Final Essay
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Eastern Gateway Community College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
200
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by skyysays
Ethics Final Essay
Skylund Higgins
PHI202
03/02/2024
The Chronus Department of the Federal Government has been tasked with the important responsibility of hiring a new Director who will be responsible for leading the team. The ideal candidate would have a humanities degree with a focus on research, history, and culture. In addition to academic qualifications, the candidate must possess exceptional leadership abilities and be capable of working collaboratively with a range of individuals.
Following a thorough selection process, the department has identified two promising candidates for the position. The first candidate, Molly, is an accomplished African American woman hailing from an affluent and politically engaged background. She boasts a degree in Anthropology and possesses a wealth of experience in the realm of politics. A proven leader with
exceptional communication abilities, Molly has demonstrated her proficiency in working collaboratively with individuals from various backgrounds.
Our next candidate is Cameron, a proud third-generation Irish American hailing from a hard-working family. With a degree in US History and a successful stint as Student Body President, Cameron has exhibited impressive leadership qualities. Moreover, he holds a deep-
seated belief in the importance of diversity and inclusivity. Cameron's strong work ethic and unwavering dedication to achieving excellence make him a valuable addition to any team.Overall, both candidates possess impressive qualifications and unique strengths that make them ideal for the position of Director.
In order to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the case at hand, it is crucial to delve into
the philosophical viewpoints of the two assigned philosophers, Pojman and Mosley. Pojman, in his excerpts on "Affirmative Action: Con," presents a strong argument against affirmative action and advocates for a meritocratic approach. According to Pojman, individuals should be selected for employment or admission to institutions solely on the basis of their qualifications and
abilities, without any consideration of their race or ethnicity. Pojman asserts that affirmative action undermines fairness and equality and instead creates an environment that treats individuals unequally based on their race. His argument highlights the importance of considering
the merits of an individual's qualifications over their personal characteristics, such as race and ethnicity.
In his written pieces titled "Affirmative Action: Pro," Mosley puts forth a viewpoint in favor of affirmative action as a method to rectify past injustices and foster diversity. Mosley asserts that affirmative action can be instrumental in providing equal opportunities for marginalized communities and overcoming entrenched societal inequalities. He advocates for the
inclusion of factors such as race and ethnicity in the hiring process to ensure equitable representation and amplify diversity in leadership roles. Mosley's perspective is founded on the conviction that affirmative action can function as a potent mechanism to even the odds and establish a more all-encompassing society.
According to philosopher Louis Pojman, the ideal candidate for the job should be chosen based on their qualifications and abilities without regard for their race or background. Considering this specific case, Pojman would likely perceive Cameron, possessing a US History degree and having experience as Student Body President, as the most competent candidate based on merit. Pojman would defend this selection by highlighting the importance of fairness and equal treatment, maintaining that choosing Cameron is consistent with the objective of hiring based solely on qualifications, which is crucial for ensuring a fair and just society.In light of the case in question, philosopher Louis Pojman would argue that the most deserving candidate for the job should be selected based on their qualifications and abilities, regardless of their race or background. In this particular scenario, Pojman would likely view Cameron, with his degree in
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
US History and experience as Student Body President, as the more qualified candidate based on meritocracy. Pojman would justify this decision by emphasizing the principle of fairness and equal treatment, asserting that selecting Cameron aligns with the goal of hiring based on qualifications alone, and that this practice is essential for maintaining a just and equitable society.
On the other hand, Mosley puts forth a compelling case that Molly's African American heritage could prove beneficial to the department. By promoting diversity and representing a group that has been historically marginalized, Mosley highlights the significance of considering Molly's race and personal background in addressing past injustices and creating equal opportunities for all. Additionally, Mosley emphasizes that Molly's education in Anthropology and her experience with the Peace Corps would bring valuable contributions to the department's focus on research, history, and culture. Therefore, Mosley advocates for selecting Molly as a way
of fostering inclusivity and diversity, which aligns with the principles of affirmative action.
To determine which philosopher provides a more efficient resolution to the case, it is essential to establish the standards that define a successful solution. In this scenario, a successful solution would demonstrate the department's competence in investigating the way previous incidents impact present circumstances. Moreover, it should create an atmosphere that promotes inclusivity, diversity, and impartiality, where everyone is treated fairly and without bias. By achieving these goals, the department can ensure that its actions are guided by ethical principles and contribute to building a just and equitable society.
Mosley's perspective appears to be more closely aligned with the department's goals. This
is due to the fact that Molly, who was chosen by the department, holds a degree in Anthropology and has extensive experience working with the Peace Corps. Additionally, her African American identity allows her to provide a distinctive viewpoint and comprehension of how past events can
impact present-day concerns. This type of understanding is extremely valuable for the department's mission, which centers on promoting inclusivity and addressing historical injustices. By prioritizing these goals, the department can more effectively achieve its objectives.
Upon thorough examination of the case, careful analysis of the theories presented by Pojman and Mosley, and taking into consideration the objectives of the Chronus Department, I have made the determination that Molly is the epitome of a perfect candidate for the position. Her background, qualifications, and experiences are an exact match for the department's research
focus on history and culture, making her an excellent fit. Additionally, her unique perspective as an African American woman would add valuable diversity to the team, and her involvement in politics and affluence indicate potential for leadership roles within the department. With Molly's expertise and contribution, the department can actively work towards its long-term goal of promoting inclusivity and addressing historical injustices. This aligns perfectly with Mosley's affirmative action theory, which emphasizes equal opportunities and diversity as key factors in creating more successful solutions.