Discussion 6
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Maryland Global Campus (UMGC) *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
610
Subject
Management
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by MajorMoleMaster406
Name of Business & Industry
1
Chesapeake Spice Company
Food Manufacturing
2
Amazing Glaze
Paint/Pottery Studio
3
University of Maryland, Baltimore
University Recreation & Fitness (URecFit)
Employee Contacted
Job Title
Ellen Gaeta
Controller
Elizabeth Miller
Regional Manager
Jimmy Mszanski
Senior Assistant Director
Org Goals/Mission
Sales of a product – Manufacture and deliver quality seasonings and tastes to customers
Sales of a product/experience – To deliver high quality painting experiences to customers
University Mission: Service – “To improve the
human condition and serve the public good of Maryland and society at-
large through education, research, clinical care, and service”
URecFit Mission: Service – “To enrich the academic experience as well as encouraging the physical, mindful, cultural, spiritual, emotional, and social development of the University of Maryland, Baltimore (UMB) community”
Type of technology using
Admin – Proprietary software (batching, scheduling, invoicing, purchasing), Microsoft
Excel; Plant – automatic baggers/shrink wraps, Radiation Gamma Red Rays (for sterilization)
Point of sales – Clover system; Workshops/Marketing – Facebook, HTML
URec Fit Admin – Mindbody business software (scheduling, check-in), Microsoft Excel; URecFit Fitness – Zoom (live classes during COVID pandemic), Exercise equipment
Organization structure
Geographic Structure
Functional Structure
University: Divisional Structure
URecFit: Matrix Structure
Team vs. Individual
Team
Team
Team
Interdependence
Yes; all positions are necessary for overall function
Yes; all positions are necessary for overall function
University: No; each department has a separate overall mission/goal and function independently
URecFit: Yes; teams within URecFit need to work together for overall function
Tasks: Routine vs. non-
routine
Routine
Routine
Routine
Specialization of tasks by employee
Plant employees are responsible for first-
line work such as:
-
Manufacturing
-
Food processing
-
Line safety
Administrative employees are responsible for:
-
Accounting
-
Budgeting
-
Customer relations
-
Sales
-
Product recipe
design
-
Hiring
Store employees are responsible for first-line work such as:
-
Customer sales
-
Customer relations
-
Workshops
The regional manager is responsible for administrative tasks such as: -
Hiring
-
Accounting/budget
-
Sales tracking
-
Product orders -
Marketing
All employees have basic CPR/first aid skills but each team member has a specialized role. Fitness classes are taught by specialized instructors, life guards are responsible for pool safety, floor staff have cleaning and patron safety obligations, and the administrative staff is responsible for management of these teams within URecFit.
Standardization of products/services
Service to customers and general products remain standardized but adjustments must be to customize products for each food
processing customer (e.g. Boar’s Head Provisions Co, Inc. requires different spice requirements than Utz Quality Foods, Inc.)
Service to customers and general products remain standardized and many products remain consistent throughout the year, but adjustments must be made to account for changing seasons and holidays
University: Specializations for each department and roles within each department
URecFit: All employees have basic CPR/first aid skills but each team member also has a specialized role. Fitness classes are taught by specialized instructors, life guards have Decision making Centralized/Decentralized
Centralized
Centralized
University: Decentralized
URecFit: Centralized
Type of market focus
Customers – Food Processing Companies
Customers – General Public
Students and Staff of University of Maryland, Baltimore
What surprised you and why?
Recommendations?
It was surprising to learn that although this is a geographic Within this company, the administrative roles are heavily weighed on the It was surprising
structure, the company is still small enough that the decision making remains centralized. The owners are able to work closely between both the east
and west coast plants. Typically, with a geographic structure, the worry may be that
the decision making becomes decentralized (Black & Bright, 2019). I would recommend building a work plan for future growth. How will the company respond if growth continues to the point where the owners are no longer able to maintain a centralized decision-making role?
regional manager only. That is surprising considering the background managerial functions are so pivotal to success of the company. It should be imperative that these job functions can be completed even if the regional manager is unavailable for some reason (leaves for a new job, injured in an accident, etc.). Therefore, it is my suggestion to ensure store managers learn the functions of the regional manager and can assist in the event that the regional
manager is unavailable.
Although all three of the employees interviewed work for companies that use three different organizational structures, all three also had common themes including team environments, centralized decision-making (Company 3’s subunit) and routine tasks. Team work is a growing trait in many companies and therefore it is unsurprising that each other three interviewees indicated that a team environment was utilized in their workplace. Also, the thought of routine tasks can be very much associated with a mechanistic structure. A mechanistic structure and centralized decision-making can be associated with the phases of organizational life cycle that each company is in. Company 1 is in a sustained success or maturity phase of the organization life cycle. Company 2 is in phase 2, survival and early success of the organizational life cycle. Company 3 is in the fourth phase of the organizational life cycle, renewal. As such, the overall institution does not maintain centralized decision-making. But, the subunit that the interviewed employee operates within, URecFit, is associated with a sustained success life cycle. Therefore, all employees indicated the centralized decision making approach used within their
working environment.
It is interesting how three very different companies still have overarching themes that are similar approaches to the function of the organization. But, as stated previously, each company also uses different organizational structures. As Sandhu and Kulik (2019) suggest, as the goals and sizes of each organization evolve, the organization structure should also evolve. This is true for the three companies identified for this assignment. Company 2 utilizes a functional structure. The business is smaller and
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
employs fewer workers than Company 1 or 3. Its goal is to sell their products/experience to the general public as customers. As such, Company 2’s top-down structure contributes to that goal and ensures front-line workers completing the bulk of the customer experience. Company 1 utilizes a geographic structure. This company is evolving from a small-business into a larger company. Their goal is to sell quality food products to food processing customers (other companies). This means that the structure differs from Company 2 or 3 to ensure success. Company 1 needs to ensure quality products with the front-line worker teams within each geographical location. But the organization differs for each location
when it comes down to the sales teams and other administrative roles. This is true because of the differing locations and cultures surrounding each location. Finally, Company 3 is a University and therefore implores a divisional structure. The goal of the University is to serve the general good of its students and staff. The students and staff require many services, including health, fitness, research, education, etc. Therefore, the institution as a whole operates with many subunits that operate as their own entity majority of the time. For example, the associate interviewed from Company 3, is a part of a subunit. That subunit then utilizes its own matrix-style structure.
References
Black, S., Bright, D. (2019). External Environments and Industries…
Sandhu, S., Kulik, C. (2019). Shaping and Being Shaped: How Organizational Structure and Managerial Discretion Co-evolve in New Managerial Roles. Administrative Science Quarterly 64
(3), 619-658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218778018
University of Maryland, Baltimore. About UMB. https://www.umaryland.edu/about-umb/
University of Maryland, Baltimore. URecFit: About URecFit
. https://www.umaryland.edu/urecfit/about-
us/
Related Documents
Recommended textbooks for you
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dfe4/8dfe4483ddef74855b02648efe90cf19111517a4" alt="Text book image"
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management
ISBN:9781305969308
Author:Richard L. Daft
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Recommended textbooks for you
- Management, Loose-Leaf VersionManagementISBN:9781305969308Author:Richard L. DaftPublisher:South-Western College Pub
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dfe4/8dfe4483ddef74855b02648efe90cf19111517a4" alt="Text book image"
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management
ISBN:9781305969308
Author:Richard L. Daft
Publisher:South-Western College Pub