MEMORANDUM
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Victoria University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
123
Subject
Accounting
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by JudgeResolveSquid5
MEMORANDUM
To:
Supervisor
From:
Re: Lesley Hoeben (t/as Trouble Free Events) v Happy Mercury Festivals Lty Limited Date: 27 February 2024
Following our discussion, we have successfully obtained judgement against Happy Mercury Festivals Pty Limited (“HMF”) for the sum of $146,891.25 plus any accrued interests and costs. Here is a summary of the enforcement methods available against the judgement debtor, along with the necessary procedures and relevant court forms for each method.
If the event the Debtor fails to satisfy the judgement, we may pursue in accordance with r 66.02 CCCPR:
1.
Attachment of earnings order o 72
An attachment of earnings order can be sought which if the judgement debtor receive salary from a third party, a portion can be deducted and paid directly to the creditor. However, this is the less efficient method for our client as it takes a considerable amount of time to recover the full amount owed.
2.
Attachment of debt (garnishee order) o 71
A garnishee order can be issued against any monies owing to the debtor at the time of service of the order. This includes the debtor’s bank accounts, term deposits, contract payments, or any other payments owed to the debtor. Garnishee orders are typically cost-
effective and efficient in recovering the judgement amount. The following procedure is required:
1)
Applying to a Judge of the County Court.
2)
Filling the required summons in Form 71A accompanied by a supporting affidavit that
satisfies the requirements in r 71.01.70.
3)
If leave is granted, Form 71A needs to be triplicate and fee must be paid with the Registry within 30 days of the order.
4)
The garnishee summons and all supporting affidavits will need to be served to the judgement debtor and garnishee within 7 days prior to the hearing. 3.
Warrant of seizure and sale under o 69
A warrant of seizure and sale allows for seizure of the judgment debtor’s property, goods, and chattels, including land. Personal interests in property, such as licenses cannot be
seized. The warrant will authorise the sheriff’s office to seize goods belonging to or held by the judgment debtor which can be sold to fund the payment of the judgement debt. The procedure for enforcing a warrant of seizure and sale under o 69 is as follows:
1)
Form 68A is required to apply for a warrant of seizure and sale with supporting affidavit that satisfies the requirement including.
-
Exhibiting the warrant
-
Exhibiting the advertisement of auction
-
Exhibiting the relevant land titles office search (notice under s 52(2) of the Transfer of
Land Act 1958)
-
Priority issues which may arise
-
Explain the delay.
2)
File the form with the County Court and pay the relevant fees.
3)
Send the warrant once granted to the Sheriff’s office for enforcement.
4.
Bankruptcy
If the judgement debtor has insufficient funds to pay all his creditors, commencing proceedings in bankruptcy is an option. However, it is a costly, length and technical process, with secured creditors having priority over unsecured creditors such as judgment creditors. The judgement creditor may have difficulty in recovering their money from the debtor due to insufficient assets to pay all the creditors. This method is not relevant for our client as the judgement debtor has sufficient assets to cover the judgement.
Recommendations
Based on the specific assets of the judgment debtor, the following recommendations are proposed for enforcement:
A.
Realty: office premises
I recommend a warrant to seize and sell the property, considering the property is valued at $1,300,000.00 and has a mortgage at HVBO bank. With consideration to costs required to be paid for the execution of selling the property, there would still be sufficient funds to cover the judgment order to Lesley.
However, as the property has a joint ownership with Riley McGinty and Josephine McGinty. We are unsure of the interest of other persons to the real estate and therefore cannot determine how much of the sale can be covered to the judgment. B.
Business bank account
Applying for a garnishee order as there is a balance of $30,000.00 in the business account as advised. The order can successfully recover the balance and have it paid directly to Lesley’s judgment order.
C.
Fixed term deposit
Similarly, a garnishee order should be pursued for the balance of $25,000.00 in the fixed term account. D.
Motor Vehicle
No enforcement method as the vehicle is under finance and does not belong to HMF. E.
Debt
Applying for a garnishee order on the debt owed to the judgment debtor for ticket sales of the Ballina Blues Festival at $130,000.
F.
Office equipment
An application for a warrant to seize property and sell non-secured items is recommended to
recover the funds for the order.
