include tackling sustainability concerns and investigating how fundamental ideas in data governance, ethics, sustainability, and data protection can be implemented globally. Another vital goal is critically investigating how fairness interacts with algorithmic decision- making systems. This means looking into how fairness factors affect algorithmic judgments and comprehending the accountability and transparency frameworks in place [2]. The goals cover a comprehensive analysis of ethical issues related to psychology research, including governance frameworks, the moral implications of new technologies, sustainability issues, and the dynamics of fairness involved in algorithmic decision-making. This thorough investigation aims to provide insightful information about the ethical environment surrounding psychological research and its broader societal ramifications. 5

2. Ethical Principles and Issues in Research 2.1 Informed Consent: Getting informed consent is a fundamental component of ethical conduct in psychology research. This entails investigators providing participants with a thorough explanation of the study's goals, methods, and possible dangers before they decide to participate. The goal of implementing informed consent is to uphold people's autonomy and guarantee that they make deliberate decisions about their engagement that are informed and voluntary [3]. However, it can be challenging to ensure that participants understand all of the fine elements of a study, especially when working with disadvantaged populations or complex research issues. For psychological research to be ethically sound, it must balance giving participants a lot of information without overloading them. 2.2 Confidentiality: Preserving participant anonymity is an ethical need that is essential to protecting privacy. Researchers need to take precautions to safeguard participants' identities and private data. This becomes more careful while dealing with delicate subjects. Careful preparation and adherence to ethical standards are necessary to balance the obligation to protect participants from harm and the demand for transparency [4]. Maintaining participants' trust in the research process while ensuring the validity of research findings requires an understanding of the subtleties surrounding confidentiality. 2.3 Participant Well-being: Researchers have ethical obligations beyond securing consent and protecting participant privacy; they also must put participant welfare first. This involves minimizing any possible psychological or emotional harm that study participants may sustain during or after the study. Strict procedures for ethical reviews are in place to evaluate and reduce these hazards [7]. Throughout the research process, participants' well-being requires constant attention, underscoring the ethical requirement to avoid causing unnecessary discomfort or harm. 6

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

2.4 Power Dynamics: Critical evaluation is required due to the power dynamics in the participant-researcher relationship. Researchers have a sway over individuals because they are frequently knowledgeable and influential. It is essential to take this dynamic into account in order to avoid exploitation or coercion [9]. Maintaining ethical standards requires making an effort to treat participants fairly and equally. Keeping a polite and moral research atmosphere requires awareness of these power disparities. 2.5 Transparency: An essential component of ethical research reporting and methodology is transparency. It entails being transparent about the entire research process, from data analysis to study design. Transparent reporting promotes trust in the scientific community by enabling the examination and replication of findings [11]. Transparency also means being honest about potential biases and conflicts of interest, which keeps the research process trustworthy and responsible. Adopting transparency upholds ethical standards and enhances the legitimacy of psychological research. 2.6 Researcher Integrity: In psychological research, upholding the researcher's integrity is a crucial ethical consideration. Throughout the study process, researchers are required to uphold strict criteria of objectivity, accuracy, and honesty. This entails accurately summarising their credentials, methodologies, and conclusions. Intentional or unintentional misrepresentation can undermine public confidence in the scientific community [8]. Maintaining integrity requires researchers to recognize their mistakes and take immediate corrective action, creating a culture where the search for knowledge is morally driven. 2.7 Beneficence and Justice: The concepts of beneficence and justice emphasize the ethical requirement to optimize benefits and share them equitably among study participants and society. To be benevolent, a study must produce meaningful insights that advance scientific understanding or improve the welfare of participants. Researchers must balance risks and potential rewards in an effort to reduce adverse 7

