CJ 230 Module Two Journal
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Southern New Hampshire University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
230
Subject
History
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by ProfFogMandrill13
Module Two Journal
Allison Pfannenstiel
CJ 230 Southern New Hampshire University
Integrity can be defined as the quality of being trustworthy and incorruptible, to the extent that an individual is unable to betray a trust, responsibility, or commitment. Authority is the indisputable right to be obeyed, which is derived through the fulfillment of a designated position or task. Discretion refers to the capacity or power to decide among multiple options within a certain context (Garner, 2016).
The differences between these concepts are that someone who has authority is chosen by a specific organization involved in the justice system, whereas discretionary powers cannot be granted. Integrity is when someone follows moral principles, while authority refers to the power one person has to control others. Each of these concepts is naturally present in criminal justice and among the employees of this management system. The concepts discussed share similarities that are directly related to the justice system. Authority and discretionary power share similarities as they both require individuals to hold a prominent position and possess the necessary experience and merit to be granted discretionary power. In order for individuals to possess authority from the beginning, it is necessary for them to demonstrate integrity in utilizing their abilities. Each of these concepts is necessary because they play a critical role in maintaining the integrity and impartiality of the court and all justice system employees. When it comes to adults, honesty plays a crucial role in the field of criminal justice (Pollock, 2019).
The criminal justice system must be credible, authoritative, and discretionary with
adult offenders. These positions are crucial to impartial justice. The criminal justice system relies on honesty. High moral standards define integrity. Integrity in the criminal justice system implies judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and police personnel always act ethically. They must protect the accused and uphold the law. The criminal
justice system would fail without honesty and fairness. Authority is crucial to the criminal justice system. It means the ability to set rules and make decisions. Juries, prosecutors, and police have criminal justice authority. These parties' decisions can affect
defendants greatly. Therefore, they must utilize their power legally and responsibly. One's discretion is the freedom to behave without rules. In criminal justice, judges, prosecutors, and police employ discretion. They control the most critical criminal justice processes, including charging, plea bargaining, and sentencing. With such power comes the responsibility to use it wisely and for fairness. Honesty, authority, and discretion are essential when dealing with adult defendants in criminal justice. These positions ensure the accused's fair treatment and rights throughout the legal procedure. All system participants must have integrity, responsible leadership, and prudence. The criminal justice system can defend the rule of law and provide equal treatment in this manner (Pollock, 2019).
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
References
1.
Garner, G. W. (2016). Leading COPS: Decision-making for the law enforcement leader. Charles C Thomas Publisher. https://eds-s-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/eds/ebookviewer/ebook/
bmxlYmtfXzExMDc0MzVfX0FO0?sid=1213c857-0931-4777-804b-
bdc51e5faad3@redis&vid=0&format=EB&rid=1
2.
Pollock, J. M. (2019). Ethical dilemmas and decisions in criminal justice (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.