I recommend Lesley to first pursue garnishee orders to recover the monies in the business bank account, fixed term deposit and debt owed as they are cost-effective and efficient. According to the last bank statement the balance would be $185,000.00 which is sufficient to
satisfy the order. If unsuccessful, I recommend Lesley to pursue a warrant to seize and sell the office premises being 16 Harrison Street, Hamilton, VIC to cover the debt. Given the property’s substantial value of over $1,300,000.00, it is sufficient to cover the outstanding mortgage, overdue interest, sheriffs costs of enforcement and all relevant costs required to the sale.
Considering concerns regarding joint ownership of the property, it is advised to find out Riley’s interest in the property to ensure sufficient coverage of the judgment debt after all the
costs are satisfied.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Documents
Related Questions
Axel Brick Company has a lawsuit pending from a customer claiming $100,000 in damages. Axel's attorney advises the likelihood the customer will win the lawsuit is reasonably probable. GAAP requires at a minimum that this contingent liability be...
A. Disclosed in a note to the financial statements
B. Record as a liability on the balance sheet
C. Record as an expense on the income statement
arrow_forward
5
arrow_forward
The following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for Erismus, Inc. Erismus's fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial
statements are issued in March 2022. Erismus prepares its financial statements according to U.S. GAAP.
Required:
Indicate the amount Erismus would record as an asset, a liability or if no accrual would be necessary in the following circumstances.
1. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes the company has a slightly worse than 50/50 chance of
eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,480,000.
2. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. If it loses,
management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of $2,900,000 to $5,800,000, with any damage in that range
equally likely.
3. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court.…
arrow_forward
The following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for Erismus, Inc. Erismus's fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial
statements are issued in March 2022. Erismus prepares its financial statements according to U.S. GAAP.
Required:
Indicate the amount Erismus would record as an asset, a liability or if no accrual would be necessary in the following circumstances.
1. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes the company has a slightly worse than 50/50 chance of
eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,620,000.
2. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. If it loses,
management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of $2,530,000 to $5,060,000, with any damage in that range
equally likely.
3. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court.…
arrow_forward
The following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for Erismus, Incorporated Erismus’s fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in March 2025. Erismus prepares its financial statements according to U.S. GAAP. Required: Indicate the amount Erismus would record as an asset, a liability or if no accrual would be necessary in the following circumstances. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes the company has a slightly worse than 50/50 chance of eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,430,000. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. If it loses, management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of $2,830,000 to $5,660,000, with any damage in that range equally likely. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court.…
arrow_forward
Direction: Choose the correct answer.
arrow_forward
The following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for Erismus, Incorporated Erismus's fiscal year
ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in March 2025. Erismus prepares its financial statements
according to IFRS.
Required:
Indicate the amount Erismus would record as an asset, a liability or if no accrual would be necessary in the
following circumstances.
12345
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes the company has a slightly worse
than 50/50 chance of eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,000,000.
2. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will
lose in court. If it loses, management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of
$2,000,000 to $4,000,000, with any damage in that range equally likely.
3. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the…
arrow_forward
I need the qualitative aspect of the analysis
arrow_forward
Axel Brick Company has a lawsuit pending from a customer claiming $100,000 in damages. Axel's attorney advises the likelihood the customer will win the lawsuit is reasonably probable. GAAP requires at a minimum that this contingent liability be...
arrow_forward
Please dont use any AI.
It's strictly prohibited.
