Keron Persaud - Plant Competition Lab

docx

School

Baruch College, CUNY *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1004

Subject

Geography

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by Keron18

Report
Keron Persaud Christopher Finck ENV 1004 20 May 2023 Plant Competition Lab Questions Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Treatment Group B Dry Weight W Dry Weight B Dry Weight W Dry Weight B Dry Weight W Dry Weight B Dry Weight W Dry Weight B Dry Weight W Dry Weight 0% B 100% W 0 0.005 0 0.006 0 0.207 0 0 0 0 20% B 80% W 0.668 0 0.76 0.275 0.215 0.193 0 0 0.912 0 40% B 60% W 0 0 0.358 0.151 0.843 0.07 0.567 0 0.768 0 60% B 40% W 0.502 0 1.14 0.069 1.251 0.105 0.577 0 0.61 0 80% B 20% W 0 0 1.816 0.11 1.222 0 0.098 0 0.947 0 100% B 0% W 1.26 0 1.504 0 1.221 0 0.541 0 3.049 0 1. State the null and alternative hypothesis of this experiment. Null Hypothesis: In a replacement series experiment, inter- and intraspecific competition have equivalent effects on plant yield. The total combined yield of plants in polycultures is equivalent to the yield of each plant species grown separately. Alternative Hypothesis: In a replacement series experiment, inter- and intraspecific competition have different effects on plant yield. The total combined yield of plants in polycultures is either less than or greater than the yield of each plant species grown separately, indicating the presence of high or low interspecific competition. This suggests that niche partitioning or facilitation occurs, allowing species to differentiate their niches and coexist. 2. Compare the dry weights of mung bean plant of varying percentages. Is interspecific competition stronger or weaker than intraspecific competition? After comparing the dry weights of mung bean plant of varying percentages, interspecific competition is weaker than intraspecific competition because as the percentage of mung bean plant diversity increases this causes the weight of the mung bean plant to increase. Intraspecific competition refers to competition among individuals of the same species. In this case, as the percentage of mung bean plants increases and the weight of mung beans increases while wheat beans decrease, it suggests that the mung bean plants are competing with each other for resources such as nutrients, light, or space within the same treatment group. Members of the same species may be better adapted to their environment and therefore be able to outcompete members of
other species. The competition within the mung bean species leads to an increase in their weight as there are fewer wheat beans competing for limited resources. 3. Compare the dry weights of wheat plant of varying percentages. Is interspecific competition stronger or weaker than intraspecific competition? After comparing the dry weights of wheat plant of varying percentages, interspecific competition is stronger than intraspecific competition because as the proportion of wheat beans decreases and the weight of mung beans increases, it suggests that the mung bean plants are benefiting from reduced competition with the wheat beans for resources. The mung beans are outcompeting the wheat beans for resources such as nutrients, light, or space, resulting in higher mung bean weights. We see that there is an increase in competition between the different species indicating that as there is more wheat beans the competition tends to somewhat decrease however, there is still competition between the available resources indicating more interspecific competition rather than intraspecific competition. As we look at the chart above the weight tends to fluctuate more so towards wheat beans, as there is less of a percentage of mung beans as there is limited number of resources that each species is fighting for between each other instead of within the same group. 4. Is there niche overlap or niche partitioning between mung bean and wheat plants? How can you tell from the de Wit diagram? Based on the de Wit diagram and the class data there is niche partitioning between mung bean and wheat plants. I can tell from the de Wit diagram because when we graphed the class data using the class means the de Wit diagram show parallel trends or consistently increase or decreasing as the proportion of mung beans or wheat plants varies, it suggests niche partitioning. Niche partitioning occurs when species differentiate their resource use or occupy slightly different ecological niches to minimize competition. In this case, the mung beans and wheat plants are likely utilizing different resources and reducing direct competition, leading to a difference in yields for both species. Based on the diagram as the percentages of both plants continue to increase and decrease, we see an overall increase in mung beans weight, and a general decrease in wheat beans weight, portraying the use of different resources indicating niche partitioning.
5. Would you recommend planting mung bean and wheat plants together in the same field? Explain your reasoning. When considering planting mung bean and wheat plants together in the same field, there are many factors to consider. One important factor is the level of interspecific competition between the two species. If interspecific competition is high, it is likely that one or both of the species will not perform well. Another crucial factor is the climate. Mung beans require a warm climate to thrive, while wheat plants can tolerate a wider range of climates. If the climate is unsuitable for growing mung beans, they will struggle. Additionally, we must consider the difference in size between mung beans and wheat plants. Wheat plants, being larger, will compete more for resources compared to mung beans. If the competition between the two species is excessive, neither species is likely to thrive. If the goal is to maximize the yield of either mung beans or wheat, it may be more beneficial to plant them separately rather than together. Interspecific competition, indicated by the decrease in wheat bean weight as the proportion of mung beans increases, can potentially limit the productivity of both species. However, if the objective is to promote ecological diversity or specific management practices can mitigate competition, it is possible to plant mung bean and wheat together in a mixed cropping system. Mixed cropping systems offer benefits such as improved resource utilization, pest management, and soil fertility. When deciding whether to plant mung bean and wheat together, it is important to consider the level of interspecific competition and the suitability of the climate. Unsuitable climate or excessive competition can lead to poor performance of both species. 6. Based on the class results, would you expect the competition coefficients and β of the ɑ Lotka-Volterra model of competition to be equal or unequal to each other? If not, how do the competition coefficients differ? Based on the class results, if we observe different outcomes in terms of the dry weights of mung bean and wheat plants in the presence of competition, it suggests that the competition coefficients ( and β) of the Lotka-Volterra model of competition are likely to be unequal. The ɑ competition coefficients represent the per capita effects of one species on the other. If the dry weights of mung bean plants decrease more significantly in the presence of wheat plants compared to the decrease in wheat plant weights in the presence of mung beans, it implies that the per capita effect of wheat plants on mung beans (β) is stronger than the per capita effect of mung beans on wheat plants ( ). In other words, the competition from wheat plants has a greater ɑ impact on mung bean growth and survival than the competition from mung beans on wheat plant growth and survival. The unequal competition coefficients ( and β) in the Lotka-Volterra model ɑ of competition indicate that one species has a greater influence on the other in terms of resource utilization and competitive advantage. This imbalance in competitive effects can be attributed to differences in resource requirements, growth rates, or competitive abilities between mung bean and wheat plants, leading to a stronger impact of one species on the other. Therefore, the competition coefficients are unequal, reflecting asymmetric competition between the two species.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help