Reviewing for Contingencies
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Temple University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
201
Subject
Accounting
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
Pages
1
Uploaded by naikamit
Reviewing for Contingencies
A contingency is a situation where uncertainty exists regarding either an obligation to transfer
cash, other assets or an amount that is required to settle the obligation. Proper recognition of
contingencies is a GAAP requirement and the responsibility of management.
FASB ASC 450 establishes the guidance for proper accounting treatment and disclosure for
contingencies. When addressing a contingency, the concept of conservatism must also be
applied. Conservatism requires that when an uncertainty exists, the company must choose the
method of presentation or disclosure “least likely to overstate assets or income and/or
understate liabilities or expenses.” For this reason, gain contingencies are never accrued;
however footnote disclosure may be appropriate.
The auditor begins by asking management, both verbally and in writing, about the company’s
policies for identifying, evaluating, and accounting for loss contingencies. For example, the
auditor may ask management about their knowledge of:
●
Pending or threatened litigation.
●
Asserted and unasserted claims.
●
Violations or possible violations of laws or regulations.
●
Actual or suspected fraud or any allegations of fraud, involving management or
employees.
●
Communications from regulatory agencies concerning noncompliance with, or
deficiencies in, financial reporting practices.
●
Significant product warranties.
●
Anticipated losses on long-term contracts.
●
Guarantees, including indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others.
●
The existence of or potential for environmental remediation liabilities such as the proper
treatment, storage, transportation or disposal of any hazardous wastes
Reading the minutes of board of directors meetings is another source of information used to
identify contingencies. The auditor is looking for any reference to a potential or actual threat of
litigation or other events that meet the criteria of a contingency.
A review contracts, loan agreements, leases, or correspondence from government agencies
should be done to determine the current status known contingencies as well as the possibility
other for identifiable loss contingencies. This procedure is applicable to multiple areas of the
audit. i.e. Planning, commitments, long-term debt.
A review the company’s legal correspondence file and legal invoices should be performed to
determine the type of legal services corporate counsel has provided and the issue addressed.
Attorneys are very thorough and descriptive when it comes to billing for fees.
Discover more documents: Sign up today!
Unlock a world of knowledge! Explore tailored content for a richer learning experience. Here's what you'll get:
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Questions
How can the accounting concept of materiality be applied to the recognition and disclosure of contingent liabilities? Explore the factors that accountants should consider when determining the appropriate level of detail to include in financial statements regarding potential future obligations.
arrow_forward
Which of the following statements about IFRS and GAAP accounting and reporting requirements for the balance sheet is not correct?
a. Both IFRS and GAAP distinguish between current and non-current assets and liabilities.
b. The presentation formats required by IFRS and GAAP for the balance sheet are similar.
c. Both IFRS and GAAP require that comparative information be reported.
d. One difference between the reporting requirements under IFRS and those of the GAAP balance sheet is that an IFRS balance sheet may list long-term assets first.
arrow_forward
With respect to the concept of materiality, which of the following statements is correct?a. Materiality depends only on the dollar amount of an item relative to other items in the financial statements.b. Materiality depends on the nature of a transaction rather than the dollar amount of the transaction.c. Materiality is determined by reference to AICPA guidelines.d. Materiality is a matter of professional judgment.
arrow_forward
Application of the full disclosure principle
requires that the financial statements be
consistent and comparable.
is violated when important financial
information is buried in the notes to the
financial statements.
is theoretically desirable but not
practical because the costs of complete
disclosure exceed the benefits.
is demonstrated by the inclusion of
information such as contingencies.
arrow_forward
For a liability to be recognised within the financial statements, it needs to be reasonably apparent that an obligation to an ____________exists.
Select one alternative:
legal obligation
external party
another party
counter party
arrow_forward
Comment on the statement that materiality is in the eye of the beholder. How does this statement relate to the discussion in this chapter of how to gauge materiality in assessing financial statement restatements? Is materiality inconsistent with the notion of representational faithfulness?
arrow_forward
Which of the following is not a criterion that must be met for an item to be classified as a liability?
A certain cash payment will occur in the future.