arrow_forward
3. Determine the implication of the following independent cases to the December 31, 2020financial statements as per PAS 37, on Provisions, Contingent Liabilities, and ContingentAssets.Case 1On December 5, 2020, an employee filed a P3,000,000 lawsuit against Lance Company fordamages suffered when one of the company’s equipment malfunctioned in August, 2020.In your inquiry of the company’s legal counsel, the legal counsel expects the company willlose the lawsuit and estimates the losses to be between P500,000 and P1,500,000. Theemployee has offered to settle the lawsuit out of court for P1,200,000, but Lance Companywill not agree to the settlement.Case 2Lance Company has guaranteed a loan of P2,000,000 of one of its key officers from a bankin 2020. By the time the financial statements of Lance Company were approved forissuance by its BOD, it is clear that the key officer is in financial difficulties and it is probablethat Lance Company will meet the guarantee.Case 3On December 20, 2020,…
arrow_forward
The following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for Erismus, Inc. Erismus’s fiscal year ends onDecember 31. Financial statements are issued in March 2019. Erismus prepares its financial statements accordingto U.S. GAAP.Required:Indicate the amount of asset or liability that Erismus would record, and explain your answer.1. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus’s management believes the company has a slightly worse than50/50 chance of eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,000,000.2. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus’s management believes it is probable that the company willlose in court. If it loses, management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of $2,000,000 to$4,000,000, with any damage in that range equally likely.3. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus’s management believes it is probable that the company willlose in court. If it loses, management believes that damages will…
arrow_forward
1. Medrano is the defendant in a lawsuit filed by Witt in 2018 disputing the validity of copyright held by Tone. December 31, 2018, Tone determined that Witt would probably be successful for an estimated amount of $400, 000. Appropriately, a $400, 000 loss was accrued by a charge to income for the year ended December 31, 2018. On December 31, 2019, Tone and Witt agreed to a settlement providing for a cash payment of $250, 000 by Tone to Witt, and transfer of Tone’s copyright to Witt. The carrying amount of the copyright on tone’s accounting records was $60, 000 on December 31, 2019. What would be the effect of the settlement on Tone’s income before tax in 2019?
2. On December 31, 20x2, Apostol determines an indication that the impairment loss recognized in the prior period may no longer exist. The revised recoverable amount of the building on December 31, 20x2 is $1,280,000. If no impairment loss had been recognized in the prior period, the carrying amount of the building on December…
arrow_forward
Problem 2: Janmark Company provided the following selected transactions related to contingencies. The
reporting period ends on December 31, 2020, and is issued on March 31, 2021.
The entity is involved in a lawsuit resulting from a dispute with a customer over a 2020 transaction. On
December 31, 2020, lawyers advised that it was not probable that the entity would lose Php
2,000,000.00 in an unfavorable outcome. On February 15, 2021, judgment was rendered against the
entity in the amount of Php 4,000,000.00 plus interest of Php 200,000.000. The entity does not plan to
appeal the verdict.
Since August 2020, the entity has been involved in a labor dispute. Negotiation between the entity and
the union has not produced a settlement. Since January 2020, strikes have been ongoing at these
facilities. It is virtually certain that material cost will be incurred, but the resultant cost cannot be
adequately measured.
• The entity is the defendant in a lawsuit filed in January 2021 in which the…
arrow_forward
corcese Inc. is involved in a lawsuit at December 31, 2020. (a) Prepare the December 31 entry assuming it is probable that Scorcese will be liable for $900,000 as a result of this suit. (b) Prepare the December 31 entry, if any, assuming it is not probable that Scorcese will be liable for any payment as a result of this suit.
arrow_forward
During 2020, Smith Company filed suit against West
Problem 4-31 (AICPA Adapted)
During 2020, Smith Company filed suit against West
Company seeking damages for patent infringement.
On December 31, 2020, the legal counsel believed that it was
probable that Smith Company would be successful against
West Company for an estimated amount of P1,500,000.
On March 31, 2021, Smith Company was awarded P1,000,000
and received full payment thereof. The financial statements
were issued March 1, 2021.
In Smith Company's 2020 financial statements, how should
this award be reported?
a. As a receivable and revenue of P1,000,000.
b. As a receivable and deferred revenue of P1,000,000.
c. As a disclosure of a contingent asset of P1,000,000.
d. As a disclosure of a contingent asset of P1,500,000.
arrow_forward
AXE Co. is the defendant in a lawsuit. AXE reasonably estimates that this pending lawsuit will result in damages of $99,000. It is probably that AXE will lose the case. What should AXE do?
