Assignment1

docx

School

Northern College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

3023

Subject

Finance

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

1

Uploaded by ankurathrav

Report
Case Study – IIROC Vs JOHN DONNELLY (Group 4) Being a branch manager at Raymond James, John Donnelly failed to prevent a financial advisor from making unsuitable investments. He also failed to supervise the account of the client with respect to her investment objective during the period May to November 2010. Details of the client The client was 51 years old, being unemployed she didn’t have a regular source of income. She came to Raymond James as to where she should invest her $2 Million that she received from an insurance policy. Objections Even though her advisor Probhash Mondal proposed a portfolio that consisted 90% in bonds, he went on to undertake unapproved significant trades that were extremely aggressive with respect to the market conditions and the risk tolerance of the client. Moreover he was engaging the client in speculative positions that were very risky trades. Another blunder on his part was that he ignored the fact that almost entire sum of the portfolio was being invested in a single stock. There was absolutely no diversification at all. Between January 2010 and May 2010, there was a significant increase in the concentration of Bank of America shares. He also ignored the fact that heavy margins were used, ran large debit balance. Not only that short selling was frequently included in the trading strategies. What Should have been done? In the investigation, the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) found that John Donnelly didn’t question that whether the activities were suitable for the client. As a branch manager, he should have kept a skeptical approach regarding the changes in the investment objective of the client so fast. The investment objective shifted from 90 percent bond portfolio to 90 percent equity. That should have immediately rung the bell. He should have had talks with the advisors as to what is going on with the client account. It was also found that he failed to make inquiries of the advisor Mondal when he kept on making numerous and frequent trades in the same security repeatedly in a single day for this client as well as several other clients. Settlement An agreement was reached on July 5, Donelly accepted the fine of $300 plus $1500 in cost. In addition to fine, he was suspended to act as a supervisory role for a whole year. IIROC also charged the advisor Mondal by suspending him from the business for a period of 5 years plus a fine of $10,000 plus cost 10,000.
Discover more documents: Sign up today!
Unlock a world of knowledge! Explore tailored content for a richer learning experience. Here's what you'll get:
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help