A sacrifice will require the entity’s assets or services.
There is a probable future sacrifice.
There is a present obligation that results from a past transaction.
arrow_forward
Accdg. to PAS , related party disclosures are necessary *
to indicate the possibility that an entity's financial position and performance might have been affected by the existence of such relationship
because related party transactions may have resulted to assets and liabilities that were recognized in the financial statements of the reporting entity
to notify users of financial statements of the fact that related party transactions may not have been made on arm's length basis
in order to eliminate or minimize the effects of related party transactions on the FS of the reporting entity
arrow_forward
When an event impacts a financial statement element, it should be recognized in the accounting records even if reliability of the amount is questionable.
True
False
arrow_forward
Which of the following statements is correct? I. To enable users of financial statements to form a view about the effects of related party relationships on an entity, it is appropriate to disclose the related party relationship when control exists, irrespective of whether there have been transactions between the related parties. II. If there have been transactions between related parties, an entity shall disclose the nature of the related party relationship as well as information about the transactions and outstanding balances necessary for an understanding of the potential effect of the relationship on the financial statements. III. Disclosures that related party transactions were made on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s length transactions are encouraged by GAAP. IV. Government-controlled entities are within the scope of IFRSs, i.e. those that are profit-oriented are no longer exempted from disclosing transactions with other state-controlled entities.
arrow_forward
What are accounting errors and how they are reported. What are the disclosure requirements for correction of errors. Please see FASB codification to discuss the disclosure requirements.
arrow_forward
1. Which statement is incorrect regarding materiality judgments?
A. An entity is only required to apply recognition and measurement equirements in PFRSS when the effect of applying them material.
B. An entity need not provide a disclosure specified by a PFRS if the information resulting from that disclosure is not material.
C. Public availability of information relieves an entity of the obligation to provide material information in its financial statements.
D. It is inappropriate for the entity to make, or leave uncorrected, immaterial departures from PFRSs to achieve a particular presentation of its financial position, financial performance or cash flows.
2. Which of the following is an appropriate aggregation?
A. Cash and cash equivalents (Cash in bank and sinking fund)
B. Trade and other receivables (Accounts receivable and investment in bonds)
C. Trade and other payables (Accounts payable and accruals)
D. Provisions (Income tax payable and warranty liability)
3. Which of the…
arrow_forward
Which of the following does not require disclosure in the financial statements?
choices:
There is a present obligation that probably requires an outflow of resources that can be measured reliably.
There is a present obligation that probably requires an outflow of resources but the amount cannot be measured reliably.
There is a possible obligation or a present obligation that may, but probably will not require an outflow of resources
There is a possible obligation or a present obligation where the likelihood of an outflow of resource is remote.
arrow_forward
Don't want Ai Solution
arrow_forward
1. Explain the purpose of operational accountability and the purpose of fiscal accountability. Which category of financial statements is most useful in reporting on each of these accountability concepts?
2. Under GASB guidance, when should an item be recognized on the face of the financial statements? Under what conditions would the GASB indicate that a note disclosure should accompany an item that has been recognized on the financial statements?
arrow_forward
When is it permissible to violate generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)?
arrow_forward
Which statement is incorrect in the measurement of a provision? *a. The risks and uncertainties that inevitably surround many events and circumstances shall be taken into account in reaching the best estimate of a provisionb. Where the effect of the time value of money is material, the amount of a provision shall be the present value of the expenditure expected to settle the obligationc. Future events that may affect the amount required to settle the obligation shall be reflected in the amount of the provision where there is sufficient objective evidence that the future events will occurd. Gains from expected disposal of assets shall be taken into account in measuring a provision
arrow_forward
The Normative Structure for Reporting emphasise the importance of transactions that should be reported on the basis of their economic substance and their legal form. Explain the advantage of “substance over form” and how the financial statements would indicate that the substance of the underlying transaction varies from the legal form.
