Module 1 Critical Thinking

htm

School

Colorado State University-Global Campus (Online) *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

ISM511

Subject

Computer Science

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

htm

Pages

Uploaded by AgentKnowledgeBear41

// Dashboard ISM511-1 Module 1: Critical Thinking <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211> // Skip To Content <#content> Dashboard <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/> * Jeremy Cerny Account <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/profile/settings> * Dashboard <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/> * Courses <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses> * Calendar <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/calendar> * Inbox <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/conversations> * History <#> * Help <https://help.instructure.com/> * <#> Close <#> // * /My Dashboard / <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/> * ISM511-1 <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211> * Assignments <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/ assignments> * Module 1: Critical Thinking <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/ courses/89211/assignments/1768621> Spring 2024 8 Week Session A * Home <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211> * Syllabus <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/ assignments/syllabus> * Modules <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/modules> * Discussions <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/ discussion_topics> * Assignments <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/ assignments> * Zoom <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/ external_tools/1163> * Grades

*3 * <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/grades> * Announcements <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/ announcements> * People <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/users> * Library <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/ external_tools/45804> * Student Portal <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/ external_tools/48719> * Writing Center <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/ external_tools/49247> * Online Tutoring <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/ external_tools/49989> Module 1: Critical Thinking Start Assignment * Due No Due Date * Points 70 * Submitting a file upload 1. //Module 1: Introductions, Discussion (1 of 7) <https:// csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/modules/items/4662678> 2. //Module 1: Overview (2 of 7) <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/ courses/89211/modules/items/4662685> 3. //1.1 Introduction to Cloud Computing (3 of 7) <https:// csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/modules/items/4662691> 4. //1.2 Web 2.0 (4 of 7) <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/ 89211/modules/items/4662699> 5. //1.3 Cloud Types (5 of 7) <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/ courses/89211/modules/items/4662709> 6. //Module 1: Discussion Forum (6 of 7) <https:// csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/modules/items/4662715> 7. //Current Assignment: Module 1: Critical Thinking , Assignment (7 of 7) <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/modules/items/ 4662721> Critical Thinking Assignment (70 Points) *Important! Read First * Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission. Option #1: SaaS and PaaS

Research SaaS and PaaS, and then answer the following questions in essay format: 1. What is the difference between SaaS and Paas in terms of SDLC (software development lifecycle) processes? 2. What recruitment tools can companies use to attract, hire, and integrate talented individuals into the company culture as it relates to cloud processes in the SDLC? 3. What performance-management tools can companies use to evaluate public and private PaaS or SaaS models? Remember to outline the necessity for planning the SDLC growth and eventual replacement of the system deployed. Your paper should be 2-3 pages in length (not including cover and reference pages) and should incorporate support from at least two academic sources from the CSU Global Library in addition to the course readings. The essay, citations, and references must conform to the requirements explained in the CSU Global Writing CenterLinks to an external site. <http://csuglobal.libguides.com/apacitations>. Review the rubric below for specific grading criteria. Option #2: IaaS and IDaas Research IaaS and IDaaS, and then answer the following questions in essay format: 1. What is the difference between IaaS and IDaaS in terms of network and usage within an environment? Does the size of a company make a difference in offerings? 2. What recruitment tools can companies outside of the United States use to attract, hire, and integrate talented individuals into the company culture when using a private or public IaaS? Would the use of such property hinder hiring processes? 3. What performance-management tools can companies use to evaluate public and private IaaS or IDaaS models for integration into their Enterprise environment? Remember to outline the necessity for planning for company and infrastructure growth as well as security concerns and eventual replacement of the system deployed. Your paper should be 2-3 pages in length (not including cover and reference pages) and should incorporate support from at least two academic sources from the CSU Global Library in addition to the course readings. The essay, citations, and references must conform to the requirements explained in the CSU Global Writing CenterLinks to an external site. <http://csuglobal.libguides.com/apacitations>. Review the rubric below for specific grading criteria. 0 * File Upload <#submit_online_upload_form> Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. File: Upload File

