Article 4 - Week 7
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of British Columbia *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
103
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
Pages
5
Uploaded by SuperHumanChinchillaMaster526
Article 4: Bedat in the Business of Fashion
"Only Government Can Make Fashion Sustainable" by Maxine Bédat
What is the argument being made? List 2-3 key points made in the Op Ed
Argument:
In this opinion piece, it is posited that the predicaments surrounding sustainability within the fashion sector cannot be effectively resolved solely by consumers or companies. The author asserts that governmental intervention and regulatory measures are imperative in order to tackle the challenges posed by collective action and achieve substantial advancements towards sustainability.
Key Points:
1.
Absence of Quantifiable Outcomes: In spite of the growing discourse surrounding sustainability within the realm of fashion, it is contended by the writer that there exists a dearth in terms of tangible achievements. Regrettably, both social and environmental dimensions seem to be veering off course instead of progressing positively.
2.
Critical Role of Government: The op-ed underscores the cruciality of state intervention, asserting that legal measures and policy implementations are the sole efficacious means to surmount the challenge posed by collective action predicaments. Moreover, such interventions serve as a deterrent against descending into an unfavorable scenario and ensure fair competition among all parties involved.
3.
Proposed Legislative Measures:
-
Clear and Transparent Accounting: The writer firmly advocates for the adoption of rules that enforce standardized and easily understandable practices in disclosing environmental information, thus ensuring a consistent framework applicable to all entities.
-
Target Setting: Businesses are encouraged to adhere to prescribed legal obligations aimed at curbing their emissions and aligning with the objectives outlined in the Paris Agreement. The purpose of these regulations is twofold: firstly, they aim to compel companies to actively minimize their environmental footprint; secondly, they seek to ensure active engagement in global endeavors addressing the pressing issue of climate change.
-
Mandatory Due Diligence: The writer proposes the implementation of additional legal measures that would require companies to recognize, assess, and mitigate adverse outcomes beyond traditional accounting practices and goal establishment. The objective is to foster a more holistic approach towards tackling societal concerns while ensuring adequate legal remedies for individuals impacted by such consequences.
-
Quotas for Racial Justice: Specifically, he suggested that the rules governing mandatory quotas for board seats should be reviewed thoroughly with a specific focus on promoting racial equality.
Why did you find the article compelling?
-
Contrast with Consumer and Corporate Influence: According to this article, consumers' consciousness coupled with corporate endeavors is not sufficient to create substantial changes within the fashion industry. -
Practical Solutions: The op-ed doesn't just highlight the problem but offers specific legislative measures, providing a pragmatic approach to address sustainability concerns.
How is the op-ed structured? What do you like/dislike about this?
-
Introduction: The author introduces her background and experience in fashion sustainability.
-
Current State of the Industry
-
Role of Government
-
Conclusion: Emphasizes the pressing need for decisive governmental measures and highlights the potential beneficial consequences for both humanity and the environment.
-
Dislike: If the government does anything
What evidence does the author use? -
Data Analysis: Ref to Prof. Sarosh Kuruvilla's analysis of factory audits.
-
Industry Group Analysis: Mentioning the Global Fashion Agenda's analysis of the fashion industry's decarbonization initiatives.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
-
Personal Experience: The author's own experiences during travels
What do you think worked and didn’t?
-
Strengths: Clear articulation of the problem, practical legislative proposals, and evidence-
based arguments.
-
Weaknesses: Limited visibility into counterarguments or potential challenges to proposed legislative measures.
What solution(s) does the article propose for fast fashion?
-
Government Legislation: Legislation that introduces concrete benchmarks, requires thorough evaluations, and sets achievable numerical criteria to promote the advancement of racial equity.
What do you think about this? Does it confirm or shift what you thought before?
In this piece, a fresh and ground-breaking perspective is introduced, one that has the capability to revolutionize the ongoing discussion surrounding the responsibility of both consumers and corporations in terms of sustainability. The proposed legal measures are intellectually invigorating and offer an original outlook on how to tackle challenges within various industries. However, I think that interference from the government would increase the price of goods which would cause another problem which is an increase in the cost of living. Since that would make the companies increase the wages in order to improve the workplace to be a better place and more comfortable, they have to pay to
build them causing a rise in goods price. In my opinion, there should be a lot of thoughts behind that action that is going to be done