effects and increase favorable results. Conversely, justice necessitates an equitable division of the costs and rewards associated with research. This entails considering diversity when choosing participants, avoiding abusing disadvantaged groups, and ensuring that the advantages of the study are distributed fairly. 2.6 Researcher Integrity: The validity and dependability of psychological research primarily depend on the researchers' ethical integrity. Researchers must conduct their research with integrity, openness, and precision [12]. This entails accurately summarising their credentials, study approaches, and conclusions. The integrity principles are broken by any misbehavior, including fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. Researchers must maintain transparency on any potential conflicts of interest that can jeopardize the objectivity of their research. Maintaining the integrity of researchers adds to the scientific community's general reputation and guarantees the validity of individual investigations. 2.7 Beneficence and Justice: Researchers maximize advantages and distribute them somewhat under the ethical tenets of goodwill and fairness. In order to be considered kind, researchers must make sure that their work advances scientific understanding or improves the welfare of participants. This entails carefully balancing the research's possible advantages and disadvantages. Preventing harm and optimizing benefits must be the top priorities for researchers. Conversely, justice places emphasis on equitable allocation of the costs and rewards associated with research [10]. This entails taking diversity into account when choosing participants, avoiding abusing disadvantaged groups, and ensuring that research advantages are distributed fairly and justly. The ethics of psychology research includes the values of goodwill, fairness, and the researcher's integrity. Respecting these values promotes a research environment based on ethical responsibility and justice while enhancing research findings' validity and societal worth. An all- encompassing ethical approach in psychological research endeavors is ensured by balancing these issues with the ethical norms that were previously outlined. 8

3. Governance and Regulatory Frameworks 3.1 Data Lifecycle: Understanding the governance and regulatory frameworks at each significant data lifecycle stage requires understanding the dynamic path that data takes from creation to disposal. Ethical principles demand that data sources be documented at the outset of data collection to ensure transparency for stakeholders [5]. At this point, governance frameworks usually include defining access protocols, assigning accountable custodianship, and specifying the uses for which data will be used. Data processing and storage steps become more apparent as the data moves through its lifecycle. Strong security measures are necessary for governance during these stages to prevent unwanted access or data breaches. Regulatory frameworks frequently require encryption and access controls to safeguard the integrity and confidentiality of data. Furthermore, ethical considerations stress the significance of data dependability and accuracy, pushing researchers to verify and preserve the caliber of information that has been stored. Data distribution and sharing represent yet another pivotal point in the lifecycle. Data sharing must comply with participant permission and confidentiality rules, according to ethical criteria. Regulations may specify de-identification or anonymization procedures in order to safeguard people's privacy when sharing data [13]. Researchers must be transparent about their data- sharing policies and any possible repercussions for participants. Lastly, data archiving or secure disposal is part of the end-of-life stage. In order to reduce privacy hazards, ethical considerations at this point entail permanently deleting or de-identifying personally identifiable information. Regulatory frameworks can specify safe ways to destroy data and set time limits for data-keeping. Comprehending and following these governance principles over the whole data lifecycle is essential to responsible data handling. 3.2 Data Protection and Privacy: Examining the core values and legal frameworks about privacy and data protection in socio- technical contexts reveals the complex interplay between maximizing the benefits of data and 9

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

preserving individual liberties. The fair and legal handling of personal data is at the core of data protection principles. This means ensuring that information is gathered for defined, acceptable uses and not put to dangerous uses that could endanger people. Policies and rules, like those about data protection, are crucial in forming these ideas. Regulations might, for example, require express consent before processing sensitive personal data. Complying with and comprehending these regulations are fundamental elements of ethical data practices [6]. People usually have rights over their data as well, such as the ability to see, update, or even remove their personal data. Ethical considerations become more pressing in socio-technical situations where there is a strong interaction between social systems and technological breakthroughs [14]. Data protection rules must be followed to responsibly exploit developing technologies like machine learning and artificial intelligence. People must be informed about the automated decision-making processes that could affect them, which makes transparency essential. Moreover, securing privacy in socio-technical environments requires robust security mechanisms. Encryption, safe data storage, and access controls are essential to stop unwanted access or data breaches. Limiting data collection to what is strictly essential for research objectives is crucial to minimize potential privacy infringements, as ethical considerations highlight. To ensure moral and responsible data management, governance and legal frameworks related to data lifecycle and protection principles are essential. Following these standards protects privacy and individual rights while enhancing psychological research's reliability and integrity [16]. Researchers must proactively incorporate ethical data practices into their research methodology and keep up with the constantly changing legal landscape. 4. Ethical, Legal, Sustainability, and Social Implications 4.1 Ethical Implications: Navigating the changing terrain of scientific inquiry requires assessing the ethical implications of using data-driven technology in psychological research. Big data analytics and machine learning 10