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Use Webcam //remove empty attachment <#> // Add Another File //remove empty attachment <#> Click here to find a file you've already uploaded I agree to the tool's End-User License Agreement.Links to an external site. <https://api.turnitin.com/api/lti/1p0/user/static_eula> This assignment submission is my own, original work Cancel Submit Assignment Rubric // <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/rubrics/688123? rubric_association_id=1907496> // <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/ search/rubrics?q=> // <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/ rubric_associations/1907496> true 1907496 <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/rubric_associations/ 1907496/assessments/%7B%7B%20assessment_id%20%7D%7D> <https:// csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/rubrics/ %7B%7B%20rubric_id%20%7D%7D> <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/ courses/89211/rubric_associations/%7B%7B%20association_id%20%7D%7D> Can't change a rubric once you've started using it. <https:// csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/rubric_associations/ %7B%7B%20association_id%20%7D%7D> Find a Rubric <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/search/rubrics?q=> Title: Find Rubric <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/search/rubrics?q=> ISM511 Mod 1 CT You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results. ISM511 Mod 1 CT Criteria Ratings Pts //Edit criterion description <#> // This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements _8799 Range threshold: pts //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 10 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. _9776 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 8 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. _7772 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#>

6 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. _8216 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 4 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. _7126 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 10 pts -- Additional Comments <#> //Edit criterion description <#> // This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content _9797 Range threshold: pts //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 10 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. _3255 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 8 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. _8042 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 6 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. _7663 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 4 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. _6793 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 10 pts -- Additional Comments <#> //Edit criterion description <#>

// This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis _8070 Range threshold: pts //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 20 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the differences between SaaS and PaaS or IaaS and IDaaS. Recruitment tools to attract personnel and performance-management tools to evaluate models for integration are insightfully incorporated into the analysis as directed in the prompt. _7106 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 16 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. _7871 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 12 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. _9852 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 8 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. _1250 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 20 pts -- Additional Comments <#> //Edit criterion description <#> // This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources / Examples _7845 Range threshold: pts //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 10 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. _6484 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 8 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. _7551 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 6 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. _5328 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 4 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. _6866 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 10 pts -- Additional Comments <#> //Edit criterion description <#> // This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college- level proficiency in organization, grammar and style. _7528 Range threshold: pts //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 10 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. _3825 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 8 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Project is fairly well organized and written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. _6462 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 6 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. _1234 // <#>

//Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 4 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not organized or well written, and not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. _3222 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 10 pts -- Additional Comments <#> //Edit criterion description <#> // This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style. _6489 Range threshold: pts //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 10 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error. _5650 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 8 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors. _8920 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 6 to >4.0 pts Approaches Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors. _8430 // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 4 to >0 pts Below Expectation Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors. _9234 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 10 pts -- Additional Comments <#> //Edit criterion description <#> // This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion Range

threshold: 5 pts //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 5 pts -- Additional Comments <#> Total Points: 70 out of 70 I'll write free-form comments when assessing students Remove points from rubric Don't post Outcomes results to Learning Mastery Gradebook Use this rubric for assignment grading Hide score total for assessment results Cancel Create Rubric Description Long Description Cancel Update Criterion Additional Comments: Cancel Update Comments Additional Comments: Rating Score Rating max score to > pts Rating Title Rating Description Cancel Update Rating Rubric // <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/rubrics/ %7B%7B%20id%20%7D%7D> // <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/search/ rubrics?q=> // <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/ rubric_associations/%7B%7B%20rubric_association_id%20%7D%7D> <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/rubric_associations/ %7B%7B%20rubric_association_id%20%7D%7D/assessments/ %7B%7B%20assessment_id%20%7D%7D> <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/ courses/89211/rubrics/%7B%7B%20rubric_id%20%7D%7D> <https://

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/rubric_associations/ %7B%7B%20association_id%20%7D%7D> Can't change a rubric once you've started using it. <https:// csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/rubric_associations/ %7B%7B%20association_id%20%7D%7D> Find a Rubric <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/search/rubrics?q=> Title: Find Rubric <https://csuglobal.instructure.com/search/rubrics?q=> Title You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results. Title Criteria Ratings Pts //Edit criterion description <#> // This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion Range threshold: 5 pts //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 5 pts -- Additional Comments <#> //Edit criterion description <#> // This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion Range threshold: 5 pts //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank // <#> //Edit rating <#> //Delete rating <#> 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 5 pts -- Additional Comments <#> Total Points: 5 out of 5 I'll write free-form comments when assessing students

Remove points from rubric Don't post Outcomes results to Learning Mastery Gradebook Use this rubric for assignment grading Hide score total for assessment results Cancel Create Rubric //Previous Previous: Module 1: Discussion Forum <https:// csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/modules/items/4662715> Next// Next Module: Module 2: Cloud Computing - Getting Started <https:// csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/89211/modules/items/4662735> 64f561d8-9e99-40e0-a82b-eeb3d38d92fb

Module 1 Critical Thinking

Related Documents