Affirmative Action Case Analysis

docx

School

Black Hawk College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

202

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Oct 30, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by ProfessorFerretMaster926

Affirmative Action Case Analysis 1 Fay Mattson Eastern Gateway Community College Ethics - PHI202_1001 Affirmative Action Case Analysis September 30 th , 2023

Affirmative Action Case Analysis 2 In accordance with Pojman's idea, morally upright behavior entails doing whatever will make the most people happy, based on the utilitarian principle. In other words, the morally just action is the one that maximizes advantage. According to the deontological principle, a morally right action is one that adheres to the morally correct rules, regardless of the consequences. This is Mosley's position. Thus, Poman's theory indicates that in the situation where Molly and Cameron are competing for a position at the Chronus Department, it is morally right to pick the candidate who will provide the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest number of people. Molly would qualify in this situation since she comes from a prosperous family and has traveled and experienced various cultures. The working-class Cameron is less accustomed to diverse cultures, whereas she has a strong educational background and a reputation for getting along well with others. Furthermore, he has less knowledge and less evidence that he can build a positive relationship with others than he does. The morally correct course of action is to support a politician who defends morally virtuous ideas, regardless of the consequences, according to Mosley. Cameron is that person. Although he lacks Molly's education or experience, he has demonstrated his commitment to social justice. In choosing a candidate, the Department must consider which ideas are most important to it as well as which skills they possess. Molly would be Pojman's preference for the role because she is most likely to bring happiness to the most people. As a candidate who upholds morally decent principles regardless of the outcome, Mosley would pick Cameron for the position. In choosing a candidate, the Department must consider which ideas are most important to it as well as which skills they possess.

Affirmative Action Case Analysis 3 Due to her wealth, Molly has been able to travel around the world and see a wide variety of cultures. Pojman's theory is more useful here because it takes the joy of the largest amount of people into account. In addition to her strong educational background, she has a good reputation for getting along well with others. Cameron, however, is less accustomed to diverse cultures since he comes from a working-class family. Aside from this, he has less knowledge and evidence that he can establish a good relationship with others. Mosley's approach is less useful in this instance because it disregards the enjoyment of that considerable number of people. While Molly does have more training and previous experience, Cameron has shown a commitment to social justice and leader like abilities. However, the upbringing and lack of experience may make it difficult for him to fully understand the Chronus Department's difficulties. Considering the greatest number of people's enjoyment makes Poman's approach more useful in this case. In Pojman's argument, most happiness is produced by the morally good actions that benefit the greatest number of people. This principle is known as the utilitarian principle. According to another way of putting it, a morally right course of action maximizes benefit. The theory of Molley, on the other hand, is based on the moral doctrine of deontology, which holds that if one acts in accordance with morally righteous principles, regardless of the outcome, he or she will be considered ethically acceptable. In this case, as Molly and Cameron are competing for the same position at the Chronus Department, Poman's theory implies that the morally correct course of action would be to select the applicant who would result in the biggest amount of happiness for the largest number of everyone else. This suggests that Cameron is the best choice. We are referring to Molly in this instance. Having been raised in a wealthy family, she has traveled around the world and experienced a wide range of cultures. As well as having a solid

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Affirmative Action Case Analysis 4 educational background, she has shown her ability to work effectively with others. The working- class background of Cameron, on the other hand, means he has less exposure to other cultures. Moreover, he lacks education and has not demonstrated strong people skills. Mosley, on the other hand, argues that choosing a candidate whose morally righteous values are compatible with the country's values is the morally righteous action, regardless of its consequences. This is the right thing to do morally. Cameron is the person to whom we are referring in this instance. Although he lacks Molly's level of education and experience, he has shown his ability to lead people and his commitment to social justice. It is then up to the Department to decide which candidate they value most, and what skills best meet their needs. Due to her potential to make the greatest number of people happy, Pojman would choose Molly as his candidate. It is Cameron's responsibility to offer Cameron the job, so Mosley would hire him regardless of the consequences. Because of this, the Department must determine which theory they value most and which application they consider to be most appropriate. Because Pojman's hypothesis considers the pleasure enjoyed by the greatest number of people, it is more relevant to this circumstance than competing hypotheses. Molly's privilege has allowed her to travel and encounter a variety of cultures due to her rich background. Furthermore, she has a strong education and demonstrates strong collaboration skills. However, Cameron comes from a working-class background and is less exposed to other cultures. His educational background is limited, and he has not shown a strong ability to collaborate effectively. The idea of Mosley fails to address the enjoyment of a large number of people in this case, making it less effective than it would have been otherwise. It does not matter that Cameron lacks Molly's education or experience; he has demonstrated his commitment to social justice as well as

Affirmative Action Case Analysis 5 his ability to have a positive impact on others. In contrast, given his lack of experience and his past, it may be difficult for him to fully comprehend the difficulties that Chronus Department is experiencing. According to Poman, this situation is best explained by his theory since it considers the greatest number of people's joy.