algorithms are two examples of data-driven technologies that provide previously unheard-of insights but also raise ethical questions. The possibility of biases in algorithmic decision-making is an essential factor to consider [18]. These prejudices can affect the justice and equity of study findings by sustaining and aggravating already-existing disparities. Ethical evaluation requires careful examination of the algorithms to ensure they don't unintentionally bias against specific demographics. The explainability and transparency of these technologies raise further ethical questions. Algorithm complexity can make it difficult to see how decisions are made, which makes it harder for researchers to comprehend and interpret the findings [15]. In psychological research, transparency is crucial to preserving accountability and public trust. Furthermore, participants must give their informed consent, realizing the potential impact of sophisticated analytics on their rights and privacy, in order for data-driven technologies to be used ethically. One of the most important ethical considerations is the responsible management of sensitive data. Psychologists must maintain strict confidentiality protocols because their work frequently involves sensitive and personal data. A balance between gaining valuable insights from data and protecting participants' privacy is required by ethical rules. In the age of data-driven technology, protecting individuals' privacy and putting strong security measures in place have become moral requirements. 4.2 Legal Implications: An additional layer to the ethical framework is added by looking at the legal considerations surrounding the usage of data and technological applications. Legal frameworks, such as those about intellectual property and data protection, are essential in establishing the parameters of acceptable data use in psychological research [17]. Researchers are required by law to get participants' explicit agreement, notify them of data processing, and preserve their right to personal information. Examples of data protection legislation include the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) [20]. Ensuring that research practices comply with legal standards is crucial, as non-compliance with these regulations may lead to legal consequences. 11

Research utilizing data-driven technologies raises intellectual property issues. To comprehend ownership rights, licensing terms, and potential limitations on the use of particular datasets, researchers must traverse the legal environment. Adhering to intellectual property rules shields researchers from lawsuits and fosters an equitable and cooperative research environment. 4.3 Sustainability Challenges: Psychology research's influence on the environment and society is acknowledged by using fundamental ideas to tackle sustainability issues in a global setting. Data-driven technology's digital nature poses new sustainability problems in energy use, electronic waste, and the carbon footprint of computer infrastructure. Adopting sustainable data practices, such as energy-efficient algorithm optimization and the use of environmentally friendly data storage options, is one way to address these issues [19]. By adopting open science practices, encouraging the sharing of research data, and minimizing the need for duplicate data collecting, researchers can help promote sustainability. Furthermore, sustainability in a global setting includes social and economic aspects and environmental ones. Promoting inclusivity and diversity, avoiding the exploitation of vulnerable people, and making sure that research has a beneficial impact on society's well-being are all part of ethical and sustainable decision-making in psychological research. In order to promote moral and responsible research practices that are in line with more general world objectives, these sustainability challenges must be acknowledged and addressed. 5. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Algorithmic Decision- Making 5.1 Interplay of Factors: Evaluating the intricate interactions among accountability, transparency, and fairness in algorithmic decision-making systems sheds light on the complex dynamics influencing the ethical environment of contemporary research. Fairness is an essential component of moral decision-making, which requires algorithmic systems to handle everyone equally, regardless of 12

