M9 lab report
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University at Buffalo *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
151
Subject
Mathematics
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
7
Uploaded by JudgeExplorationGorilla39
M9 Simple Harmonic Motion
VI-I
Holder mass: m
H
= 5 g
Spring mass: m
s
= 2.8 g
Flag mass: m
f
= 3.5 g
X
0 = 39 cm σ
x0
= ±0.1 cm
M (g)
X
m (cm)
X = x
0
- x
m (cm)
20
36.5
2.5
40
34
5
60
31.5
7.5
80
28.9
10.1
100
26.3
12.1
120
23.5
15.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
f(x) = 7.85 x + 1.08
M vs X
M vs X
Linear (M vs X)
X (cm)
M (g)
Slope = 7.847233
Slope uncertainty = 0.22922
Y-intercept = 1.075133
Y-intercept uncertainty = 2.246218
Y=sx+b
S= (k)(g)
K = s*g
K = (7.847233 g/cm)(980 cm/s
2
) = 7690.29 g/s
2
σ
k = (g)(σ
s
)
σ
k = (980 cm/s
2
)(0.22922 g/cm) = 224.64 g/s
2
K = 7690.29 g/s
2
± 224.64 g/s
2
VI-II
m (g)
m
t (g)
C
1
C
2
C
3
N
1
N
2
N
3
T
1 (s)
T
2
(s)
T
3
(s)
T
1
2
(s
2
)
T
2
2
(s
2
)
T
3
2
(s
2
)
40
48.5
237
240
239
97.2
5
97.2
5
96.2
5
0.61
7
0.61
7
0.62
34
0.38
069
0.38
069
0.38
863
60
68.5
202
201
203
81.7
5
81.7
5
81.2
5
0.73
39
0.73
39
0.73
84
0.53
861
0.53
861
0.54
5234
80
88.5
178
177
178
69.7
5
67.2
5
70.2
5
0.86
02
0.89
22
0.85
41
0.73
994
0.79
602
0.72
9487
100
108.
5
160
160
161
65.7
5
63.7
5
65.7
5
0.91
255
0.94
12
0.91
25
0.83
275
0.88
586
0.83
265
120
128.
5
148
148
148
58.7
5
59.2
5
59.2
5
1.02
128
1.01
27
1.01
26
1.04
301
1.02
556
1.02
5359
N
1
= (2(C
1
– 1)+1)/4
N
1
= (2(237 – 1)+1)/4 = 97.25
T = 60.00/N
T
1
= 60.00/97.25 = 0.6170
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
f(x) = 0.01 x + 0.06
T^2 vs m
T^2 vs m
Linear (T^2 vs m)
m (g)
T2 (s)
Slope = 0.008094
Slope uncertainty = 0.000465
Y-intercept = 0.059488
Y-intercept uncertainty = 0.039416
The figure in the book (which is roughly between 0.333 and 0.405) does not match the amount provided here. This inaccuracy could be caused by a few factors. I can see from my graph that the third and fourth data points are incorrect. They differ a little. This can result in a greater value of and a higher y-intercept.
VI-IV
d = 2.6
σ
d = 0.1
l'
l = l'
+ d/2
C1
C2
C3
N1
N2
N3
T1 (s)
T2 (s)
T3 (s)
T12 (s2)
T22 (s2)
T32 (s2)
30.5
31.8
104
104
105
36.2
5
36.2
5
37.7
5
1.65
52
1.65
52
1.76
55
2.73
696
2.52
619
1.92
46
39.2
40.5
93
93
93
43.2
5
43.2
5
43.2
5
1.49
068
1.49
068
1.48
068
2.22
213
2.22
213
2.17
23
48.2
49.5
85
86
85
42.2
5
43.7
5
42.2
5
1.42
011
1.54
886
1.42
011
2.01
671
2.11
623
2.01
671
57.1
58.4
78
78
78
38.2
5
38.2
5
38.2
5
1.52
866
1.52
866
1.52
866
2.33
86
2.33
86
2.33
86
69.2
70.5
71
71
71
35.2
5
35.2
5
35.2
5
1.61
073
1.61
073
1.61
073
2.59
445
2.59
445
2.59
445
77.3
78.6
67
67
67
27.2
5
27.2
5
27.2
5
1.83
465
1.83
465
1.83
465
3.36
59
3.36
59
3.36
59
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
f(x) = 0.01 x + 1.77
L vs T^2
L vs T^2
Linear (L vs T^2)
L (cm)
T2 (s2)
Slope = 0.014219
Slope uncertainty = 0.011351 Y-intercept = 1.765385
Y-intercept uncertainty = 0.649768
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help