Case Study -2 -Tejjot Kaur
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Canadore College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
02
Subject
Information Systems
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by MagistrateFire12578
1. Based on your use of streaming services, do you feel the streaming platforms differ in terms of
stand-alone value (For Example, fidelity, ease of use, recommender systems, etc.)
Different streaming platforms have different stand-alone values depending on things like recommender systems, quality, and usability. One innovator in the field is Netflix, which has an advanced recommender system that can recognize user preferences. On the other hand, Amazon Prime neatly combines advantages like free shipping within its larger Prime ecosystem. The convenience of use of the platforms varies; some people find Netflix appealing, while others value Disney+'s customizing features.
The uniqueness of each platform contributes to its value on its own. Amazon Prime provides a complete customer experience by using its broad network. Netflix has an amazing recommender system that makes locating content easier. Disney+'s enormous franchise portfolio appeals to people who cherish nostalgia and family time. As Netflix led the way, other firms have made their mark by offering several solutions to meet their customers' wants and interests.
Stand-alone value is ultimately decided by user preferences, such as seamless integration, content discovery, or a family-friendly experience. As the streaming industry advances, platforms are constantly developing stand-alone features to appeal to a diverse spectrum of viewers.
2.
Again, based on your use, how do you feel the streaming services differ based on the types and
quality of content they provide?
Streaming services set themselves apart by curating original content and building their brand around categories and standards of excellence. As a trailblazer, Netflix thrives on an extensive library that is enhanced by its hit series like "Stranger Things" and "Squid Game." Disney+, a competitor that caters to families, enthrals viewers with an abundance of well-known franchises, including Marvel and Star Wars. By acquiring MGM strategically, Amazon Prime fortifies its position and broadens its selection of great movies.
Uniqueness and excellence are just as vital to differentiation as quantity of content. Every platform has a unique content strategy that meticulously customizes offerings for particular audiences. Disney+ fosters nostalgia and family appeal, Netflix sets the standard for diverse and inventive storytelling, and Amazon Prime makes money off beloved classics.
The key to viewer engagement in this cutthroat environment is content. Ensuring original and superior content is crucial for drawing and keeping members. Recognizing the value of curation in content, streaming platforms continuously improve their approaches to cater to a wide range of viewer interests and maintain their positions in the ever-changing streaming industry.
3. What factors do you think influence a consumer’s choice of whether to subscribe to a streaming service? How important are the standalone features? How important is the content?
Many variables affect consumers' decisions to subscribe to streaming services, but two main ones
stand out: content and stand-alone features. The whole streaming experience is improved by stand-alone features like sophisticated recommendation algorithms and user-friendly interfaces. However, content becomes a crucial element with a significant impact. Exclusive films and television series turn into deciding factors that frequently catalyze selecting a specific platform.
When making decisions, consumers give careful consideration to the whole user experience, which includes smooth navigation, excellent streaming quality, and platform dependability. A platform's attractiveness is greatly enhanced by its capacity to provide a simple, error-free experience. Although standalone features improve user engagement, the availability of varied and appealing material continues to be a motivating factor.
Moreover, reasonable considerations like price, package discounts, and the accessibility of desired content could be more important to a significant segment of the clientele than stand-alone
features. It's still critical to strike a careful balance between features and content as streaming services strive to cater to shifting consumer tastes and offer a comprehensive and comfortable viewing experience.
4. What are the pros and cons of having content exclusive to a service?
Pros:
Brand Loyalty:
Providing unique content fosters brand loyalty, which in turn creates a devoted fan following that links the platform to interesting and unique series or franchises, thereby enhancing enduring relationships with customers.
Competitive Edge:
By offering original content, standing out in a crowded market, and drawing users searching for distinctive and high-quality entertainment, platforms can acquire a significant
competitive advantage.
Quality control:
Streaming platforms can manage more about the image and calibre of their original content, which leads to an improved and standardized viewing experience that is in line with the standards and brand of the platform.
Cons:
Limited Audience Reach:
Exclusive material may draw in a limited audience despite its allure. A platform's appeal to a certain demographic may be limited if users with particular interests don't think the material on other platforms is as useful as it is on this one.
Expenses:
Creating unique material is more expensive, which has an overall negative impact on profitability. Investments in unique, high-calibre productions could put financial resources under pressure, endangering the platform's long-term sustainability.
Content Dependency:
An excessive reliance on original content might lead to content dependency issues. A flagship series or program that falls short of expectations may make it difficult for the platform to maintain viewer attention.
5. Do you think the market will eventually choose a few services as “winners” and the other services will exit (or combine with the winners) or will the market continue to support many different services?
There are numerous potential outcomes, and it is unknown where the streaming industry will head in the future. One probable outcome is the formation of a limited number of dominant services that are the clear "winners," with the others consolidating or exiting the market. The ability to secure exclusive, high-quality material, pricing considerations, and market saturation may be the primary driving forces for this change. However, the market can go a different path and continue to offer a diverse range of services, each tailored to a specific population or speciality. The extent to which streaming platforms can adapt to changing client tastes, market dynamics, and technological innovations will decide how far the sector will advance in the future
years.
In summary, stand-alone value, content offerings, customer preferences, and market dynamics are all having an impact on the dynamic streaming landscape. The future of streaming services will be shaped by the intricate interactions between these dynamics, which might either consolidate the industry or foster a wide ecosystem of specialized platforms.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help