Create a model of the improvement process described above and compare its

docx

School

Trine University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

MISC

Subject

Economics

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

8

Uploaded by MasterScience9621

Report
A. Create a model of the improvement process described above and compare its behaviour to the data for the semiconductor firm. Once you have formulated your model, make sure the units of each equation are consistent. Hand in your final documented Vensim model file (.mdl file). By stopping additional defect sources from developing, the defect prevention rate lowers the amount of defects upon introduction. B. Run your model with the base case parameters, and hand in the plot . a. Briefly describe the model’s behaviour.
The number of flaws in the system does not decrease more quickly as the time to eradicate them grows since there is a delay in doing so. In this scenario, the defect reduction step before the model is run is as follows: 3
The aforementioned graph displays the model's execution versus the original model settings for a time step of 0.125 and beginning defects of 1500 ppm as a measure under a time of 0.75, which represents the system's defect elimination period. The behavior of the model is a decreasing of the flaws during the time step. The amount of faults in the defects rate decreases as the simulation's time along the model grows. The removal of systemic faults, which occurs gradually depending on when team members first identify the problems in the system, is the cause of the decline in the number of defects. b. How well does your simulation match the historical data? Are the differences likely to be important if your goal is to understand the dynamics of process improvement and to design effective improvement programs? The simulation and the historical data are similar in that there is a link between the data flow and the curve from the last period to the time, t, at zero. Although the curve appears to be moving toward 0 at one point, it does not truly approach zero since equilibrium exists.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
The model's data is displayed in the image above. It is evident that the data gathered across the various periods has a decline in the time step, or table. c. Does the stock of defects reach equilibrium after 9 months (the average defect elimination time)? Referring to the structures in your model, explain why or why not. Yes, the equilibrium state has been reached after nine months. The equilibrium is maintained by the constant introduction of fresh sources of faults into the system. New flaws are added throughout time, increasing the rate of problems. This causes an increase in the final consequences. However, the defect removal process, which is dependent on the time variable and the complexity of the defect elimination, has an impact on the defect rate. By eliminating flaws, the number of faults decreases over time, leading to equilibrium at the end of the month. Aged 0.75 years)
C. Experiment with different values for the average defect elimination time. What role does the defect elimination time play in influencing the behaviour of other variables? Ensuring continuity in the defect elimination process is one of the functions of the defect elimination time. The number of flaws removed in the system decreases as the defect elimination time grows since it takes longer to reduce faults; hence, the quantity of defects decreases more slowly or is really "increasing." Conversely, if the time it takes to eradicate defects decreases, it means that more faults will be handled, which will significantly lower the defect rate and mean that less flaws will be read by the system since more defects are deleted within the allotted time. D. Explore the sensitivity of your model’s results to the choice of the time step or “dt” (for “delta time”). o Note: Before answering this question, read Appendix A in Business Dynamics . b) Change the time step for your model from 0.125 years to 0.0625 years. Do you see a substantial difference in the behavior?
The two TIME STEPS behave very differently from one another. Red and blue, respectively, depict the two time steps at 0.125. The curve declines as the time step decreases. This is because fixing numerous flaws takes less time.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
b) What happens when dt equals 0.5 years? Why does the model behave as it does? The timestep at 0.5 is depicted in the above image. At this time step, defect elimination is high, meaning treating several flaws at once takes less time. c) What happens when dt equals 1 year? Why does the simulation behave this way?
We ultimately deal with a greater number of flaws at time step 1. An assumption derived from the model states that the faults will eventually read zero. The model eventually returns to equilibrium and subsequently to normal.