Kristin Bautista-Task 5_Action_Potential_8.24.23

pdf

School

California State University, Long Beach *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

D075

Subject

Biology

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

4

Uploaded by kbautista09

Report
Laboratory Report LABORATORY REPORT Activity: Action Potentials Name: Kristin Bautista Instructor: Kim Shahi Date: 08.24.2023 Predictions 1. Exceeding threshold depolarization at the trigger zone______the likelihood of generation of an action potential. decreases 2. Action potential amplitude does not change with distance 3. Increasing frequency of stimulation to the trigger zone does not change number of action potentials. Materials and Methods Experiment 1: Effect of Stimulus Strength on Action Potential Generation 1. Dependent Variable membrane potential 2. Independent Variable stimulus strength (voltage) 3. Controlled Variables frequency of stimulation, type of neuron Experiment 2: Effect of Frequency of Stimulation on Action Potential Generation 1. Dependent Variable membrane potential 2. Independent Variable frequency of stimulation 3. Controlled Variables stimulus strength (voltage), type of neuron 4. Which part of the neuron was stimulated? Dendrites 5. Where was membrane potential measured? Axon Hillock and Neuron's Axon (the trigger zone) 6. What was used to measure membrane potential? Patch clamps were used for current mode can assess membrane potential changes in voltage. Results Table 3: Change in Membrane Potential From Axon Hillock to Axon a. Values of maximal depolarization of membrane potential (mV) at different stimulation voltages, by location. Laboratory Report/ Kristin Bautista/ Action Potentials/ Kim Shahi/ 08.24.2023/ Page [1] of [4]
Laboratory Report Stimulation Voltage Location 0 V (no stimulation ) 2 V 4 V 6 V 8 V Axon hillock -68.6 -63.6 -56.1 31.5 31.1 Axon -67.8 -72.8 -64 31.1 30.8 b. Action Potential Generation. Stimulation voltage Location 0 V (no stimulation ) 2 V 4 V 6 V 8 V Action potential generated? No No No Yes Yes Change in membrane potential with distance -0.8 9.2 7.9 0.4 0.3 Graph 1. Maximal depolarization of membrane potential at axon hillock and axon after different stimulation voltages. mV -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 1 2 3 4 5 1. no stimulus 2. 2 V 3. 4V 4. 6V 5. 8V Resting membrane potential = -70 mV. 1. What was the resting membrane potential (no stimulation) recorded in Table 3? The resting membrane potential is -67.6 mV to -68.6 mV. 2. At which stimulation voltage(s) did you see decrimental conduction of graded potential from axon hillock to axon? Decrimental conduction of graded potential from axon hillock to axon seen in stimulation voltage 2V. 3. At what stimulus voltage(s) did an action potential occur? Action potential occurred in 6V and 8V. 4. What was the membrane potential at the axon hillock when the action potential was generated? Action potential occurred in 6v and 8v. 5. For each of the stimulation voltages, indicate whether it was sub-threshold, threshold, or suprathreshold. a) 2V Sub-threshold b) 4V Sub-threshold c) 6V Threshold d) 8V Threshold Laboratory Report/ Kristin Bautista/ Action Potentials/ Kim Shahi/ 08.24.2023/ Page [2] of [4]
Laboratory Report Table 4: Effect of Supra-Threshold Stimulation Frequency on Action Potential Generation. Frequency of the Five Supra-Threshold Stimuli 25 Hz 50 Hz 100 Hz 200 Hz 400 Hz Period between stimulations (ms) 40 msec 20 msec 10 msec 5 msec 2.5 msec Number of Action Potentials Produced 5 5 3 1 1 Refractory period effect? No No Yes Yes Yes Graph 2. Number of action potentials generated at different times between stimulations. Number of action potentials produced 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1. 40 msec(25 Hz) 2. 20 msec(50 Hz) 3. 10 msec(100 Hz) 4. 5 msec(200 Hz) 5. 2.5 msec(400 Hz) 6. State the amount of time between stimulations for each frequency of stimulation. a) 25 Hz 40 msec b) 50 Hz 20 msec c) 100 Hz 10 msec d) 200 Hz 5 msec e) 400 Hz 2.5 msec 7. For each frequency of stimulation, indicate whether the period between stimulation is longer or shorter than the length of an action potential. Length of action potential in pyramidal neuron is about 15-20 milliseconds (msec). a) 25 Hz Longer b) 50 Hz Longer c) 100 Hz shorter d) 200 Hz shorter e) 400 Hz shorter Laboratory Report/ Kristin Bautista/ Action Potentials/ Kim Shahi/ 08.24.2023/ Page [3] of [4]
