Ethical Analyjsis Essay

docx

School

Galen College of Nursing *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

2205

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by benjaminchitenje

Stage One of the Ethical Analysis Essay Benjamin R. Chitenje Applied Ethics - 0123-PHL2205-00022-ONL Dr. James Taylor 03/19/2023

The picture John Q stands out when ethical values for social justice are analyzed since it opposes medical care and, more specifically, distribution of organs due to underutilization. The intention of the film is to highlight the flaw in the managed healthcare system that forces a helpless parent to endanger himself to safeguard his child at the price of the medical staff. Cassavetes, 2020). The inadequacy of resources allocation in the medical sector is exploited in the film to represent a feeling of inadequacy and despair. The main message of this film is that organ donation is a difficult and traumatizing process for the patient's family, in addition to the many moral issues surrounding the distribution of aid that need to be addressed by healthcare providers. It is claimed that an American manufacturing worker had trouble paying for his son's medical care since he was a victim of a poor financial situation. The son suffers from an inflamed coronary heart that went undiagnosed for a long time. The health care administration made it crystal clear that the boy would definitely die without a heart transplant. The client's situation was further compounded by the clinic official's explanation to them that their insurance had changed from a PPO to an HMO type plan and that the transplant surgery was now an optional procedure and no longer covered by their insurance. They were told by the health insurer that the payment would only cover $20,000 of the expected $250,000. Afterwards, John Q decided to take actions on his own and, while holding them both at hostage, ordered the director of the cardiac division to locate the youngster a new heart. He properly views the heart doctor and a number of healthcare staffs and patients as hostages and asked for his son's name be added to the beneficiary list(Cassavetes, 2020). The film suggests that the policy method for organ allocation is easily swayed by the recipient's ability to pay for the procedure and falls short of appropriately considering the patient's on need of the organ basis on his personal life, utility, and right to fair treatment. The example

demonstrates how this pressure and emotional pressure manifest in the impulsive behavior of the father of a terminally sick kid and appears to justify his actions by making reference to the unequal treatment of the organ logistics chain. (Cassavetes, 2020). The movie also causes me to think about trust, one of the six pillars of virtue. However dedicated to their company or organization can a person be? Each member of an organization has a responsibility to defend its moral standards, but when those standards are in danger, members frequently resign from their posts or start to "whistle blow." Whistleblowers are typically included in consequentialism, a pragmatist theory that asserts that we can infer the morality of a behavior using only our intuition. Most of the ill patients in the emergency room hold beliefs that diverge from those at "Hope Memorial Hospital." John and the medical personnel were discussing throughout the patient's stay at the emergency room(Cassavetes, 2020). Immanuel Kant thought that moral virtue comes from having good intentions. It is generosity if it upholds commitments. What needs to be done is what obligation is all about. According to Kant, humans are logical agents with goals and plans. This part of human nature is intended to be protected as well as upheld by Kant's ethical philosophy. As John's son Michael developed a serious illness and needed an urgently heart transplant treatment that neither John could afford nor his healthcare insurance would approve, John was eager to take every step he was necessary to keep his child alive. He frantically grabbed the hostages with every individual in the emergency room, even those who themselves needed medical assistance. To give his son the transplant he needed to survive; dad also nearly gave his life. Kant believed that we should not act unless we are sure that doing so will set an example that everyone else can follow. John was fulfilling his obligation as a parent to his son. To make a maxim into a universal law, he claimed that one must simultaneously put it into practice. The pertinent questions in the case of John are:

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Would all fathers respond impulsively to try save his son's life in the same way that John did? Furthermore, should every father try to sacrifice himself to save his son rather than just kidnapping innocent people? Hence, I believe it does not become universal, and for Kant, if you believe that it would become. The third rule that Kant has is that "you must act in such a way that you always respect humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never only as a means but always at the same time as an aim (Kant, 2022). When John decided to offer his own heart in exchange for his life in order to receive a heart transplant in order to save his child, he essentially saw himself as a way as opposed to a goal. Human agency must never be given up in favor of anything less valuable because everything is of equal or lesser importance (Dimmock & Fisher, 2017). According to my logic, if someone can afford a procedure or has insurance that will cover it, they may be better able to contribute to the market and, consequently, society as a whole. They may also have a higher chance of possessing the intellectual capacity and educational level that are thought to enable them to present the most helpful contributions to the community. By applying that reasoning, it stands to reason to point out that prioritizing those who can afford medical care is in some ways worth their perceived societal utility. The son of John Q. Archibald was refused the transplant that would have extended his life as a result of this conceptualization. The fact that Mr. Archibald was unable to come up with the $250,000 needed for the surgery served as a symbol of his social usefulness while the healthcare directors struggled with whether to put the boy's call on the transplant list or not(Dimmock & Fisher, 2017). Outcome, whoever has viewed the film by James Kearns? John Q is aware that patients and their families will suffer greatly psychologically as a result of the moral implications of healthcare aid allocation. It is a true point that the emotional impacts of a perceived misguided libertarian

system that only considers one's capacity to pay to make distributive decisions may contribute to the lack of future competent members of society as well as the innocence and potential of infancy. The denial of life-sustaining interventions may result in the patient and their immediate family feeling a tremendous feeling of worthlessness (Cassavetes, 2020).

Reference: Cassavetes, N. (2020, August 28). John Q - Denzel Washington, Robert Duvall, James Woods, Anne Heche, Eddie Griffin - Full HD. YouTube. Retrieved March 19, 2023, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8-a9ss_8RM. Dimmock, M., & Fisher, A. (2017, July 31). Ethics for A-level. Google Books. Retrieved March 19, 2023, from https://books.google.com/books/about/Ethics_for_A_Level.html? id=jdsvDwAAQBAJ. Kant, I. (2022, August 12). The categorical imperative. Philosophical Thought. Retrieved February 25, 2023, from https://open.library.okstate.edu/introphilosophy/chapter/the-categorical- imperative/.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Ethical Analyjsis Essay

Related Documents