Rhetorical essai (1)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Grand Canyon University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
105
Subject
English
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by AgentLapwing7626
1
Between Machines and Morality
Rémy Vergnes
Grand Canyon University
English-105
Joseph Altnether
09/28/2023
Introduction
In a world increasingly shaped by technological advancements, the ethical questions
surrounding the use of lethal autonomous weapons (LAWs), commonly known as "killer robots,"
have become a pressing concern.This rhetorical analysis delves into Joony Thomson’s article,
“Killer robots and the banality of evil”, which appeared in
Big Think,
in 2022 to dissect the
persuasive strategies employed to engage the reader in a profound moral debate.The text
explores the ethical concerns surrounding the use of lethal autonomous weapons (LAWs),
emphasizing issues related to their lack of moral judgment, potential detachment from the value
of human life, and challenges in assigning accountability. It underscores the debate over whether
machines should have the authority to make life-and-death decisions, with an emphasis on the
importance of human control in these situations. Ultimately, the moral debate is rhetorically
successful with a well fostered use of ethos, logos, and pathos.
2
Effective or Ineffective rhetorical analysis
Intended audience
Thomson aims to engage a broad audience, including those who may not have an in-
depth knowledge of the specific technology or ethical theories evoked. In his article “Killer
robots and the banality of evil”, Jonny Thomson makes the topic accessible to a wide field of
readers, not just experts in the field. “Let’s make the issue a bit more personal” (Thomson , 2022,
para.4). The author uses relatable examples and language to make the content accessible. This is
evident when he writes “James Bond, agent 007 has a ‘license to kill’” (Thomson , 2022,
para.2.).The article is written in a way that makes it appealing for multiple audiences. More than
one audience is always a problem, but Thomson is able to dissect the technical advancements,
and the ethical questions. Multiple readers such as: critical thinkers, current affairs, law
enforcers, technology enthusiasts can all have a different understanding and knowledge of the
topic, but this method with accessible language, real-world examples, and exploration of moral
questions make it appealing to a broad readership. This makes the article more interesting with
an organized and effective message.
Ethos
Accordingly, the author attempts to establish ethos in several points in this editorial.
Thomson establishes his credibility by referencing real-world examples, including the San
Francisco Police Department's petition (Thomson , 2022, para.6.) and the Dallas police force's
use of a robot (Thomson , 2022, para.5.). By grounding the argument in these tangible instances,
he appeals to the reader's trust in facts and evidence . These references show that the author did
his research and the use of citations furthermore adds credibility to the topic. Additionally, the
mention of organizations like Stop Killer Robots (Thomson , 2022, para.8.) further bolsters his
credibility, as it invokes recognized authorities in the field and more references from experts. The
citation of specific real-world examples and mentions of organizations specialized on the topic
3
help readers feel the author's credibility.
Logos
Furthermore, the article proceeds logically in an effective way. Progressing from a broad
discussion of the concept of "license to kill" (Thomson , 2022, para.7.) to specific examples and
the moral implications of robotic warfare. (Thomson , 2022, para.7.). Thomson acknowledges
opposing viewpoints, such as the potential for LAWs to save lives, and addresses them with
counter arguments. By doing so, he demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the issue
and strengthens his overall argument. This inclusion of counterarguments invites a balanced and
critical examination of the topic.Thomson effectively employs logos by drawing parallels
between human decision-making and potential machine autonomy, challenging the reader to
consider the logical consequences of such a development.
Pathos
In this
article the ethos and logos are mostly very effective and the pathos is not an
exception to the rule.The article deftly taps into the reader's emotions by highlighting the
emotional and moral dilemmas surrounding the use of LAWs. The reference to Hannah Arendt's
perspective on Adolf Eichmann's detachment from his actions elicits a deep emotional response
(Thomson, 2022, para.9.). Clearly, it challenges conventional notions of evil, highlights the
consequences of thoughtlessness, and raises questions about moral responsibility. The phrase
"killer robots" itself carries a potent emotional weight, conjuring images of machines that take
lives without empathy or compassion. These emotional triggers engage the reader and make the
ethical debate more relatable.
Conclusion
Ultimately, “Killer robots and the banality of evil” rhetorical strategies are masterfully
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
employed to engage the reader in a profound moral debate. Through ethos, logos, and pathos, the
article persuades readers to consider the ethical implications of autonomous weapons, fostering
critical thinking and contemplation on the role of technology in our increasingly complex world.
The structured organization, repetition, inclusion of counterarguments, and emotional resonance
contribute to a persuasive and thought-provoking piece by leaving readers with an unresolved
ethical dilemma, it prompts them to reflect on their own values and beliefs and consider the
implications of granting machines a "license to kill."
References
Jonny, T. (2022). Killer robots and the banality of evil.
Big Think
. Retrieved from
https://bigthink.com/thinking/killer-robots-banality-evil/