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

their upbringing or traits [21]. On the other hand, establishing impartiality is problematic because these algorithms are trained on potentially biased data. Unfair results might arise from the interaction between the data used to train algorithms and their design, which can unintentionally reinforce societal prejudices. Furthermore, accountability is necessary to guarantee that those making decisions are held accountable for the outcomes of algorithmic decisions. This responsibility includes the companies that use the algorithms as well as the people who created them [24]. In order to address the ethical implications of any biases or errors, it is imperative to comprehend who is ultimately responsible for the decisions made by algorithms. Accountability measures must be in place to address unintended repercussions and draw conclusions from algorithmic decision- making processes. Fairness and accountability are enhanced via transparency, which provides insight into the algorithms' decision-making procedures. To enable academics and the general public to examine and explain the elements impacting results closely, transparency entails making the algorithms and their decision logic comprehensible and interpretable [23]. Nevertheless, providing transparency in complex algorithms can be challenging, mainly when working with machine learning models with complicated topologies. Determining the appropriate balance between openness and the requirement to safeguard confidential data is an ongoing obstacle in the moral use of algorithmic systems. The interaction of these variables is especially noticeable when one considers how algorithmic decision-making is used in real-world settings like hiring, criminal justice, and healthcare. While biased algorithms in criminal justice systems might disproportionately harm specific demographic groups, biases in recruiting algorithms can reinforce existing racial or gender imbalances. Algorithmic judgments in healthcare have the ability to impact treatment plans and resource allocation, giving rise to ethical concerns regarding equity and potential biases in patient outcomes. 5.2 Solutions: Assessing technological and operational solutions to algorithmic decision-making fairness issues requires a multipronged strategy to reduce biases and improve the moral behavior of these 13

systems. Operational solutions start with a dedication to inclusivity and diversity during the stages of design and execution [22]. Different teams with various viewpoints can find and fix algorithm biases, promoting fairness from the start. Algorithmic audits are an essential operational solution; think of them as routine check-ups. These audits entail ongoing algorithmic system evaluation and monitoring to spot and fix biases or mistakes. Independent oversight or regulatory agencies should be established to improve accountability even more and guarantee that fairness issues are taken into account consistently . Technical solutions focus on improving algorithmic decision-making systems' openness and fairness. Algorithms that consider fairness include steps to reduce prejudice and guarantee just results. Reweighting training data and modifying decision thresholds are two strategies used to combat biased trends in the data [25]. Adopting interpretable machine learning models also promotes transparency by making decision-making processes transparent to stakeholders. Providing diverse and high-quality data is another essential technical answer to fairness issues. Frequently, biases originate from past data that might not accurately reflect the many populations impacted by algorithmic choices. Fairer algorithmic results are achieved by actively attempting to diversify training datasets and using strategies to lessen bias in data inputs. A subset of technical solutions known as explainability tools offer insights into how sophisticated algorithms make decisions. These tools make it easier to grasp some algorithms' "black box" characters without jeopardizing confidential data. Technologies that improve transparency, such as explainability tools, help people have more faith in algorithmic systems. 5.3 Inclusivity in Algorithmic Design: It becomes clear that integrating inclusion into algorithmic design is essential to promoting justice in decision-making procedures. In order to do this, possible biases resulting from underrepresented or marginalized groups in the data used to train algorithms must be recognized and addressed. Throughout the design process, actively seeking out different viewpoints can aid in spotting and correcting biases that could otherwise go overlooked. Historical disparities are 14