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337485913
Author:BROOKS
Publisher:Cengage
Related Questions
- How can the accounting concept of materiality be applied to the recognition and disclosure of contingent liabilities? Explore the factors that accountants should consider when determining the appropriate level of detail to include in financial statements regarding potential future obligations.arrow_forwardWhich of the following statements about IFRS and GAAP accounting and reporting requirements for the balance sheet is not correct? a. Both IFRS and GAAP distinguish between current and non-current assets and liabilities. b. The presentation formats required by IFRS and GAAP for the balance sheet are similar. c. Both IFRS and GAAP require that comparative information be reported. d. One difference between the reporting requirements under IFRS and those of the GAAP balance sheet is that an IFRS balance sheet may list long-term assets first.arrow_forwardWith respect to the concept of materiality, which of the following statements is correct?a. Materiality depends only on the dollar amount of an item relative to other items in the financial statements.b. Materiality depends on the nature of a transaction rather than the dollar amount of the transaction.c. Materiality is determined by reference to AICPA guidelines.d. Materiality is a matter of professional judgment.arrow_forward
- Application of the full disclosure principle requires that the financial statements be consistent and comparable. is violated when important financial information is buried in the notes to the financial statements. is theoretically desirable but not practical because the costs of complete disclosure exceed the benefits. is demonstrated by the inclusion of information such as contingencies.arrow_forwardFor a liability to be recognised within the financial statements, it needs to be reasonably apparent that an obligation to an ____________exists. Select one alternative: legal obligation external party another party counter partyarrow_forwardComment on the statement that materiality is in the eye of the beholder. How does this statement relate to the discussion in this chapter of how to gauge materiality in assessing financial statement restatements? Is materiality inconsistent with the notion of representational faithfulness?arrow_forward
- Which of the following is not a criterion that must be met for an item to be classified as a liability? A certain cash payment will occur in the future. A sacrifice will require the entity’s assets or services. There is a probable future sacrifice. There is a present obligation that results from a past transaction.arrow_forwardAccdg. to PAS , related party disclosures are necessary * to indicate the possibility that an entity's financial position and performance might have been affected by the existence of such relationship because related party transactions may have resulted to assets and liabilities that were recognized in the financial statements of the reporting entity to notify users of financial statements of the fact that related party transactions may not have been made on arm's length basis in order to eliminate or minimize the effects of related party transactions on the FS of the reporting entityarrow_forwardWhen an event impacts a financial statement element, it should be recognized in the accounting records even if reliability of the amount is questionable. True Falsearrow_forward
- Which of the following statements is correct? I. To enable users of financial statements to form a view about the effects of related party relationships on an entity, it is appropriate to disclose the related party relationship when control exists, irrespective of whether there have been transactions between the related parties. II. If there have been transactions between related parties, an entity shall disclose the nature of the related party relationship as well as information about the transactions and outstanding balances necessary for an understanding of the potential effect of the relationship on the financial statements. III. Disclosures that related party transactions were made on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s length transactions are encouraged by GAAP. IV. Government-controlled entities are within the scope of IFRSs, i.e. those that are profit-oriented are no longer exempted from disclosing transactions with other state-controlled entities.arrow_forwardWhat are accounting errors and how they are reported. What are the disclosure requirements for correction of errors. Please see FASB codification to discuss the disclosure requirements.arrow_forward1. Which statement is incorrect regarding materiality judgments? A. An entity is only required to apply recognition and measurement equirements in PFRSS when the effect of applying them material. B. An entity need not provide a disclosure specified by a PFRS if the information resulting from that disclosure is not material. C. Public availability of information relieves an entity of the obligation to provide material information in its financial statements. D. It is inappropriate for the entity to make, or leave uncorrected, immaterial departures from PFRSs to achieve a particular presentation of its financial position, financial performance or cash flows. 2. Which of the following is an appropriate aggregation? A. Cash and cash equivalents (Cash in bank and sinking fund) B. Trade and other receivables (Accounts receivable and investment in bonds) C. Trade and other payables (Accounts payable and accruals) D. Provisions (Income tax payable and warranty liability) 3. Which of the…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College PubAuditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage LearningBusiness/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...AccountingISBN:9781337485913Author:BROOKSPublisher:Cengage
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337485913
Author:BROOKS
Publisher:Cengage