Atwood Machine Lab Report

pdf

School

Stony Brook University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

133

Subject

Physics

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

7

Uploaded by jakestearns301

Report
Stony Brook University Department of Physics and Astronomy PHY 133 L08 Atwood Lab Jake Stearns Lab partner: Robert Kulesza, Ahmed Abbasi TA: Mathieu Boisvert Experiment Date: 1 March 2023 Report Date: 7 March 2023
Introduction The purpose of this lab like many of the other labs we’ve done is to observe Newton’s Second Law of Motion (a force to be equal to the change in momentum per change in time). In the case of this experiment, we used two pairs of increasingly heavier pairs of weights connected to each other on a string that was connected by a pulley system. The wheel at the top of the pulley system had evenly spaced gaps in between each solid part of the wheel that the photogate used to calculate the speed of the system. In this lab, we are mainly measuring the acceleration of each variation of weights used. At the end of the experiment we use our data to once again calculate the value of g, which is the acceleration of gravity on earth. We expected to find that our value of g within uncertainty was the same as the real value of g (9.81m/s^2), and we expected as the weights increased that the acceleration would decrease.
Theory “Theoretical Relationship” shows the representation between the equation for a y and T: and the same values using λ: The value of λ simply represents m2/m1. An example of a value for a y would be 2.4525 using the (m1-m2)/(m1+m2) value from trial one (0.2), and an example of T using the (m1-m2)/(m1+m2) from trial one (0.2), is 3.924. The point of the two pairs of equations in “Theoretical Relationship” is to prove that using both equations you would get the same answer, the second equation is altered and includes λ. Limiting Cases: If both masses were equal, (for example 50g) the acceleration would be equal to zero and the weights would not move. T will be 490.5. If m1 was much bigger than m2 (for
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
example m1=1000 and m2=5) the acceleration would be 58.81. With these same values, T would be 97.62. Data Quantity Mass 1 Mass 2 (m1-m2)/(m1+m2) Acceleration 1 Acceleration 2 Acceleration 3 Avg. Accel. Uncertainty Unit g g g m/s^2 m/s^2 m/s^2 m/s^2 m/s^2 Trial 1 50 30 0.25 2.359 2.354 2.37 2.361 0.00472581563 Trial 2 60 40 0.2 1.921 1.922 1.926 1.923 0.00152752523 Trial 3 70 50 0.166 1.524 1.586 1.589 1.566 0.02118568699 Trial 4 80 60 0.143 1.337 1.346 1.303 1.329 0.01309580085 Trial 5 100 80 0.111 1.076 1.076 1.08 1.077 0.0013540064 Quantity g Unit Value 9.46086 Uncertainty 0.364644 Calculations The calculations that we conducted in this lab consist of computer-made and human-made calculations. The computer used the photogate to calculate the acceleration for each trail
and calculated g, and the only three types of calculations we did were calculating the (m1-m2)/(m1+m2) value, the average acceleration of each trial, and finding the uncertainty of that acceleration. To calculate the (m1-m2)/(m1+m2) value, we used that exact equation, m1 being the mass of the heavier weight and m2 being the mass of the lighter weight. To calculate the average acceleration of each trial, we added the three accelerations and divided them by 3. The equation used would look like (a1+a2+a3)/3. Finally, to calculate the uncertainty of the average acceleration we used the uncertainty in the average of several measurements formula: Results
The value of g (9.46086) with the uncertainty of 0.364644 agrees with the expected value of 9.81, which is the acceleration due to gravity on earth. This means that our expectations for the lab were met and we successfully calculated the real value of g ourselves. Conclusion In conclusion, our expectations for the experiment were met because first, our value of g agreed with the real value of g, and our hypothesis of the acceleration slowing down as the weight
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
increased was also proved to be correct Our data was consistent throughout the experiment and our calculations matched our data. Overall the lab was a success because we were able to find answers to our questions, acquire all necessary data, and observe Newton’s Second Law. 4