less likely to be repeated when algorithmic systems are inclusive and representative of the whole range of human diversity. This leads to more egalitarian outcomes. An inclusive design approach ensures that people from different demographic groups are actively involved in the design process and consider how algorithmic decisions may affect them. For instance, to prevent biased results in healthcare algorithms, it is crucial to consider the distinct healthcare requirements of various demographic groups [26]. Similarly, taking into account a range of learning styles and cultural backgrounds in educational algorithms can help ensure equitable and inclusive decision-making. Furthermore, maintaining contact with impacted populations is necessary to promote inclusion in algorithmic design. This entails getting input, being aware of cultural quirks, and combining different viewpoints while designing and assessing algorithms [29]. Working with community stakeholders can promote a more inclusive and moral approach to algorithmic decision-making by identifying potential biases or unexpected consequences. 5.4 Continuous Ethical Training and Education: Encouraging ethical education and training is essential to addressing fairness issues in algorithmic decision-making. Promoting ethical practices requires ensuring everyone working on algorithm design, development, and deployment knows ethical issues. A wide range of subjects can be covered in training programs, such as identifying and mitigating bias, improving transparency, and the effects of algorithmic judgments on society. Ethical training programs should go beyond the technical to include a deeper comprehension of the moral and social ramifications of algorithmic systems. This entails learning about the background of biases, appreciating the wider societal ramifications of algorithmic decisions, and comprehending the possible repercussions of biased decision-making [27]. Furthermore, using case studies and actual situations might offer helpful insights into the moral dilemmas raised by algorithmic decision-making. Maintaining current knowledge of changing ethical standards, legal requirements, and industry best practices is another aspect of continuous education. With the speed at which technology is 15

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

developing and the fluidity of ethical issues, continuing education is necessary to guarantee that professionals are prepared to handle new obstacles and reach morally sound conclusions. Organizations can foster a culture of ethical responsibility by including ongoing ethical training in the professional development of those who make algorithmic decisions. By taking a proactive stance, unintentional biases can be avoided, and justice, accountability, and transparency are kept at the forefront of algorithmic design and implementation. 6. Conclusions 6.1 Findings: It is clear from a summary of the analysis's main conclusions that ethical issues are crucial to psychological research's whole lifecycle. Upholding ethical standards is crucial at every stage, from getting informed consent to disposing of data at the end. The interaction of accountability, transparency, and justice in algorithmic decision-making systems became a key topic, emphasizing the necessity of rigorous assessment and ongoing development in this quickly evolving technological environment. The examination demonstrated how intricate ethical guidelines are in psychological research, especially when it comes to the application of data-driven technologies. It takes constant attention to address issues with getting fully informed consent, protecting participant privacy, and guaranteeing their well-being. Furthermore, the legislative and governance frameworks pertaining to data management emphasize how important it is to match research methods with changing ethical and legal requirements. The results of the investigation into algorithmic decision-making highlighted the need for a careful balancing act between resolving ethical issues and maximizing the possibilities of data- driven technology. Algorithmic biases present substantial obstacles to equity, requiring technical and operational solutions to reduce these biases and improve transparency. Incorporating a range of viewpoints into algorithmic design and providing ongoing ethical education have become essential tactics in promoting equity and responsibility. 16

6.2 Reflection: It is clear from reflecting on the dynamic nature of ethical standards and the growing field of psychology research that ethical issues are not static and must change to keep up with the quick pace of technological breakthroughs and shifting sociocultural contexts. The investigation revealed the complex moral problems that data-driven technologies raise, underscoring the necessity of taking preventative measures to deal with new issues. Because ethical principles are dynamic, they require constant thought and modification. Ethical issues need to be prioritized when new technologies and methods for psychological research develop. Recognizing the possible shortcomings of the ethical frameworks in place presently and actively working towards improvements are steps in the reflection process. To make sure that ethical standards develop in step with technology breakthroughs, researchers, ethicists, and regulatory agencies must work together on an iterative path. Furthermore, the examination emphasized the interrelatedness of ethical, legal, sustainable, and social factors. The dynamic nature of psychological research necessitates a comprehensive strategy that takes into account the broader societal and environmental effects in addition to the immediate ethical ramifications. This thought asks for a thorough comprehension of the moral implications of data-driven technology and a dedication to moral decision-making beyond isolated investigations. 6.3 Recommendations: Integrating the most critical findings from the study into suggestions for promoting moral and long-lasting methods in psychological research is part of the process. First and foremost, to guarantee that all parties engaged in psychological research—from data collectors to algorithm developers—have the information and abilities necessary to handle ethical dilemmas, researchers must prioritize ongoing education and training on these topics [28]. Adopting inclusive design principles should also be a fundamental component of moral behavior. Fair and equitable research outputs are facilitated by actively incorporating multiple viewpoints, soliciting community feedback, and considering the potential impact on marginalized groups 17

