classification of learning

docx

School

Grand Canyon University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

POS-500

Subject

English

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by ChancellorFox3409

Report
Classifications Based on English Language Learners Dorothy Haughton College of Education, Grand Canyon University POS-500: U.S and Arizona Constitutions for Teacher Candidates Tyson Cullimore November 1, 2023 1
Classifications Based on English Language Learners Checking to see if a student is an English learner involves several steps. Each state usually has its own way of classifying things. As a first step, each state requires students to take a test to see if they need to be put in English-language classes (National Research Council, 2011). Some states also have surveys that ask students to write down what language they spoke most often as a child (National Research Council, 2011). Assessments could put students in classes where they don't belong, so it's important to know about them (Abedi, 2008). There was an article about "Theories of Second Language Acquisition" and how important it is for students to understand how learning a new language works so that they can understand it better (Abedi, 2008). Some people believe that students will learn a new language on their own, while others say that learning a new language depends on the environment (Abedi, 2008). It is important to remember this because every student learns in their own way, so it might be different for each student to learn a new language. The lack of a formal system for grouping students is what puts many of them in the wrong classrooms or makes them fall behind in their work. Some groups, like students who are culturally and linguistically diverse or students who are learning English as a second language, were used in the past. However, most of these terms are now considered outdated and don't really describe anything (Learning for Justice, 2017). Legal Issues Presented by the Classifications People who are supposed to be learning English and have to go to classes to do so might be controversial. It might make some students feel bad that they have to take classes that other students don't have to. Some people may think that all American schoolchildren should be able 2
to speak and understand English. Additionally, parents of English language learners may feel scared because their children may have parents who are immigrants. immigrant students from being treated unfairly in school because of their immigration status (Sugarman, 2019). For immigrant parents, "Plyler v. Doe and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act" makes it safe to send their kids to school (Sugarman, 2019). But parents may feel scared when their kids are in English classes because they feel like they are being watched. This change in equal protection law can be seen in a few important Supreme Court cases. In the case of Independent School District v. Salvatierra (1930), parents of Mexican American descent in the small border town of Rio in the state of Texas sued the school district for segregation (Orozco, 2020). In this case, the court agreed with the school district that keeping immigrants away from other students was necessary to teach English. Individual rooms were utilized to keep immigrants separate from their peers. It didn't work in a similar case in California, though: Alvarez v. Lemon Grove (1931). In the Alvarez case, the judge said that separating the students did not help them learn English (Zinn Education Project, 2022). Since the Constitution of this country's equal protection rights was written, courts have made different decisions. Equal Protection As stated in the Fourteenth Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause is a significant law in public education. Courts have used it to stop separating children based on a variety of differences. Along with protecting against discrimination based on race, sex, and other factors, the Equal Protection Act also protects children whose parents are not legal citizens from not being able to go to school. It also says that school districts and state 3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
education departments have to make sure that everyone has the same chances to participate (Learning for Justice, 2017). For ELL students, this also means getting rid of language barriers. The Plyler v. Doe court case in 1982 and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 are both efforts to give immigrant parents peace of mind that their children's immigration status will not be revealed when they sign them up for school (Sugarman, 2019). So that families wouldn't think they couldn't get an education based on citizenship, this was done. The United States Constitution says that everyone who wants to get an education should be able to get one, no matter where they come from. 4
References ELL 101. Learning for Justice. (2017). Retrieved April 27, 2022, from https://www.learningforjustice.org/magazine/spring-2017/ell-101#:~:text=Federal %20Laws%20Protecting%20ELL%20Students&text=The%20Equal%20Educational %20Opportunities%20Act,language%20barriers%20for%20ELL%20students Sugarman, J. (2019). Legal protections for k-12 english learner and immigrant-background students. Washington D.C. Migration Policy Institute. from https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/EL- Insight_LegalFramwork_Final.pd Davis, J. (2008). Classification system for English language learners. National Council on Measurement in Education. Retrieved April 27, 2022, from https://education.ucdavis.edu/sites/main/files/LEP_Class_EMIP_New.pdf "4 State Procedures for Identifying and Classifying English Language Learners." National Research Council. (2011). Allocating Federal Funds for State Programs for English Language Learners. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13090. Abedi, J. (2008). Classification system for english language learners: Issues and recommendations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(3), 17-31. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00125.x 5