Case analysis Microsoft's acquisition of Skype

pdf

School

San Jose State University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

187

Subject

Finance

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

2

Uploaded by ConstableStarling3854

Report
Case analysis: Microsoft's acquisition of Skype 1. What were the benefits to Microsoft's shareholders of using cash held overseas to purchase Skype? Utilizing foreign funds decreases the impact of the high valuation. It is tax-efficient to use foreign funds and foreign subsidiaries that hold cash abroad have low corporate tax rates. Under US Law, Microsoft is exempt from paying taxes on profits that are permanently reinvested outside of the United States. Given that foreign tax is about 4% and the corporate tax rate in the nation is 35%, Microsoft saves 31% on taxes. 2. Microsoft's effective tax rate on foreign earnings retained overseas appears was only 4 percent at the time of the case. How was this possible given that the corporate tax rate in most developed nations where Microsoft earns profits from foreign sales are considerably higher? Microsoft claimed that the 4% decrease to 31% would be the result of foreign tax credits the business had paid on its foreign earnings. Microsoft does not pay taxes on those who earn money until they are repatriated to the US, even though the actual tax rate in the United States is 35%. 3. Why did Microsoft hold so much cash overseas, rather than returning it to the United States? What do you think are the opportunity costs of holding tens of billions of dollars in cash in foreign locations? What potential benefits might accrue to Microsoft shareholders if it returned some of that cash to the United States? Microsoft has 3 main reasons for holding so much cash overseas: transactional, preventive, and tax. The money earned does nothing but sit around and earn very little interest. Since the management of the corporation has the final say over dividend payments, there won't be as much money available for reinvestment and business expansion if the company pays out huge dividends. 4. Do you think it is ethical for companies like Microsoft to continue to hold cash overseas in order to avoid paying U.S. corporate income taxes? Is this practice always in the best interests of the company's shareholders? Microsoft is avoiding taxes and not evading taxes. It is lawful to retain investment gains abroad if the condition for investors is better in a foreign country. Ultimately, when Microsoft benefits, the company’s shareholders benefit as well. 5. In January 2018, a change in U.S. tax law (a) lowered the top tax rate on U.S. corporate income from 35 percent to 21 percent, and (b) established a policy that corporate earnings should only be taxed where they are earned. How do you think this impacted Microsoft's tax minimization strategies?
The change in US tax law in January 2018 would weaken Microsoft’s tax minimization strategies. Microsoft would lose its advantage in saving taxes since the corporation would have to pay foreign taxes as well. Also, the decrease in US tax might motivate Microsoft to return portions of the cash back to the States.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help