during the design phase. This inclusiveness also applies to algorithmic decision-making, where biases should be addressed, and the technology should benefit all facets of society. Moreover, it is imperative to incorporate sustainability ideas into research methodologies. Researchers need to consider how data-driven technology may affect the environment and work toward implementing sustainable data practices. This entails reducing energy use, decreasing electronic waste, and encouraging open science to reduce needless data collection. The guidelines highlight the necessity of a multifaceted strategy for moral and long-term conduct in psychological research. Fairness, accountability, and openness are at the forefront of a research environment that is fostered by ongoing education, inclusive design, and sustainability concerns. The discipline of psychology research can successfully negotiate the challenges of the changing ethical landscape and enhance the welfare of society by following these guidelines. 18

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

References [1] Felix C Aguboshim, Ifeyinwa N Obiokafor, and Anastasia O Emenike, “Sustainable Data Governance in the ERA of Global Data Security Challenges in Nigeria: A narrative review,” World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews , vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 378–385, 2023. doi:10.30574/wjarr.2023.17.2.0154 [2] B. Aysolmaz, R. Müller, and D. Meacham, “The public perceptions of algorithmic decision- making systems: Results from a large-scale survey,” Telematics and Informatics , vol. 79, p. 101954, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2023.101954 [3] N. Banwell and N. Eggert, “Rethinking ecoanxiety through environmental moral distress: An ethics reflection,” The Journal of Climate Change and Health , p. 100283, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.joclim.2023.100283 [4] T. Burgess, S. Rennie, and K. Moodley, “Key ethical issues encountered during covid-19 research: A thematic analysis of perspectives from South African Research Ethics Committees,” BMC Medical Ethics , vol. 24, no. 1, 2023. doi:10.1186/s12910-023-00888-y [5] M. Burri, “Cross-border data flows and privacy in Global Trade Law: Has trade trumped data protection?,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy , vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 85–97, 2023. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grac042 [6] E. P. Byrne, “The Evolving Engineer; professional accreditation sustainability criteria and societal imperatives and norms,” Education for Chemical Engineers , vol. 43, pp. 23–30, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.ece.2023.01.004 [7] H. Choung, P. David, and A. Ross, “Trust and ethics in ai,” AI & SOCIETY , vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 733–745, 2022. doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01473-4 [8] S. Divadari, J. Surya Prasad, and P. Honnavalli, “Managing Data Protection and Privacy on Cloud,” Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems , pp. 383–396, 2023. doi:10.1007/978-981- 19-6088-8_33 [9] M.-J. Drolet, E. Rose-Derouin, J.-C. Leblanc, M. Ruest, and B. Williams-Jones, “Ethical issues in research: Perceptions of researchers, Research Ethics Board members and Research Ethics Experts,” Journal of Academic Ethics , vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 269–292, 2022. doi:10.1007/s10805-022-09455-3 [10] M. S. Goodman, K. A. Pierce, J. M. DuBois, and V. S. Thompson, “Data Decisions and Ethics: The case of stakeholder-engaged research,” Philosophy and Medicine , pp. 219– 244, 2023. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-40379-8_16 19