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Laboratory Report 8. Estimate the length of the refractory period for the pyramidal neuron. Estimate length of refractory period for pyramidal neuron is appx 10 msecs. Discussion 1. In Experiment 1, discuss why the amplitude of the action potential did not increase as stimulation voltage increased above threshold. Once a neuron hits its stimulation threshold, it goes into a refractory period where the action potential doesn’t increase. The neurons communicate with the nervous system function. Either the neurons fires or not. This means that the intensity of the stimulus doesn't affect the magnitude of the action potential. Instead, it only affects the frequency at which they generate the impulses. 2. In Experiment 1, explain why the membrane potential between the axon hillock and axon either changed or did not change with subthreshold stimulus. Differences of 1.0 mV or less are not significant. When sodium ions hit a cell, they only cause a change if the neuron depolarizes at the threshold stimulus. This happens because it opens up the voltage-gated Na+ channels, which lets more Na+ into the cell and makes the membrane less charged. A subthreshold shock won't change the membrane potential if there isn't any depolarization. 3. In Experiment 1, explain why the membrane potential between the axon hillock and axon either changed or did not change with threshold stimulus. Differences of 1.0 mV or less are not significant. When the threshold stimulus was applied, there was no change in the membrane potential between the axon hillock and axon. However, depolarization occurs once the threshold is reached. At this point, sodium ions are permitted to pass through, causing the necessary alteration. 4. In Experiment 2, explain why the number of action potentials generated varied with increased stimulation frequency. As stimulation frequency increased, action potentials changed. Short trigger intervals were shorter than system response time. Once the threshold stimulus is reached, all stimuli above it must refractory before causing another action potential. Since the requisite refractory period is not satisfied, action potentials decrease with stimulation frequency. As stimulation frequency increases, action potentials shift. This is because action potentials require refractory periods. 5. Restate your predictions that were correct and give the data from your experiment that supports them. Restate your predictions that were not correct and correct them, giving the data from your experiment that supports the correction. Due to refractory period, boosting voltage from 6V to 8V barely enhanced signal amplitude. Once the threshold is reached, stimulus strength does not affect membrane events. Positive feedback loops from depolarization cause action potentials. Amplitude change down the axon was 0.4 and 0.3. A stimulus location determines non-refractory membrane conductivity. Cells fire action potentials. Each cell has an all-or-none threshold, thus stimulus strength or frequency does not enhance output. Application 1. ECF potassium levels affect resting membrane potential. Hyperkalemia (excessive levels of potassium in the blood) and hypokalemia (abnormally low blood potassium levels) both affect the function of nerves and muscles. a. Explain how hyperkalemia will initially affect the resting membrane potential and the generation of an action potential. Hyperkalemia is a metabolic issue caused by excess potassium in the blood. It can cause irregularities in muscles, including the heart, fatigue, and breathing difficulties. It decreases the resting membrane potential, leading to partial depolarization and making the membrane more excitable. This affects the flow of potassium and sodium in and out of cells, making it hard to trigger an action potential. b. Explain how hypokalemia will initially affect the resting membrane potential and the generation of an action potential. Cells are negative and less likely to ignite with low potassium. Cell excitation is eliminated by hyperkalemia. The transport of potassium affects intracellular and extracellular ratios differently than total body potassium. When the resting membrane potential decreases, it disrupts the flow of potassium and sodium, making it harder to trigger action potentials. Accumulation of potassium outside the cell during repolarization hinders the concentration gradient, preventing action potentials. 2. Tetrodotoxin, a toxin found in puffer fish, acts by inhibiting voltage-gated sodium channels. Eating improperly prepared puffer fish sushi can be fatal because of interference with action potential generation. Explain how tetrodotoxin interferes with action potential generation. Toxins from Tetrodotoxin fish targets sodium channels, and can lead to neurological and gastrointestinal issues. The skin, viscera, ovaries, and liver of the fish are the main sources of this toxin. Tetrodotoxin works by binding to voltage-gated sodium channels in the neuronal membrane, which stops Na+ from entering the cell. This prevents depolarization and maintains a negative resting membrane potential, which prevents an action potential. Laboratory Report/ Kristin Bautista/ Action Potentials/ Kim Shahi/ 08.24.2023/ Page [4] of [4]