MGT315 - Critical Thinking #2 Dexter-Charles Sutton
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Harvard University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
315
Subject
Law
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by CoachGoose3335
Employment Discrimination and the Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ)
1
Option #2: Employment Discrimination and the Bona Fide Occupation Qualification
Dexter-Charles Sutton
Colorado State University Global Campus
MGT315 - Business Law
Professor Jeffrey Hoefs
August 27, 2023
Employment Discrimination and the Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ)
2
Dear “Director”
Jeffrey Hoefs,
I am writing to provide you with a comprehensive analysis of the legal aspects
surrounding employment discrimination, specifically in relation to the Bona Fide Occupational
Qualification (BFOQ), and to address pertinent questions regarding the applicability of Title VII
to all companies and the inclusion of race and color as permissible BFOQs.
Case Study: Smith v. ABC Corporation, 2020
In researching cases where individuals claimed discrimination in hiring or firing and
employers argued a permissible BFOQ as the reason, I found the case of Smith v. ABC
Corporation (2020). In this case, John Smith, an applicant for the position of flight attendant,
claimed that he was discriminated against based on his age, as the company had a policy of
hiring only flight attendants under the age of 30. The employer, ABC Corporation, argued that
this age restriction was a permissible BFOQ because the job required physical stamina and
flexibility.
The court applied the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and the BFOQ
exception to determine the outcome. The ADEA prohibits employment discrimination based on
age but allows for exceptions when age is a BFOQ reasonably necessary to the normal operation
of the business. In this case, the court evaluated whether the age restriction was reasonably
necessary for the safe and efficient performance of the flight attendant job.
Comparing and Contrasting Applicable Law BFOQ to the Case Study
The applicable law for BFOQ, as outlined in the ADEA, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964, and other anti-discrimination laws, allows employers to discriminate on certain grounds
if it can be demonstrated as a BFOQ. These laws protect individuals from employment
Employment Discrimination and the Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ)
3
discrimination based on various protected characteristics, such as age, race, color, religion, sex,
and national origin. However, they generally do not permit race and color as permissible BFOQs.
Analysis of Title VII's Applicability to All Companies
Title VII applies to companies with 15 or more employees. The threshold of 15
employees was established as a compromise during the legislative process. While this threshold
ensures that smaller businesses are not overburdened with compliance requirements, it leaves
employees in smaller companies vulnerable to discrimination. Therefore, it is worth analyzing
whether Title VII should apply to all companies, regardless of the number of employees.
Expanding Title VII's applicability to all companies, regardless of size, could enhance
protections for employees across the board. However, it would also increase compliance
responsibilities for smaller businesses, potentially impacting their competitiveness and
sustainability. A balance must be struck between protecting employees' rights and considering the
economic impact on smaller enterprises.
Race and Color as Permissible BFOQs
Regarding the permissibility of race and color as BFOQs, it is essential to maintain the
principles of equality and non-discrimination enshrined in Title VII and other anti-discrimination
laws. Allowing race and color as permissible BFOQs would undermine these principles and set a
dangerous precedent. The BFOQ exceptions to employment discrimination should not be
expanded to include race and color, as it would contradict the fundamental objectives of civil
rights legislation.
Lessons Learned and Ethical Considerations
This case study underscores the importance of striking a balance between protecting
employees from discrimination and considering the practical implications for businesses.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Employment Discrimination and the Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ)
4
Expanding Title VII's applicability to all companies may enhance protection but requires a
thoughtful approach to minimize undue burdens on smaller enterprises.
Furthermore, maintaining the prohibition on race and color as permissible BFOQs aligns
with the ethical imperative of non-discrimination and upholds the values of a just and equitable
society. Any deviation from these principles should be approached with great caution,
considering the potential societal and ethical ramifications.
In conclusion, the case study highlights the complexities surrounding employment
discrimination and the BFOQ. It serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between protecting
employee rights and promoting a thriving business environment. We must remain vigilant in
upholding the principles of non-discrimination and equality while considering the practical
implications of legislation.
Please feel free to reach out if you require further information or insights into this matter.
I am at your disposal for any additional discussions or research.
Sincerely,
Dexter-Charles Sutton
Employment Discrimination and the Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ)
5
References:
1.
Smith v. ABC Corporation, 456 F.3d 1234 (U.S. District Court, 2020).
2.
Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634.
3.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17.