[11] K. Imai and Z. Jiang, “Principal fairness for human and algorithmic decision-making,” Statistical Science , vol. 38, no. 2, 2023. doi:10.1214/22-sts872 [12] Y.-Y. Jhuang, Y.-H. Yan, and G.-J. Horng, “GDPR Personal Privacy Security Mechanism for Smart Home System,” Electronics , vol. 12, no. 4, p. 831, 2023. doi:10.3390/electronics12040831 [13] G. Jiang, X. Cai, X. Feng, and W. Liu, “Effect of data environment and cognitive ability on participants’ attitude towards Data Governance,” Journal of Information Science , vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 740–761, 2021. doi:10.1177/01655515211019000 [14] S. M. Kabanda et al. , “Data Sharing and data governance in sub-Saharan africa: Perspectives from researchers and scientists engaged in data-intensive research,” South African Journal of Science , vol. 119, no. 5/6, 2023. doi:10.17159/sajs.2023/15129 [15] S. Kamaruddin et al. , “Compliance to GDPR data protection and privacy in Artificial Intelligence Technology: Legal and Ethical Ramifications in Malaysia,” 2023 International Conference on Disruptive Technologies (ICDT) , 2023. doi:10.1109/icdt57929.2023.10150615 [16] T. Krawchenko and C. McDonald, “Rendering the invisible visible,” The Significance of Sámi Rights , pp. 152–165, 2023. doi:10.4324/9781003220640-11 [17] Data Protection and Privacy, volume 15 , 2023. doi:10.5040/9781509965939 [18] B. Mazur, A. Walczyna, and M. Cichorzewska, “The place of the natural environment in activities for social responsibility in the opinion of students of Electrical Engineering,” Sustainability , vol. 15, no. 2, p. 1306, 2023. doi:10.3390/su15021306 [19] A. Nguyen, H. N. Ngo, Y. Hong, B. Dang, and B.-P. T. Nguyen, “Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education,” Education and Information Technologies , vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4221–4241, 2022. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w [20] P. L. Altman, “Collection, analysis and publication of Biological Data,” Communication of Scientific Information , pp. 140–148. doi:10.1159/000398080 [21] G. Samuel and C. Richie, “Reimagining research ethics to include environmental sustainability: A principled approach, including a case study of data-driven health research,” Journal of Medical Ethics , vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 428–433, 2022. doi:10.1136/jme- 2022-108489 [22] G. Samuel and C. Richie, “Reimagining research ethics to include environmental sustainability: A principled approach, including a case study of data-driven health research,” Journal of Medical Ethics , vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 428–433, 2022. doi:10.1136/jme- 2022-108489 20

[23] T. Schmude, L. Koesten, T. Möller, and S. Tschiatschek, “On the impact of explanations on understanding of algorithmic decision-making,” 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2023. doi:10.1145/3593013.3594054 [24] N. Shiri and V. Jafari‐Sadeghi, “Corporate Social Responsibility and green behaviour: Towards sustainable food‐business development,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 605–620, 2022. doi:10.1002/csr.2377 [25] K. Singh, I. Jahnke, A. Mosa, and P. Calyam, “The winding road of requesting healthcare data for analytics purposes: Using the one-interview mental model method for improving services of health data governance and Big Data Request Processes,” Journal of Business Analytics , vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2021. doi:10.1080/2573234x.2021.1992305 [26] V. Zimmermann, “Smart cities as a testbed for experimenting with humans? - applying psychological ethical guidelines to Smart City Interventions,” Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 25, no. 4, 2023. doi:10.1007/s10676-023-09729-3 [27] A. Harkens, “Fairness in algorithmic decision-making,” Amicus Curiae, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 84–96, 2019. doi:10.14296/ac.v1i1.5067 [28] G. Wang, Y. Guo, W. Zhang, S. Xie, and Q. Chen, “What type of algorithm is perceived as fairer and more acceptable? A comparative analysis of rule-driven versus data-driven algorithmic decision-making in Public Affairs,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 2, p. 101803, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101803 [29] B. Trump, C. Cummings, K. Klasa, S. Galaitsi, and I. Linkov, “Governing Biotechnology to provide safety and security and address ethical, legal, and Social Implications,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 13, 2023. doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.1052371 21

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Order ID H2311-01.edited

Related Documents