Reactions

pdf

School

Montana State University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

131

Subject

Chemistry

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

6

Uploaded by meadowzricki

Report
PRECIPITATES—Exp. C-2 Name 0\]”"‘ C' Lab Section Lab Partner Pre-Lab Assignment: Study Appendix D.5 on filtration techniques. Problem Statements: What is the reaction between Co(NOs); and NazPO4? Are all of each reactant consumed in a reaction? Why or why not? I. Data Collection and Analysis: Qualitative A. Dissolve a small amount (about 1 cms3) of solid cobalt nitrate, Co(NQs)s, in about 20 mL of distilled water. Dissolve a similar amount of sodium phosphate, NasPQ,, in a second 20 mL of water. Describe the appearance of each solution. Co(N03)y disolued iwmaliaty g piak e No, Py Yaly lorg to st Clo s olispors B. Pour half of each solution into a third beaker and mix thoroughly. (Save the mixture and two solutions for later use.) 1. Describe the appearance of the mixture. 2. Assuming the reaction involves the coming together of dissolved ions, what are the possible identities of the solid formed in the mixture? Think up and carry out experiments which would distinguish among all of the possibilities. Describe the results of these experiments. 3 (0(N03)y ¥ N3 POy~ (o 5 (M4), +9Na WOy coai' ¢ &NO?; v SV\)R" POqS’ 16 a0y iy e A 16w v Wac s CoA03) for Wt Sl pet WDy ad b o o prigie 003(004); a W Wd}' 23
3. Write a chemical equation which represents the reaction and is consistent with the data obtained so far. Briefly explain your reasoning. 2‘/\)&3004 ¢ BCO[NO}.L =l Na 03 + C Oj(pofffil C. Separate the mixture by filtration (see Appendix D.5). Note the characteristics of the liquid, called the supernatant, and predict all of the materials which might be dissolved in the liquid. [ 1y de. Poosde (olPon) Wzgmhmm W pr. fs " D. Divide the supernatant in half and test each half with the remaining Co(NOs); and NazPO, solutions. Describe the results. Co (o3, - 2 VU@; Doy - pinke/ pupe E. What conclusions can be drawn from these data concerning the chemicals present in the supernatant? (e.g., How might changing the original amounts of Co(NOs); and NagPO, affect the composition of the supernatant?) ] Z’MW")“W/ h,fl o e vemagind o*/ 803(00»1)2 Buane of flo_CoAo Chagg i the Wy Py Prside (0% ions tirg abole Yo fom COs ({Dy), = 24
II. Data Collection: Quantitative A. Obtain 90 mL of stock Co(NQOs), solution in a clean, labeled beaker. Obtain 60 mL of stock NasPO, solution in a second labeled beaker. Record the concentrations in the data table below. Clean and distilled-water rinse four 100 mL beakers and label them 1-4. Into each beaker measure 20.0 mL of stock Co(INOs); solution. Measure various amounts of stock NasPO, into each beaker. The suggested amounts are: 5.0, 10.0, 15.0, and 20.0 mL Mix each solution thoroughly and allow it to stand for at least 10 minutes. Calculate the masses of salts added to each beaker and record these amounts in the table below. B. Set up four filter funnels with filter papers and labeled collection beakers. Mix and filter each reaction mixture from part IT.A through a separate funnel, collecting its supernatant in a labeled beaker. You are to collect at least 20 mL of each supernatant, clean of any precipitate. When this is done, move on to part II.C. Data Table 3 Concentration of stock NasPO, solution 9 - ol?[_’ X ,O g/mL -3 Concentration of stock Co(NQ3), solution D . Q : %[0 g/mL mL stock mL stock grams grams Limiting Reagent Solution Na;PO, Co(NOs), NazPO, Co(NOs), by Tests . by Calculation ; GmL 20 QOMEF powsH Gl 0422 > 0wl 20 0.63974 Q.0usH p.ouiq 3 1Sul 20 o004l 0o4sH _ 00Ut 4 20w 0 009948 p.oust W Q.0\517% J Wasfoq b 2COU00 Y, <> (5 oy ¢ Colfdul, ) Ly WV 207 0.05F( WM 3P0 [UBAH Wasfor x 52 ¥ S % 0- 0LbH 0- 0913 0. 015 1% 25
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
C. Describe the appearance of each of your supernatants. Divide each of the supernatants into two parts. Test one part with a dropperful of Co(NOs); and the other with a dropper full of Na3P04 solution. Summarize the results of these tests below. Sml. NagPOy | Mu«,wmu cotwo;);m b}] ), Eq o oML NayP0y 2 Sl lDmL ;m. flo,nL Supes palt 15mL NaaPOu 3 Hwpuent purle loe ), 00y = o oml NagPou K bw’jijmf O"W@ F—] rr’ 5"‘ y III. Data Analysis A. Explain the result of this testing of the supernatants. That is, explain what these results show must have happened in each reaction mixture. (For example, why can you form more precipitate from a supernatant? Why don’t all four supernatants give the same test results?) From this analysis, fill in the column labelled “Limiting Reagent by Tests” in the table on the previous page. 4'%{/’4/”/’ ZflbhO"‘— (5mLJ0mL j)5mL [20:ML§0J69'$}""’31 i adoled o O{Z"W(”fl ColM0s), or MhayPOu. T e color Wflflt\/ fu 0[71)‘)3)7— o WasPOy s a ) Ken ks o |t ovv Lo of D0 i 1L syppplns. 26
B. Mental Model—Draw a picture showing how the reaction can give both the precipitate and the supernatant seen in one of your reaction mixtures. In other words, illustrate your reasoning in question ITI.A using a picture of the reaction. Nz Pou | 2 | flac'flb"’t e A e o e % S'nx/'/* | Cofbodr | C. Predict what the limiting reactant should have been in each reaction mixture. Do this by assuming the chemical equation you wrote in part 1.B.3, page 24, is correct and then calculating which reactant should run out first. Record the results of your calculations in the last column of the data table on page 25. Show the calculations for mixtures #1 and #3 below. |" A Co\owU' Co (MD3), @Nvfl Uus -OlsT# wo O q £ 0Lty Nagl0n - N, - o2l - BLIP - Dwlotly Cos(f0y lwel .\ . 8290 .0H$'”7 (’a(wb)2.~ '\%2%‘":1 3 182.909 . (§2.9e. _ 4 Mn"] Ny - “,3,0,‘;, ' Jg —F 0- 035‘2? 27
IV. Conclusion Summarize the data for and against the chemical equation you wrote for the reaction between Co(NOs)s and NasPO, in aqueous solution. In particular, explain how calculations involving weight data can be used as evidence for or against a given reaction idea. Finally, do you feel your equation reflects what nature is really doing? Briefly explain. 0 Tl culoulabivs Cone wd @y enduvee fol T res %M@q::'jmfilsfi flo e S St "'\M_M/exp M iy COMDZ D) J lweding N«),MA' M W 003(%'4)1 28
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help