Group of answer choices
a. Record a liability
b. Disclose in notes
c. Have no disclosure
arrow_forward
Subject: accounting
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Accounting Volume 1
Accounting
ISBN:9781947172685
Author:OpenStax
Publisher:OpenStax College
Related Questions
- Axel Brick Company has a lawsuit pending from a customer claiming $100,000 in damages. Axel's attorney advises the likelihood the customer will win the lawsuit is reasonably probable. GAAP requires at a minimum that this contingent liability be... A. Disclosed in a note to the financial statements B. Record as a liability on the balance sheet C. Record as an expense on the income statementarrow_forward5arrow_forwardThe following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for Erismus, Inc. Erismus's fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in March 2022. Erismus prepares its financial statements according to U.S. GAAP. Required: Indicate the amount Erismus would record as an asset, a liability or if no accrual would be necessary in the following circumstances. 1. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes the company has a slightly worse than 50/50 chance of eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,480,000. 2. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. If it loses, management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of $2,900,000 to $5,800,000, with any damage in that range equally likely. 3. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court.…arrow_forward
- The following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for Erismus, Inc. Erismus's fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in March 2022. Erismus prepares its financial statements according to U.S. GAAP. Required: Indicate the amount Erismus would record as an asset, a liability or if no accrual would be necessary in the following circumstances. 1. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes the company has a slightly worse than 50/50 chance of eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,620,000. 2. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. If it loses, management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of $2,530,000 to $5,060,000, with any damage in that range equally likely. 3. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court.…arrow_forwardThe following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for Erismus, Incorporated Erismus’s fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in March 2025. Erismus prepares its financial statements according to U.S. GAAP. Required: Indicate the amount Erismus would record as an asset, a liability or if no accrual would be necessary in the following circumstances. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes the company has a slightly worse than 50/50 chance of eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,430,000. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. If it loses, management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of $2,830,000 to $5,660,000, with any damage in that range equally likely. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court.…arrow_forwardDirection: Choose the correct answer.arrow_forward
- The following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for Erismus, Incorporated Erismus's fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in March 2025. Erismus prepares its financial statements according to IFRS. Required: Indicate the amount Erismus would record as an asset, a liability or if no accrual would be necessary in the following circumstances. 12345 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes the company has a slightly worse than 50/50 chance of eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,000,000. 2. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. If it loses, management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of $2,000,000 to $4,000,000, with any damage in that range equally likely. 3. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus's management believes it is probable that the…arrow_forwardI need the qualitative aspect of the analysisarrow_forwardAxel Brick Company has a lawsuit pending from a customer claiming $100,000 in damages. Axel's attorney advises the likelihood the customer will win the lawsuit is reasonably probable. GAAP requires at a minimum that this contingent liability be...arrow_forward
- Please dont use any AI. It's strictly prohibited.arrow_forward3. Determine the implication of the following independent cases to the December 31, 2020financial statements as per PAS 37, on Provisions, Contingent Liabilities, and ContingentAssets.Case 1On December 5, 2020, an employee filed a P3,000,000 lawsuit against Lance Company fordamages suffered when one of the company’s equipment malfunctioned in August, 2020.In your inquiry of the company’s legal counsel, the legal counsel expects the company willlose the lawsuit and estimates the losses to be between P500,000 and P1,500,000. Theemployee has offered to settle the lawsuit out of court for P1,200,000, but Lance Companywill not agree to the settlement.Case 2Lance Company has guaranteed a loan of P2,000,000 of one of its key officers from a bankin 2020. By the time the financial statements of Lance Company were approved forissuance by its BOD, it is clear that the key officer is in financial difficulties and it is probablethat Lance Company will meet the guarantee.Case 3On December 20, 2020,…arrow_forwardThe following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for Erismus, Inc. Erismus’s fiscal year ends onDecember 31. Financial statements are issued in March 2019. Erismus prepares its financial statements accordingto U.S. GAAP.Required:Indicate the amount of asset or liability that Erismus would record, and explain your answer.1. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus’s management believes the company has a slightly worse than50/50 chance of eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,000,000.2. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus’s management believes it is probable that the company willlose in court. If it loses, management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of $2,000,000 to$4,000,000, with any damage in that range equally likely.3. Erismus is defending against a lawsuit. Erismus’s management believes it is probable that the company willlose in court. If it loses, management believes that damages will…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Accounting Volume 1AccountingISBN:9781947172685Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax College
Principles of Accounting Volume 1
Accounting
ISBN:9781947172685
Author:OpenStax
Publisher:OpenStax College